Proportional Optimization of Cow Dung and Cow Bone Char for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil

Baniviga, Tombari Barimme; Momoh, O.L, Yusuf; Ibiba Taiwo Horsfall

Proportional Optimization of Cow Dung and Cow Bone Char for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil

Baniviga, Tombari Barimme * §

Contact

Momoh, O.L, Yusuf

Contact

Ibiba Taiwo Horsfall

Contact

University of Port-Harcourt Choba

Proportional Optimization of Cow Dung and Cow Bone Char for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

REMJ7V5

Proportional Optimization of Cow Dung and Cow Bone Char for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

In this research, attempts were made to study the effects of cow dung and cow bone char mixture for bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soil. This process of remediation was conducted ex-situ using an optimization technique termed three-level design with two factors -𝟑𝟑 𝟐𝟐 design factorial. The first-order kinetics was also employed in studying the kinetics of degradation with the observed correlation of determination (𝐑𝐑 𝟐𝟐 ) between (0.726 -0.969).The optimization technique shows also that the optimal mix range between 20 -38% for cow dung and 35 -50% for bone char. In terms of mass, this translates to an optimal mix of 30-57g of cow dung and 52.5 -75gof bone char for every 2kg of soil having a 4% crude oil contamination relative to the total mass of the mixture.

References

15 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Samuel Agarry,Kigho Oghenejoboh,Bamidele Solomon (2005). KINETIC MODELLING AND HALF LIFE STUDY OF ADSORPTIVE BIOREMEDIATION OF SOIL ARTIFICIALLY CONTAMINATED WITH BONNY LIGHT CRUDE OIL.
M Alexander (1994). Biodegradation and Bioremediation.
Y Al-Sulaimani,S Al-Wahaibi,Al-Bahry (2010). Experimental investigation of bio surfactants produced by Bacillus species and their potential for MEOR in an Omani oil field.
T Annunciado,T Sydenstricker,S Amico (2005). Experimental investigation of various vegetable fibers as sorbent materials for oil spills.
D Davis,R Guidry (1996). Oil spills and the state responsibilities.
W Eckenfelder,R Norris (1993). Applicability of Biological Process for Treatment of Soils.
Maria Elektorowicz (1994). Bioeemediation of petroleum‐contaminated clayey soil with pretreatment.
D Bohrman,E Ingram (1994). Revised corrective action plan for underground storage tank 2331-U at the Building 9201-1 Site.
P Gradi (1985). Biodegradation: Its measurement and microbiological basis.
K Kiilham (1994). Soil Ecology.
A Kumar,B Bisht,V Joshi,T Dhewa (2011). Review of Bioremediation of Polluted Environment: A management tool.
J Leahy,R Colwell (1990). Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment.
M Leung (2004). CLEANING UP BILL’S MESS.
C Odu (1978). The effect of nutrient application and aeration on oil degradation in soil.
Rowland Ofoegbu,Y Momoh,I Nwaogazie (2014). Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Using Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Baniviga, Barimme, Momoh, Yusuf, Ibiba Horsfall. 2019. "Proportional Optimization of Cow Dung and Cow Bone Char for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil". Global Journal of Research in Engineering, Global Journal of Research in Engineering - J: General Engineering GJRE-J Volume 19 (GJRE Volume 19 Issue J5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 19 Issue J5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-J Classification FOR Code: 091599

090799

Submission ReceivedDecember 15, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 4, 2019

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 106

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering

Authors: Baniviga,Tombari Barimme, Momoh, O.L, Yusuf, Ibiba Taiwo Horsfall (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 373

Total Views (Real + Logic): 627

Total Downloads (simulated): 35

Publish Date: 2019 01, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 36 views
Month 2: 53 views
Month 3: 48 views
Month 4: 34 views
Month 5: 39 views
Month 6: 34 views
Month 7: 42 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 19 views
Month 10: 44 views
Month 11: 37 views
Month 12: 31 views
Month 13: 32 views
Month 14: 23 views
Month 15: 27 views
Month 16: 37 views
Month 17: 38 views
Month 18: 40 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 38 views
Month 21: 31 views
Month 22: 19 views
Month 23: 21 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 28 views
Month 26: 39 views
Month 27: 40 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 20 views
Month 30: 46 views
Month 31: 25 views
Month 32: 39 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 27 views
Month 35: 28 views
Month 36: 15 views
Month 37: 28 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 29 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 28 views
Month 42: 23 views
Month 43: 22 views
Month 44: 24 views
Month 45: 22 views
Month 46: 22 views
Month 47: 36 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 26 views
Month 51: 33 views
Month 52: 29 views
Month 53: 33 views
Month 54: 27 views
Month 55: 19 views
Month 56: 48 views
Month 57: 25 views
Month 58: 34 views
Month 59: 37 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 41 views
Month 62: 36 views
Month 63: 32 views
Month 64: 37 views
Month 65: 22 views
Month 66: 44 views
Month 67: 35 views
Month 68: 14 views
Month 69: 26 views
Month 70: 26 views
Month 71: 18 views
Month 72: 23 views
Month 73: 24 views
Month 74: 22 views
Month 75: 28 views
Month 76: 58 views
Month 77: 69 views
Month 78: 45 views
Month 79: 38 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 32 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 30 views
Month 85: 31 views
Month 86: 20 views
Month 87: 47 views
Month 88: 20 views
Month 89: 39 views
Month 90: 54 views
Month 91: 52 views
Month 92: 23 views

Total Views: 627

Total Downloads: 35

All Trends