Public Energy Management and Decision-Making Model: A Proposal based on Energy Sustainability Indicators

Public Energy Management and Decision-Making Model: A Proposal based on Energy Sustainability Indicators

Fabricio Quadros Borges

Contact

Fabrini Quadros Borges

Contact

Mário Rocha de Vasconcelos

Contact

Public Energy Management and Decision-Making Model: A Proposal based on Energy Sustainability Indicators

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

D4S9L

Public Energy Management and Decision-Making Model: A Proposal based on Energy Sustainability Indicators Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a decision-making model for the Brazilian electricity sector, based on sectoral indicators of energy sustainability. The methodology of this investigation constructed sectorial indicators of energy sustainability, from linear correlations verified between variables of the energy input and development variables, whose results fed a decision-making structure supported by technology, norms and rules and in the decision style. The place of study was the State of Pará and the time span between 2010 and 2019. The investigation concluded the need to re-read the decision-making process in the Brazilian electricity sector, through the essential use of a sectorial system of indicators, which demonstrates strategic respect for the specificities the economic sectors and to guide, through a decision-making model, how electricity can be translated into development based on the productive processes of these sectors.

References

40 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Roberta Marins (2020). Análise de atos normativos: o caso da Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica – Aneel.
(1999). Proposta de indicadores de sustentabilidade energética da ANEEL.
Agnes Amaral (2017). O impacto da insuficiência no fornecimento de energia elétrica nas empresas brasileiras do setor de telecomunicações..
Luis Aragón (1997). Educação superior, desenvolvimento sustentável e políticas públicas na Amazônia (Paper 298).
Banco Central,Brasil (2018). Economia paraense: estrutura produtiva e desempenho recente.
C Bermann (2003). Bioeconomia para quem?: bases para um desenvolvimento sustentável na Amazônia.
C Binder,E Voet,K Van Der; Rosselot (2009). Implementing the results of material flow analysis.
F Borges,D Zouain (2010). A matriz elétrica no estado do Pará e seu posicionamento na promoção do desenvolvimento sustentável.
Fabricio Borges (2012). Administração pública do setor elétrico: indicadores de sustentabilidade no ambiente residencial do estado do Pará (2001-10).
F Borges,J Loureiro (2015). Interpretações sobre Sustentabilidade nas Organizações do Setor Elétrico Brasileiro.
A Camargo,C Ugaya,L Agudelo (2004). Unknown Title.
A Campos,C Scarpati,B De,L Santos,U Pagel,R Souza,V De (2017). Um panorama sobre a energia geotérmica no Brasil e no Mundo: Aspectos ambientais e econômicos.
P Chen,P Popovic (2002). Correlation.
F Collaco,L Dias,S Simoes,T Pukset,J Seixas,C Bermann (2019). What if megacities started to do Urban Energy Planning? The case study of São Paulo city and its implication for the national energy policy.
Viorel Cornescu,Roxana Adam (2014). Considerations Regarding the Role of Indicators Used in the Analysis and Assessment of Sustainable Development in the E.U.
Anna Creti,Duc Nguyen,Lutz Kilian (2018). Special Issue "Energy Challenges in an Uncertain World" Editorial.
R Dagnino,P Cavalcanti,G Costa (2016). Gestão estratégica pública.
N Fenzl (1997). Estudo de parâmetros capazes de dimensionar a sustentabilidade de um processo de desenvolvimento.
M Fischer-Kowalski (1997). Gesellschaftlicher stoffwechsel und kolonisierung von natur.
M Lodhi (2005). Helio-hydro and helio-thermal production of hydrogen.
Georgia Assumpção,Hugo Campos,Ana De Albuquerque,Aline Dos Santos (2020). EDUCAÇÃO A DISTÂNCIA NO IBGE: O USO DE VÍDEO AULAS NO TREINAMENTO DA PESQUISA DE ORÇAMENTOS FAMILIARES 2017/2018.
C Kaltenegger (1995). Der Reformproze in der VR China: aktueller stand der wirtschaftsreformen und aussichten.
Jalberth De Araújo,Marcus Barros Florentino,Tarso Vilela Ferreira,Edson Guedes Da Costa,Benedito Luciano,George Soares De Lira,Rafael Mendonça Rocha Barros (2008). Mathematical modeling of transformers based on the frequency response of magnetizing parameters.
F Mafra,J Silva (2012). Porto: Sociedade portuguesa de inovação.
Bedřich Moldan,Svatava Janoušková,Tomáš Hák (2004). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets.
Seema Narayan,Nadia Doytch (2017). An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption.
(1995). Report of the secretary general commission on sustainable development: Work program on indicators of sustainable development.
G Pacheco,A Mattos (2014). Processo decisório no setor público: um estudo de caso na Caixa Econômica Federal e na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
J Pereira (2018). Administração Pública: foco nas instituições e ações governamentais.
J Pires,A Goldstein (2001). Agências reguladoras brasileiras: avaliação e desafios.
André Prado (2015). Desenvolvimento urbano sustentável: de paradigma a mito.
S Robbins (2015). Decida e conquiste: o guia definitivo para tomada de decisão.
L Reis,E Fadigas,C Carvalho (2012). Energia, recursos naturais e a prática do desenvolvimento sustentável.
I Sachs (2009). Caminhos para o desenvolvimento sustentável.
Kais Saidi,Mohammad Rahman,Mounira Amamri (2017). The causal nexus between economic growth and energy consumption: New evidence from global panel of 53 countries.
G Schultz (2016). Introdução à gestão de organizações.
João Silva,Sílvia Rebouças,Mônica Abreu,Maria Ribeiro (2018). Construção de um índice de desenvolvimento sustentável e análise espacial das desigualdades nos municípios cearenses.
R Silva (2013). Análise do processo decisório na administração pública e sistemas de apoio à tomada de decisão: contradições e paradoxos na realidade organizacional pelo não uso de ferramentas disponíveis.
V Smil (1993). China`s Environmental Crisis: an inquiry into the limits of national development.
A Stahel (1991). Capitalismo e entropia: os aspectos ideológicos de uma contradição e a 43.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Fabricio Quadros Borges. 2021. \u201cPublic Energy Management and Decision-Making Model: A Proposal based on Energy Sustainability Indicators\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management GJHSS-B Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue B3): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 21 Issue B3
Pg. 1- 16

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-B Classification: FOR Code: 280109

Submission ReceivedJune 6, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted June 30, 2021
Published July 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 8, 2021

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2045

Total Downloads: 907

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]