Personality Temperament, Character and Behavior

α
Akhmet Dyussenbayev
Akhmet Dyussenbayev

Send Message

To: Author

Personality Temperament, Character and Behavior

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

61GEV

Personality Temperament, Character and Behavior Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Existing classifications of temperament, characters, personality types and ways of behaviour are the disputable issues of the present-day scientific world. The origins of the classifications rise from the ancient philosophy and medicine in China and India (VIII BCE), Greece (V BCE), Rome (II century AD), England and Germany (ХIХ century), USA and Russia (ХХ century). Tremendous amount of the classifications were worked out all over the world and not all of them withstood the test of time. The references to Hippocrates’ and Claudius Galenus’ classifications occur chiefly, which are tangential with regard to mentality and psychic setup and based on humoralism (humorism). Great empirical and experimental materials have been accumulated in scientific history without harmonious systematization in view of the absence of the integrated international system of classification that is the factor restraining the further development of typology. There were curious incidents during typology march. Fourier described three hundred characters, for instance. Unfortunately, any ordinary person could not be able to remember all these descriptions. Since then, researches, finding and admission of the optimum types became the task of paramount importance for the scientists.

References

33 Cites in Article
  1. G Aizenk (1999). Personality structure.
  2. V Bekhterev (1991). Objective psychology.
  3. J Godfrua (1992). What is psychology? 2 volumes.
  4. A Dyussenbayev (1988). Methods of determining the individual typological characteristics of higher nervous activity in birds. Questions of the physiology of higher nervous activity.
  5. A Dyussenbayev (1989). The new classification of the types of nervous system.
  6. P Balaban,A Vinarskaya,A Zuzina (1990). REINFORCING TRANSMITTER IS NECESSARY FOR RECONSOLIDATION OF MEMORY.
  7. A Dyussenbayev (1990). Conditioning of the hens of various types of higher nervous activity.
  8. A Dyussenbayev (1990). The types of higher nervous activity and steadiness to stresses of hens. Informational publication of agricultural science of Kazakhstan.
  9. A Dyussenbayev (1991). British Society for Parasitology Autumn Symposium on “Parasite Neurobiology” City University, London, 28 September 1990.
  10. Herwinda Rahayu,Yhona Paratmanitya,Herni Herawati,Eka Nurhayati,Rindi Nuryani (1991). Factors related to complementary feeding practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia.
  11. A Dyussenbayev (1991). Classification of the types of higher nervous activity taking into account the peculiarities of thinking.
  12. A Dyussenbayev (1991). Experimental and theoretical premises on development of the new type classification of higher nervous activity.
  13. A Dyussenbayev (1991). Classification of the types of higher nervous activity taking into account the peculiarities of the analytical and synthetic brain activity.
  14. A Dyussenbayev (1991). Main lines of conditional and reflectory memory.
  15. A Dyussenbayev (1991). Temperament as the neuron and dynamics foundation for psychological dynamics and the types of higher nervous activity.
  16. A Dyussenbayev (1999). Classification of temperament, character, personality types and behaviors.
  17. A Dyussenbayev (2004). Personality structure. New generation.
  18. A Dyussenbayev (2011). Rutt, Rev. Mgr Canon (Cecil) Richard, (27 Aug. 1925–27 July 2011).
  19. G Solovieva,Z Rakhmetova (2012). Man and His Health.
  20. L Karpenko (1990). Psychology. Dictionary.
  21. V Nebylitsin (1976). Psychophysiological research of individual differences.
  22. R Nemov (2005). Unknown Title.
  23. I Pavlov (1954). Physiological doctrine of nervous system types and temperaments. The types of higher nervous activity and experimental neurosis.
  24. Ivan Pavlov (1954). General Types of Animal and Human Higher Nervous Activity70.
  25. V Russalov (1979). Biological foundations for individual and psychological differences.
  26. V (1971). Application of quantity characteristic of higher nervous activity types. Method of evaluation of higher nervous activity characteristics.
  27. P Balaban,A Vinarskaya,A Zuzina (1988). REINFORCING TRANSMITTER IS NECESSARY FOR RECONSOLIDATION OF MEMORY.
  28. Pavel Simonov (1981). Individual Characteristics of Brain Limbic Structures Interactions as the Basis of Pavlovian/Eysenckian Typology.
  29. B Teplov (1956). PROBLEMS IN THE STUDY OF GENERAL TYPES OF HIGHER NERVOUS ACTIVITY IN MAN AND ANIMALS.
  30. B Teplov (1961). The problems of individual differences.
  31. V Tyukhtin,Y Urmantsev (1988). System. Symmetry.
  32. G Chaichenko (1987). Psychology foundations of higher nervous activity.
  33. К Jung (1998). PERSONALITY TYPE AS A FACTOR DETERMINING PREFERENCES OF INTERPRETERS IN TYPES OF TRANSLATION.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Akhmet Dyussenbayev. 2014. \u201cPersonality Temperament, Character and Behavior\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 14 (GJHSS Volume 14 Issue A4): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 14 Issue A4
Pg. 53- 60
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 28, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4594
Total Downloads: 2184
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Existing classifications of temperament, characters, personality types and ways of behaviour are the disputable issues of the present-day scientific world. The origins of the classifications rise from the ancient philosophy and medicine in China and India (VIII BCE), Greece (V BCE), Rome (II century AD), England and Germany (ХIХ century), USA and Russia (ХХ century). Tremendous amount of the classifications were worked out all over the world and not all of them withstood the test of time. The references to Hippocrates’ and Claudius Galenus’ classifications occur chiefly, which are tangential with regard to mentality and psychic setup and based on humoralism (humorism). Great empirical and experimental materials have been accumulated in scientific history without harmonious systematization in view of the absence of the integrated international system of classification that is the factor restraining the further development of typology. There were curious incidents during typology march. Fourier described three hundred characters, for instance. Unfortunately, any ordinary person could not be able to remember all these descriptions. Since then, researches, finding and admission of the optimum types became the task of paramount importance for the scientists.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Personality Temperament, Character and Behavior

Akhmet Dyussenbayev
Akhmet Dyussenbayev

Research Journals