Radar Based Lie Detection Technique

1
Kedar Nath Sahu
Kedar Nath Sahu
2
Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu
Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu
3
Dr. K Jaya Sankar
Dr. K Jaya Sankar
1 Stanley College of Engineering and Technology for Women, Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

Send Message

To: Author

GJRE Volume 14 Issue F5

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

11YQ3

Radar Based Lie Detection Technique Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

The objective of our study was to evaluate, in a population of Togolese People Living With HIV(PLWHIV), the agreement between three scores derived from the general population namely the Framingham score, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the World Health Organization.
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The need for lie detection is to resolve disputes that arise over inheritance, forgery, impersonation as well as in forensic science which deals with application of science to law aiding to deliver justice by eliciting truth, scientific evaluation of physical evidence usually encountered in many civil, criminal regulatory and statutory cases. All the methods for lie detection including the most popular polygraph testing depend on the measurement of variation of physiological conditions like heart beat rate, respiratory rate (breath rate), etc. by establishing physical contact of some medical device with the person’s body and thus are invasive and obtrusive. But these physiological conditions vary due to the effect on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) for any reason irrespective of whether the person tells a lie or the person is innocent but feels nervous for being under test. This leads to an ambiguous and/or inaccurate decision about the person telling lies. A radar based lie detector proposed recently can be a remote, non-contact, non-invasive and unobtrusive method. This review paper summarizes the common signs of deceptive behavior, major non-radar based methods used earlier and finally, the radar based technique for lie detection that has emerged as a technical breakthrough in lie detection.

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

15 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Enrico Staderini (2003). An UWB Radar Based Stealthy ‘Lie Detector’.
  2. E Lander (1989). DNA fingerprinting on trial.
  3. L Simpson (1989). Fairfax, Sir James Reading, (17 Oct. 1834–29 March 1919), senior proprietor of the Sydney Morning Herald and the Sydney Mail.
  4. Gtc Lambourne (1979). The Use of Fingerprints in Idntification.
  5. Jerzy Kasprzak (1990). Possibilities of cheiloscopy.
  6. A Parry,E Matthews P M ; Donchin,G Miller,L Farwell (1986). The Endogenous Components of the Event Related Potential-A diagnostic Tool.
  7. Lawrence Farwell,Emanuel Donchin (1991). The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) With Event‐Related Brain Potentials.
  8. L Farwell,S Smith (2001). Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal.
  9. E M Staderini (2002). UWB Radars in Medicine.
  10. Ernest Haggard,Kenneth Isaacs (1966). Micromomentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanisms in psychotherapy.
  11. How Lying Works by Tom Scheve.
  12. Susan Adams (1996). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, October 2009.
  13. Paul Clikeman (2012). Signs of Deception.
  14. Pav Lidis,T Loannis (2004). Lie detection using thermal imaging.
  15. Skolnik Merrill,I (2007). Introduction to Radar Systems.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Kedar Nath Sahu. 2014. \u201cRadar Based Lie Detection Technique\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic GJRE-F Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue F5): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 4, 2014

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4791
Total Downloads: 2382
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

The need for lie detection is to resolve disputes that arise over inheritance, forgery, impersonation as well as in forensic science which deals with application of science to law aiding to deliver justice by eliciting truth, scientific evaluation of physical evidence usually encountered in many civil, criminal regulatory and statutory cases. All the methods for lie detection including the most popular polygraph testing depend on the measurement of variation of physiological conditions like heart beat rate, respiratory rate (breath rate), etc. by establishing physical contact of some medical device with the person’s body and thus are invasive and obtrusive. But these physiological conditions vary due to the effect on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) for any reason irrespective of whether the person tells a lie or the person is innocent but feels nervous for being under test. This leads to an ambiguous and/or inaccurate decision about the person telling lies. A radar based lie detector proposed recently can be a remote, non-contact, non-invasive and unobtrusive method. This review paper summarizes the common signs of deceptive behavior, major non-radar based methods used earlier and finally, the radar based technique for lie detection that has emerged as a technical breakthrough in lie detection.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Radar Based Lie Detection Technique

Kedar Nath Sahu
Kedar Nath Sahu Stanley College of Engineering and Technology for Women, Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu
Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu
Dr. K Jaya Sankar
Dr. K Jaya Sankar

Research Journals