Real Power Loss Reduction by Revolutionary Algorithm

Dr.K.Lenin

Real Power Loss Reduction by Revolutionary Algorithm

Dr.K.Lenin * §

Contact

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kukatpally

Real Power Loss Reduction by Revolutionary Algorithm

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

03H96

Real Power Loss Reduction by Revolutionary Algorithm Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

In this paper, Kidney Search (KS) algorithm is proposed for solving reactive power problem. When using KS algorithm, solutions are rated based on the average value of the objective function in a particular population of particular round. Optimal solutions are identified in the filtered blood and the rest are considered as inferior solutions. As the algorithm proposed by the name of kidney, it reproduces various processes from the system of a biological kidney. Proposed Kidney search (KS) algorithm has been tested on standard IEEE 30 bus test system and simulation results show clearly about the better performance of the proposed KS algorithm in reducing the real power loss.

References

26 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. (1985). Unknown Title. Transactions on power Apparatus and systems, 1147-1153.
2. A Monticelli,M Pereira,S Granville (1987). Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Post-Contingency Corrective Rescheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2(1), 175-180.
3. N Deeb,S Shahidehpur (1990). Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach. IEEE Transactions on power system, 5(2), 428-435.
4. E Hobson (1980). Network Constrained Reactive Power Control Using Linear Programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-99(3), 868-877.
5. K Lee,Y Park,J Oritz Fuel -cost optimization for both real and reactive power dispatches. IEE Proc, 131(3), 85-93.
6. Maurice Mangoli,Kwang Lee,Young Moon Park (1993). Optimal real and reactive power control using linear programming. Electric Power Systems Research, 26(1), 1-10.
7. C Canizares,A De Souza,V Quintana (1996). Comparison of performance indices for detection of proximity to voltage collapse. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(3), 1441-1450.
8. K Anburaja (2002). Optimal power flow using refined genetic algorithm. Electr.Power Compon.Syst, 30, 1055-1063.
9. D Devaraj,B Yegnanarayana (2005). Genetic-algorithm-based optimal power flow for security enhancement. IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 152(6), 899.
10. A Berizzi,C Bovo,M Merlo,M Delfanti (2012). A ga approach to compare orpf objective functions including secondary voltage regulation. Electric Power Systems Research, 84(1), 187-194.
11. Chien-Feng Yang,Gordon Lai,Chia-Hau Lee,Ching-Tzong Su,Gary Chang (2012). Optimal setting of reactive compensation devices with an improved voltage stability index for voltage stability enhancement. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 37(1), 50-57.
12. P Roy,S Ghoshal,S Thakur (2012). Optimal var control for improvements in voltage profiles and for real power loss minimization using biogeography based optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 43(1), 830-838.
13. B Venkatesh,G Sadasivam,M Khan (2000). A new optimal reactive power scheduling method for loss minimization and voltage stability margin maximization using successive multi-objective fuzzy lp technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(2), 844-851.
14. W Yan,S Lu,D Yu (2004). A novel optimal reactive power dispatch method based on an improved hybrid evolutionary programming technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(2), 913-918.
15. W Yan,F Liu,C Chung,K Wong (2006). A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–Interior Point Method for Optimal Reactive Power Flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21(3), 1163-1169.
16. Juan Yu,Wei Yan,Wenyuan Li,C Chung,K Wong (2008). An Unfixed Piecewise-Optimal Reactive Power-Flow Model and its Algorithm for AC-DC Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23(1), 170-176.
17. Florin Capitanescu (2011). Assessing Reactive Power Reserves With Respect to Operating Constraints and Voltage Stability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(4), 2224-2234.
18. Z Hu,X Wang,G Taylor (2010). Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch: Formulation and solution method. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 32(6), 615-621.
19. A Kargarian,M Raoofat,M Mohammadi (2012). Probabilistic reactive power procurement in hybrid electricity markets with uncertain loads. Electric Power Systems Research, 82(1), 68-80.
20. N Jaddi,J Alvankarian,S Abdullah (2017). Kidney-inspired algorithm for optimization problems. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 42, 358-369.
21. Q Wu,Y Cao,J Wen (1998). Optimal reactive power dispatch using an adaptive genetic algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 20(8), 563-569.
22. B Zhao,C Guo,Y Cao (2005). A Multiagent-Based Particle Swarm Optimization Approach for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(2), 1070-1078.
23. K Mahadevan,P Kannan (2010). Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for reactive power dispatch. Applied Soft Computing, 10(2), 641-652.
24. A Khazali,M Kalantar (2011). Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 33(3), 684-692.
25. M Sakthivel,V Gayathri,Manimozhi (2013). A Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithm for Reactive Power Control in a Power System. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 2, 1.
26. Tejaswini Sharma,Laxmi Srivastava,Shishir Dixit (2016). Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm For Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch. Proceedings of 38 th IRF International Conference, 4-8.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr.K.Lenin. 2017. "Real Power Loss Reduction by Revolutionary Algorithm". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic GJRE-F Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue F5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 17 Issue F5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-F Classification FOR Code: 090607

Submission ReceivedDecember 15, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2017
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 2, 2017

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 106

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic

Authors: Dr.K.Lenin (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 380

Total Views (Real + Logic): 881

Total Downloads (simulated): 76

Publish Date: 2017 01, Sun

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 30 views
Month 2: 32 views
Month 3: 37 views
Month 4: 48 views
Month 5: 50 views
Month 6: 25 views
Month 7: 53 views
Month 8: 29 views
Month 9: 36 views
Month 10: 39 views
Month 11: 31 views
Month 12: 43 views
Month 13: 35 views
Month 14: 31 views
Month 15: 38 views
Month 16: 43 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 22 views
Month 19: 41 views
Month 20: 26 views
Month 21: 33 views
Month 22: 39 views
Month 23: 25 views
Month 24: 29 views
Month 25: 34 views
Month 26: 27 views
Month 27: 29 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 34 views
Month 30: 16 views
Month 31: 13 views
Month 32: 29 views
Month 33: 29 views
Month 34: 30 views
Month 35: 28 views
Month 36: 34 views
Month 37: 35 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 33 views
Month 40: 11 views
Month 41: 21 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 33 views
Month 44: 19 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 38 views
Month 47: 28 views
Month 48: 20 views
Month 49: 22 views
Month 50: 38 views
Month 51: 38 views
Month 52: 35 views
Month 53: 28 views
Month 54: 40 views
Month 55: 35 views
Month 56: 32 views
Month 57: 32 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 13 views
Month 61: 35 views
Month 62: 32 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 39 views
Month 65: 39 views
Month 66: 20 views
Month 67: 32 views
Month 68: 30 views
Month 69: 39 views
Month 70: 27 views
Month 71: 29 views
Month 72: 30 views
Month 73: 32 views
Month 74: 34 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 14 views
Month 77: 48 views
Month 78: 42 views
Month 79: 31 views
Month 80: 38 views
Month 81: 31 views
Month 82: 29 views
Month 83: 14 views
Month 84: 43 views
Month 85: 24 views
Month 86: 27 views
Month 87: 23 views
Month 88: 12 views
Month 89: 35 views
Month 90: 46 views
Month 91: 37 views
Month 92: 42 views
Month 93: 21 views
Month 94: 31 views
Month 95: 47 views
Month 96: 17 views
Month 97: 27 views
Month 98: 39 views
Month 99: 16 views
Month 100: 26 views
Month 101: 49 views
Month 102: 45 views
Month 103: 30 views
Month 104: 33 views
Month 105: 29 views
Month 106: 30 views
Month 107: 16 views
Month 108: 48 views
Month 109: 17 views
Month 110: 30 views
Month 111: 17 views
Month 112: 37 views
Month 113: 20 views
Month 114: 21 views
Month 115: 36 views
Month 116: 49 views
Month 117: 62 views
Month 118: 32 views

Total Views: 881

Total Downloads: 76

All Trends