Public Private Partnership Models for Women Entrepreneurship Development in Agriculture

Binoo Bonny; A. Prema

Public Private Partnership Models for Women Entrepreneurship Development in Agriculture

Binoo P. Bonny * §

Contact

A. Prema ‡

Contact

P. Rajendran

Contact

§ Associate Professor, Communication Centre, Kerala Ag...

‡ Associate Professor, College of Horticulture, Kerala...

Public Private Partnership Models for Women Entrepreneurship Development in Agriculture

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

68MAQ

Public Private Partnership Models for Women Entrepreneurship Development in Agriculture Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The paper contributes empirical evidence on the status of Public- Private Partnership models (PPP) for rural women entrepreneurship development through Self Help Groups (SHGs) in agriculture and classifies them based on the concept of value creation. The study was conducted in Kerala, India during 2009-12, where women entrepreneurship development in agriculture through SHGs is rampant. Ex-post facto design was used to collect data from a purposive sample of 1400 from the four regionally representative zones of the state. Weighted score and case study methods were used in the selection and classification of the delineated models. Study identified 466 women development projects with PPP components. From this 22 cases with working PPP elements were selected for detailed analysis using a weighted score method. Six models with high scores viz Cadbury-KAU Cooperative Cocoa Research Project, Thirumadhuram Pineapple Project, Uravu RSVY Micro Enterprises Project, Sevashram Organic Producer Company, Subicsha Coconut Producers’ Company Ltd and Nendran Banana (Samagra) Project were used for detailed case study. The major public and private agencies involved and focus domains were delineated. Value creation estimated as percentage gains on factors related to income and empowerment for the group members and social and environment gains for the society was used to classify the development models as Public dominated welfare models and Private dominated employment models. Paper establishes the potential of PPP for scaling up entrepreneurship activities in SHGs by convergence of the core assets of public and private sectors. Results also opened possibilities of conceptualization of SHGs as social enterprises and use of PPP strategies in entrepreneurship development.

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Bina Agarwal (2003). Gender and Land rights Revisited: Exploring New prospects via the state, family and Market Journal of agrarian Change. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1-2), 184-224.
CrossRef DOI
2. E. Binenbaum,P (2001). Public‐Private Research Relationships: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001(3), 748-753.
3. Amitai Etzioni (1973). The Third sector and Domestic Missions. Public administration Review, 33(4), 314-323.
CrossRef DOI
4. Michael Gerrard,B. Public-Private Partnerships. Public Private Partnerships, 200.
5. Hashemi SM,Schuler SR,Riley AP (1996). Rural credit programs and women's empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635-653.
6. Helen Haugh (2007). Community–Led Social Venture Creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 161-182.
7. R. Larkin (1994). Public Private Partnerships in Economic development: A review of theory and practices. Economic Developement Review, 12, 7-9.
8. R. Martin,S. Osberg (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 28-39.
9. Natalie Mizik,Robert Jacobson (2003). Trading off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 63-76.
CrossRef DOI
10. J. O’Looney (1992). Public Private Partnerships in economic development negotiating the trade off between flexibility and accountability. Economic development review, 10(4), 14-22.
11. R. Osborn,C. Baughn (1990). FORMS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE FOR MULTINATIONAL ALLIANCES. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 503-519.
CrossRef DOI
12. M. Pitt,S (2006). Empowering Women with Micro Finance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 791-831.
13. S. Rangan,R. Samii,L. Van Wassenhove (2003). Constructive partnerships when alliance between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies.
14. J. Richter (2003). We the people or we the corporations? Critical reflections on UN business partnerships.
15. Bali Swain (2007). Can Microfinance Empower Women? Self-Help Groups in India. Dialogue
16. Oliver Williamson (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269.
CrossRef DOI
17. O. Williamson (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Binoo P. Bonny, A. Prema, P. Rajendran. 2014. "Public Private Partnership Models for Women Entrepreneurship Development in Agriculture". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue 14 (D4)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 14 Issue 14 (D4)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

private employment model public welfare model self help groups social enterprises value creation women empowerment

Classification

GJSFR-D Classification FOR Code: 970107

Submission ReceivedMay 5, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 29, 2014
Published April 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 15, 2014

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary

Authors: Binoo P. Bonny, A. Prema, P. Rajendran (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 394

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1437

Total Downloads (simulated): 121

Publish Date: 2014 04, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 63 views
Month 2: 44 views
Month 3: 50 views
Month 4: 40 views
Month 5: 66 views
Month 6: 39 views
Month 7: 41 views
Month 8: 55 views
Month 9: 42 views
Month 10: 38 views
Month 11: 42 views
Month 12: 41 views
Month 13: 41 views
Month 14: 21 views
Month 15: 26 views
Month 16: 27 views
Month 17: 23 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 40 views
Month 20: 15 views
Month 21: 42 views
Month 22: 38 views
Month 23: 35 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 21 views
Month 26: 14 views
Month 27: 48 views
Month 28: 35 views
Month 29: 35 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 43 views
Month 32: 16 views
Month 33: 28 views
Month 34: 19 views
Month 35: 30 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 18 views
Month 40: 24 views
Month 41: 20 views
Month 42: 20 views
Month 43: 27 views
Month 44: 37 views
Month 45: 37 views
Month 46: 33 views
Month 47: 32 views
Month 48: 25 views
Month 49: 22 views
Month 50: 35 views
Month 51: 36 views
Month 52: 22 views
Month 53: 28 views
Month 54: 37 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 19 views
Month 57: 25 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 19 views
Month 60: 42 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 47 views
Month 63: 28 views
Month 64: 29 views
Month 65: 22 views
Month 66: 41 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 36 views
Month 70: 31 views
Month 71: 18 views
Month 72: 40 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 30 views
Month 75: 24 views
Month 76: 32 views
Month 77: 40 views
Month 78: 23 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 24 views
Month 81: 30 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 36 views
Month 84: 19 views
Month 85: 14 views
Month 86: 31 views
Month 87: 17 views
Month 88: 26 views
Month 89: 25 views
Month 90: 27 views
Month 91: 31 views
Month 92: 21 views
Month 93: 27 views
Month 94: 31 views
Month 95: 25 views
Month 96: 27 views
Month 97: 26 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 44 views
Month 100: 25 views
Month 101: 42 views
Month 102: 43 views
Month 103: 46 views
Month 104: 41 views
Month 105: 34 views
Month 106: 44 views
Month 107: 37 views
Month 108: 36 views
Month 109: 39 views
Month 110: 43 views
Month 111: 23 views
Month 112: 29 views
Month 113: 34 views
Month 114: 43 views
Month 115: 22 views
Month 116: 30 views
Month 117: 18 views
Month 118: 39 views
Month 119: 30 views
Month 120: 13 views
Month 121: 21 views
Month 122: 35 views
Month 123: 16 views
Month 124: 26 views
Month 125: 46 views
Month 126: 38 views
Month 127: 33 views
Month 128: 26 views
Month 129: 30 views
Month 130: 38 views
Month 131: 42 views
Month 132: 31 views
Month 133: 27 views
Month 134: 33 views
Month 135: 35 views
Month 136: 47 views
Month 137: 54 views
Month 138: 39 views
Month 139: 27 views
Month 140: 35 views
Month 141: 68 views
Month 142: 45 views
Month 143: 43 views
Month 144: 48 views
Month 145: 58 views
Month 146: 35 views
Month 147: 31 views
Month 148: 48 views
Month 149: 44 views
Month 150: 16 views
Month 151: 27 views

Total Views: 1.4K

Total Downloads: 121

All Trends