Reconstruction of Participatory Development Paradigm Based on Spiritual Principles for Improving the Social Welfare of Rural Communities

α
Peribadi
Peribadi
σ
Muhammad Arsyad
Muhammad Arsyad
ρ
La Ode Monto Bauto
La Ode Monto Bauto
Ѡ
Juhaepa
Juhaepa
¥
Tanzil
Tanzil

Send Message

To: Author

Reconstruction of Participatory Development Paradigm Based on Spiritual Principles for Improving the Social Welfare of Rural Communities

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

722G1

Reconstruction of Participatory Development Paradigm Based on Spiritual Principles for Improving the Social Welfare of Rural Communities Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

This study aims to develop a participatory development strategy based on IESQ Power in Konawe Selatan District Government of Indonesia. Therefore, the research process uses a participatory paradigm in the form of shallow and deep participation and creative participation to improve the welfare of rural communities.The result of research showed that the strategic formulation of participatory development based on IESQ Power is a synthetic process between the participatory development cycle with the six Pillars of Faith and five Pillars of Islam. Meanwhile, the construction of integrated rural development reflects the synergistic process between the participatory development paradigm and religious values, which are cored in IESQ Power and Revelation System. Thus, the use of the participatory development paradigm is not only integrated and interdependent between structural, cultural and spiritual approaches, however, the process of implementing participatory development in rural communities can also take place comprehensively and strategically and be carried out with a full sense of responsibility. In turn, however, it can also be a driving force for social worship that can increase internal motivation for actors in empowerment and other development programs.

Generating HTML Viewer...

References

43 Cites in Article
  1. H Ainissyifa (2019). Development strategy of islamic education institution.
  2. Seyed Alavion,Ahmad Taghdisi (2021). Rural E-marketing in Iran; Modeling villagers' intention and clustering rural regions.
  3. Nofa Alyanto,Deky (2021). Teisme, Mesianisme Dan Aksiologisme: Akomodasi Kitab Suci Kristen Terhadap Problema Kemiskinan Dan Pemiskinan.
  4. Annida (2020). Kebijakan Pembiayaan Kesehatan terhadap Masyarakat Miskin dalam Pencapaian Universal Health Coverage di Kabupaten Banjar.
  5. Mohd Awang,Abdul Ahmad,Mumpuniarti,Abdul Abdul Rahman (2019). Social integration practices among multi-ethnic youths.
  6. M Bottero,C D'alpaos,A Marello (2020). An application of the a'WOT analysis for the management of cultural heritage assets: The case of the historical farmhouses in the aglie castle (Turin).
  7. Concepción Campillo-Alhama,Alba-María Martínez-Sala (2019). Events 2.0 in the transmedia branding strategy of World Cultural Heritage Sites.
  8. Maria Cerreta,Eleonora Giovene Di Girasole,Giuliano Poli,Stefania Regalbuto (2020). Operationalizing the Circular City Model for Naples’ City-Port: A Hybrid Development Strategy.
  9. S Eleftheriadis,P Duffour,D Mumovic (2018). Participatory decision-support model in the context of building structural design embedding BIM with QFD.
  10. G Endfield (2012). The resilience and adaptive capacity of social-environmental systems in colonial Mexico.
  11. Arif Fadilla (2018). ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN DAN STRATEGI PENGENTASAN KEMISKINAN DI KOTA TANGERANG PROVINSI BANTEN.
  12. K Grimmer,J Moss,J Falco (2004). Experiences of elderly patients regarding independent community living after discharge from hospital: a longitudinal study.
  13. Dadang Hawari,E Iq,Cq & Sq Kriteria,Sumber Daya Manusia,; ) Berkualitas (2009). Unknown Title.
  14. Barraí Hennebry (2020). The determinants of economic resilience in rural regions. An examination of the Portuguese case.
  15. Knut Hidle (2019). How national parks change a rural municipality's development strategies – The Skjåk case, Norway.
  16. Zhengyue Jing,Yi Wang,Lulu Ding,Xue Tang,Yuejing Feng,Chengchao Zhou (2019). Effect of social integration on the establishment of health records among elderly migrants in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
  17. J Khan,R Hildingsson,L Garting (2020). Sustainable welfare in Swedish cities: Challenges of eco-social integration in urban sustainability governance.
  18. Kimberly Kleinhans (2019). The Logic Model, Participatory Evaluation and Out Of School Art Programs.
  19. Carlota Las Hayas,Irantzu Izco-Basurko,Ane Fullaondo,Silvia Gabrielli,Antoni Zwiefka,Odin Hjemdal,Dora Gudmundsdottir,Hans Knoop,Anna Olafsdottir,Valeria Donisi,Sara Carbone,Silvia Rizzi,Iwona Mazur,Anna Krolicka-Deregowska,Roxanna Morote,Frederick Anyan,Mette Ledertoug,Nina Tange,Ingibjorg Kaldalons,Bryndis Jonsdottir,Ana González-Pinto,Itziar Vergara,Nerea González,Javier Mar Medina,Esteban De Manuel Keenoy (2019). UPRIGHT, a resilience-based intervention to promote mental well-being in schools: study rationale and methodology for a European randomized controlled trial.
  20. Gregoire Leroy,Paul Boettcher,Badi Besbes,Carlos Peña,Florence Jaffrezic,Roswitha Baumung (2020). Food securers or invasive aliens? Trends and consequences of non-native livestock introgression in developing countries.
  21. Hanwei Li (2020). How to Retain Global Talent? Economic and Social Integration of Chinese Students in Finland.
  22. Anthony Maturo,Andrea Petrucci,Cesare Forzano,Giovanni Giuzio,Annamaria Buonomano,Andreas Athienitis (2021). Design and environmental sustainability assessment of energy-independent communities: The case study of a livestock farm in the North of Italy.
  23. Sol Mora (2018). Resistencias sociales a la cooperación de China en infraestructura: las represas Kirchner-Cepernic en Argentina.
  24. Meki Mulait (2018). MENGIMANI YESUS KRISTUS SANG PEMBEBAS: SUATU UPAYA BERKRISTOLOGI DALAM KONTEKS PEMISKINAN GEREJA INDONESIA.
  25. Alexandru Pavel,Bogdan Moldovan,Karima Kourtit,Peter Nijkamp (2020). Urban or Rural: Does It Make A Difference for Economic Resilience? A Modelling Study on Economic and Cultural Geography in Romania.
  26. S Pérez (2021). Manifestations of social resistance in craft processes iku, nasa and sami indigenous craft.
  27. Peribadi (2021). Strategi Pembangunan Partisipatif Menuju Desa Masa Depan.
  28. O Pretorius,E Drewes,M Aswegen,Van,G Malan (2021). A policy approach towards achieving regional economic resilience in developing countries: Evidence from the sadc.
  29. H Prime,M Wade,D Browne (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  30. Ariana Priyono,S Chandra,T Putra,L (2018). Effect of intellectual, emotional and spiritual intelligence toward productivity of employee.
  31. Andrea Rey-Martí,Millán Díaz-Foncea,Pilar Alguacil-Marí (2021). The determinants of social sustainability in work integration social enterprises: the effect of entrepreneurship.
  32. Ritzer,George (2013). Eksplorasi Dalam Teori Sosial: Dari Metateori sampai Rasionalisasi, diterjemahkan oleh Astry Fajria dari buku Explorations in Social Theory, From Metatheorizing to Rationalization.
  33. Fitra Rizal,Haniatul Mukaromah (2020). Filantropi Islam Solusi Atas Masalah Kemiskinan Akibat Pandemi Covid-19.
  34. E Rohana (2019). Character Education Relation with Spiritual Intelligence in Islamic Education Perspective.
  35. Abdul Sahar,Roy Salomo (2018). TATA KELOLA KOLABORATIF DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEMISKINAN DI KABUPATEN PINRANG.
  36. Kaela Schill,Susana Caxaj (2019). Cultural safety strategies for rural Indigenous palliative care: a scoping review.
  37. Ljiljana Simić (2020). The relevance of EU external cultural synergies.
  38. L Soegiono,A Atahau,Harijono,A Huruta (2019). Local wisdom in rural microfinance: A descriptive study on villagers of east sumba.
  39. Patricia Thomas,Hui Liu,Debra Umberson (2017). Family Relationships and Well-Being.
  40. Laura Thompson,Justin Lang,Brieanne Olibris,Amélie Gauthier-Beaupré,Heather Cook,Dakota Gillies,Heather Orpana (2020). Participatory model building for suicide prevention in Canada.
  41. Vasiliki Voukelatou,Lorenzo Gabrielli,Ioanna Miliou,Stefano Cresci,Rajesh Sharma,Maurizio Tesconi,Luca Pappalardo (2021). Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources.
  42. Nicole Zerrer,Ariane Sept (2020). Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas.
  43. Mohammad Zoladl,Solaiman Afroughi,Khairollah Nooryan,Shirali Kharamin,Amin Haghgoo,Yaghoub Parandvar (2020). Applying Collaborative Care Model on Intensive Caregiver Burden and Resilient Family Caregivers of Patients with Mental Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Peribadi. 2026. \u201cReconstruction of Participatory Development Paradigm Based on Spiritual Principles for Improving the Social Welfare of Rural Communities\u201d. Unknown Journal GJHSS-C Volume 24 (GJHSS Volume 24 Issue C2): .

Download Citation

Explores sustainable development for community welfare and environmental improvement.
Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 24 Issue C2
Pg. 51- 63
Journal Specifications
Keywords
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 2, 2024

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1076
Total Downloads: 40
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

This study aims to develop a participatory development strategy based on IESQ Power in Konawe Selatan District Government of Indonesia. Therefore, the research process uses a participatory paradigm in the form of shallow and deep participation and creative participation to improve the welfare of rural communities.The result of research showed that the strategic formulation of participatory development based on IESQ Power is a synthetic process between the participatory development cycle with the six Pillars of Faith and five Pillars of Islam. Meanwhile, the construction of integrated rural development reflects the synergistic process between the participatory development paradigm and religious values, which are cored in IESQ Power and Revelation System. Thus, the use of the participatory development paradigm is not only integrated and interdependent between structural, cultural and spiritual approaches, however, the process of implementing participatory development in rural communities can also take place comprehensively and strategically and be carried out with a full sense of responsibility. In turn, however, it can also be a driving force for social worship that can increase internal motivation for actors in empowerment and other development programs.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Reconstruction of Participatory Development Paradigm Based on Spiritual Principles for Improving the Social Welfare of Rural Communities

Peribadi
Peribadi
Muhammad Arsyad
Muhammad Arsyad
La Ode Monto Bauto
La Ode Monto Bauto
Juhaepa
Juhaepa
Tanzil
Tanzil

Research Journals