Physical Contradictions Ruling out Photonic Quantum Nonlocality

α
Andre Vatarescu
Andre Vatarescu

Send Message

To: Author

Physical Contradictions Ruling out Photonic Quantum Nonlocality

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

56G32

Physical Contradictions Ruling out Photonic Quantum Nonlocality Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

A series of physical contradictions can be identified in an opinion article published in December 2015 (A. Aspect, “Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate,” Physics 8, 123, 2015) claiming definitive proof of quantum nonlocality based on entangled pairs of photons. For example, experimental results published simultaneously in Physical Review Letters (250401 and 250402, 2015) were theoretically fitted with distributions containing a dominant unentangled component, contradicting the need for maximally entangled states underpinning quantum nonlocality. Such contradictions were ignored by the 2022 Nobel Prize Committee raising doubts about the validity of their decision.

References

16 Cites in Article
  1. (null). Figure 3. Posterior model probabilities given the observed data (N = 62) and relationship between the attraction weight and the placebo effect..
  2. Unknown Title.
  3. R Iii,Griffiths (2020). Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics.
  4. Frank Tipler (2014). Quantum nonlocality does not exist.
  5. Karl Hess (2021). What Do Bell-Tests Prove? A Detailed Critique of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Including Counterexamples.
  6. Stephen Boughn (2017). Making Sense of Bell’s Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality.
  7. Andrei Khrennikov (2019). Get Rid of Nonlocality from Quantum Physics.
  8. Marian Kupczynski (2018). Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality.
  9. Andre Vatarescu (2019). The Scattering and Disappearance of Entangled Photons in a Homogeneous Dielectric Medium.
  10. A Vatarescu (2022). Polarimetric Quantum-Strong Correlations with Independent Photons on the Poincaré Sphere.
  11. Andre Vatarescu (2014). Photonic coupling between quadrature states of light in a homogeneous and optically linear dielectric medium.
  12. M Iannuzzi,R Francini,R Messi,D Moricciani (2020). Bell-type polarization experiment with pairs of uncorrelated optical photons.
  13. Marissa Giustina,Marijn Versteegh,Sören Wengerowsky,Johannes Handsteiner,Armin Hochrainer,Kevin Phelan,Fabian Steinlechner,Johannes Kofler,Jan-Åke Larsson,Carlos Abellán,Waldimar Amaya,Valerio Pruneri,Morgan Mitchell,Jörn Beyer,Thomas Gerrits,Adriana Lita,Lynden Shalm,Sae Nam,Thomas Scheidl,Rupert Ursin,Bernhard Wittmann,Anton Zeilinger (2015). Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons.
  14. L Shalm (2015). Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism.
  15. Alain Aspect (2015). Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate.
  16. J Gordon,H Kogelnik (2000). PMD fundamentals: Polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Andre Vatarescu. 2026. \u201cPhysical Contradictions Ruling out Photonic Quantum Nonlocality\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering GJRE-G Volume 22 (GJRE Volume 22 Issue G2): .

Download Citation

Alternative.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-G Classification: DDC Code: 530.12 LCC Code: QC174.12
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 24, 2022

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1489
Total Downloads: 33
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

A series of physical contradictions can be identified in an opinion article published in December 2015 (A. Aspect, “Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate,” Physics 8, 123, 2015) claiming definitive proof of quantum nonlocality based on entangled pairs of photons. For example, experimental results published simultaneously in Physical Review Letters (250401 and 250402, 2015) were theoretically fitted with distributions containing a dominant unentangled component, contradicting the need for maximally entangled states underpinning quantum nonlocality. Such contradictions were ignored by the 2022 Nobel Prize Committee raising doubts about the validity of their decision.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Physical Contradictions Ruling out Photonic Quantum Nonlocality

Andre Vatarescu
Andre Vatarescu

Research Journals