Preserve for Whom? The Contradictions in the Preservation of the Urban-Industrial Heritage in Campinas (SP)

α
Rafael Roxo
Rafael Roxo

Send Message

To: Author

Preserve for Whom? The Contradictions in the Preservation of the Urban-Industrial Heritage in Campinas (SP)

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3N996

Preserve for Whom? The Contradictions in the Preservation of the Urban-Industrial Heritage in Campinas (SP) Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the notion of cultural heritage within the process of production and restructuring of the city, understanding as historically urban and architectural interventionsboth those that aim at the renewal of urban forms and functions as well as those with the purpose of preserving heritage and of the city’s memory -are involved in the different periods. In this sense, the projects and actions carried out by the agents that produce the space in Campinas -the municipal government, businessmen (from the industrial, real estate, cultural, popular trade, among others), residents (old and new), institutions and political groups for the defense of heritage -show conflicts over the uses, functions and material and symbolic appropriation of the city.

References

21 Cites in Article
  1. Wania Bertinato,Lucy Valim (2012). A história da preservação do patrimônio cultural em Campinas.
  2. Ana Carlos,Fani Alessandri (2007). Diferenciação socioespacial.
  3. Everaldo Costa,; Batista Da,Francisco Scarlato,Capuano (2009). As fases da reprodução do patrimônio cultural brasileiro: interpretação e valoração da paisagem urbana da gênese colonial à mercantilização das cidades históricas no Brasil.
  4. Everaldo Costa,Batista Da (2008). A dialética da construção destrutiva na consagração do patrimônio mundial: o caso de Diamantina (MG).
  5. Rita Francisco,De Cássia (2008). Inventário como ferramenta de preservação: a experiência da cidade de Campinas/SP.
  6. Henry-Pierre Jeudy (2005). O espelho das cidades.
  7. Beatriz Kühl (2010). Patrimônio industrial: algumas questões em aberto.
  8. Rogério Leite,; Proença Leite,Paulo Peixoto (2009). Políticas urbanas de patrimonialização e contrarrevanchismo: o Recife Antigo e a Zona Histórica da Cidade do Porto.
  9. José Martins,De Souza (1992). Subúrbio. Vida cotidiana e história no subúrbio de São Paulo: São Caetano do fim do Império ao fim da República Velha.
  10. Ulpiano Meneses,Toledo Bezerra (1992). O direito à memória: patrimônio histórico e cidadania.
  11. Elton Pinto,Gustavo Paiva,Danielle Carmo,Mirele Costa (2009). Observatório do Sistema Nacional do Patrimônio Cultural.
  12. Jérôme Monnet (1996). O álibi do patrimônio: a crise da cidade, gestão urbana, nostalgia do passado.
  13. Maria Paes-Luchiari,Duarte (2006). Centros históricos- Mercantilização e territorialidades do patrimônio cultural urbano.
  14. Glória Alves (2005). Processos de requalificação das áreas centrais das cidades de Belém, Marabá e São Paulo.
  15. Madaleine Reberioux (1992). O direito à memória: patrimônio histórico e cidadania.
  16. Fernanda Rodrigues (2012). A patrimonialização do cotidiano: desafio para as políticas públicas.
  17. Milton Santos (1987). Modernidade e memória.
  18. Simone Scifoni (2013). LUGARES DE MEMÓRIA OPERÁRIA NA METRÓPOLE PAULISTA.
  19. Neil Smith (2007). GENTRIFICAÇÃO, A FRONTEIRA E A REESTRUTURAÇÃO DO ESPAÇO URBANO.
  20. Sharon Zukin (1996). Paisagens urbanas pósmodernas: mapeando culturas e poder.
  21. Mengke Zhang (2024). The state-led approach to industrial heritage in China’s mega-events: capital accumulation, urban regeneration, and heritage preservation.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Rafael Roxo. 2020. \u201cPreserve for Whom? The Contradictions in the Preservation of the Urban-Industrial Heritage in Campinas (SP)\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 20 (GJHSS Volume 20 Issue H9): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 20 Issue H9
Pg. 15- 24
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 120599
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 9, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2466
Total Downloads: 1128
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

In this article, we analyze the notion of cultural heritage within the process of production and restructuring of the city, understanding as historically urban and architectural interventionsboth those that aim at the renewal of urban forms and functions as well as those with the purpose of preserving heritage and of the city’s memory -are involved in the different periods. In this sense, the projects and actions carried out by the agents that produce the space in Campinas -the municipal government, businessmen (from the industrial, real estate, cultural, popular trade, among others), residents (old and new), institutions and political groups for the defense of heritage -show conflicts over the uses, functions and material and symbolic appropriation of the city.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Preserve for Whom? The Contradictions in the Preservation of the Urban-Industrial Heritage in Campinas (SP)

Rafael Roxo
Rafael Roxo

Research Journals