Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

α
Dra. Julieta Fumagalli
Dra. Julieta Fumagalli
σ
Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro
Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro
ρ
Dra. Virginia Jaichenco
Dra. Virginia Jaichenco

Send Message

To: Author

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

E0UX5

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Became a fluent reader is one of the aims of the reading learning process. In previous researches, the relationship between oral and silent reading fluency and text reading comprehension has been investigated with different results. According to the variety of information about the topic, the purpose of this work is to compare oral and silent reading fluency to establish possible differences between reading modalities and the implications for reading comprehension. A sample of 171 children from 3rd, 5th, and 7th grade answered three tasks: a standardized word and non-word reading task, an oral reading comprehension task, and a silent reading comprehension task, both designed ad hoc. In order to compare the three groups of students, time measures and accuracy were calculated for word and no-word reading task, and time and comprehension measures were considered for oral and silent reading comprehension tasks.

References

39 Cites in Article
  1. Linnea Ehri (2005). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings.
  2. Linnea Ehri (2014). Orthographic Mapping in the Acquisition of Sight Word Reading, Spelling Memory, and Vocabulary Learning.
  3. Linnea Ehri,Sandra Mccormick (1998). PHASES OF WORD LEARNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION WITH DELAYED AND DISABLED READERS.
  4. D Elgart (1978). Oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension: A comparative study.
  5. Aintzane Etxebarria,Iñaki Gaminde,Asier Romero,Aitor Iglesias (2016). Desarrollo de la competencia prosódica en la lectura en voz alta: importancia de las pausas.
  6. J Fletcher,P Pumfrey (1988). Differences in Text Comprehension Amongst 7-8-Year-Old Children.
  7. Héctor García-Rodicio,María-Ángeles Melero,María-Belén Izquierdo (2017). A comparison of reading aloud, silent reading and follower reading. Which is best for comprehension? / Una comparación de lectura en voz alta, lectura en silencio y lectura de seguimiento. ¿Cuál es mejor para la comprensión?.
  8. Andrea Hale,Renee Hawkins,Wesley Sheeley,Jennifer Reynolds,Shonna Jenkins,Ara Schmitt,Daniel Martin (2011). An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using Maze assessment procedures.
  9. R Hernandez Sampieri,C Fernandez Collado,P Baptista Lucio (2008). Metodología de la investigación.
  10. R Hudson (2011). Fluency problems: Where and how to intervene.
  11. R Hudson,P Pullen,H Lane,J Torgesen (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view.
  12. R Hudson,J Torgesen,H Lane,S Turner (2012). Relations among reading skills and subskills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers.
  13. Melanie Kuhn,Paula Schwanenflugel,Elizabeth Meisinger (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency.
  14. David Laberge,S Samuels (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.
  15. E Leibovich (2012). Dame la palabra 3.
  16. Carmen López-Escribano,María Elosúa De Juan,Isabel Gómez-Veiga,Juan García-Madruga (2013). A predictive study of reading comprehension in third-grade Spanish students.
  17. R Mccallum,Shannon Sharp,Sherry Bell,Thomas George (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency.
  18. J Metsala,L Ehri (2013). Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy.
  19. Justin Miller,Paula Schwanenflugel (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children.
  20. C Martinovich,I Zalduendo,P Cobelli (2013). CLUSTERING OF LAGRANGIAN PARTICLES IN 2D TURBULENCE.
  21. David Paige,Timothy Rasinski,Theresa Magpuri-Lavell,Grant Smith (2014). Interpreting the Relationships Among Prosody, Automaticity, Accuracy, and Silent Reading Comprehension in Secondary Students.
  22. C Perfetti (1985). Reading ability.
  23. Charles Perfetti,Joseph Stafura (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension.
  24. S Prior,K Welling (2001). Read in your head": a vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading.
  25. Suzanne Prior,Kimberley Fenwick,Katie Saunders,Rachel Ouellette,Chantell O'quinn,Shannon Harvey (2011). Comprehension After Oral and Silent Reading: Does Grade Level Matter?.
  26. T Rasinski (2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension.
  27. Timothy Rasinski (2006). Reading Fluency Instruction: Moving Beyond Accuracy, Automaticity, and Prosody.
  28. T Rasinski (2010). Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-306-1548, Scholastic, Inc., New York, New York..
  29. T Rasinski,D Paige,C Rains,F Stewart,B Julovich,D Prenkert,W Nichols (2017). Effects of Intensive Fluency Instruction on the Reading Proficiency of Third-Grade Struggling Readers.
  30. Timothy Rasinski,Andrew Rikli,Susan Johnston (2009). Reading Fluency: More Than Automaticity? More Than a Concern for the Primary Grades?.
  31. Daiana Stella (2008). Reseña crítica. Formar en práctica reflexiva, Rebecca Anijovich y Graciela Cappelletti (compiladoras). Aique, Buenos Aires, 2023, 176 páginas..
  32. Pablo Wright (2008). Notas etnográficas sobre ser-en-red, proxémica y ontología.
  33. S Samuels (2006). Toward a Model of Reading Fluency.
  34. Labos Edith,Zabala Karina,Trojanowski Sofía,Del Miriam,Bento Ana,Renato Alejandro (1991). AGING AND FUNCTIONAL COMPLEX ACTIVITIES: CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES.
  35. Paula Schwanenflugel,Anne Hamilton,Melanie Kuhn,Joseph Wisenbaker,Steven Stahl (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers..
  36. C Martinovich,I Zalduendo,P Cobelli (2013). CLUSTERING OF LAGRANGIAN PARTICLES IN 2D TURBULENCE.
  37. Chase Young,Kathleen Mohr,Timothy Rasinski (2015). Reading Together: A Successful Reading Fluency Intervention.
  38. B Zimmerman,T Rasinski (2012). The Fluency Development Lesson: A Model of Authentic and Effective Fluency Instruction.
  39. Jerry Zutell,Timothy Rasinski (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dra. Julieta Fumagalli. 2019. \u201cReading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 19 (GJHSS Volume 19 Issue G9): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 339999
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 29, 2019

Language
es
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2542
Total Downloads: 1225
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Became a fluent reader is one of the aims of the reading learning process. In previous researches, the relationship between oral and silent reading fluency and text reading comprehension has been investigated with different results. According to the variety of information about the topic, the purpose of this work is to compare oral and silent reading fluency to establish possible differences between reading modalities and the implications for reading comprehension. A sample of 171 children from 3rd, 5th, and 7th grade answered three tasks: a standardized word and non-word reading task, an oral reading comprehension task, and a silent reading comprehension task, both designed ad hoc. In order to compare the three groups of students, time measures and accuracy were calculated for word and no-word reading task, and time and comprehension measures were considered for oral and silent reading comprehension tasks.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

Dra. Julieta Fumagalli
Dra. Julieta Fumagalli
Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro
Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro
Dra. Virginia Jaichenco
Dra. Virginia Jaichenco

Research Journals