
Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
J94Q7
Choose where you want to hide AI Takeaway. Your site-wide choice will be remembered in this browser.
Due to inadequacy in mathematics, physicists failed to see Einstein’s errors. For instance, the Einstein equation has no bounded dynamic solution due to missing the gravitational wave energy-stress tensor with an antigravity coupling, his calculation of the perihelion of Mercury cannot be justified with perturbation, and he did not see that the photonic energy must include gravitational wave energy. To derive the photonic energy, general relativity must be used. Following Einstein faithfully, Hawking never produced any verifiable predictions. This is due to that E = mc2 is incon-sistent with the Einstein equation and is a major error. In fact, their space-time singularity theorems are based on invalid assumptions in physics, and thus the results are irrelevant. Einstein wrongly rejected the repulsive gravitation due to the charge-mass interaction. Experiments confirmed such errors, and the current-mass interaction implies that the weight of a magnet is directional. The repulsive gravitation implies to measure mass through gravity is invalid. He also failed to extend general relativity to a five-dimensional theory because of the need of unification between gravitation and electromagnetism. The hovering of a charged capacitor on earth is due to the repulsive gravitational force which cannot be screened. His covariance principle is proven invalid by explicit examples, and the physical Riemannian space with a Euclidean-like structure is different from a mathematical Riemannian space embedded in a higher dimensional Euclidean space. This error has misinterpreted the Hubble’s law as evidence for an expanding universe.
C. Lo. 2019. "Rectifications of Einsteins Errors such as E = mc2 and Necessity of Extending General Relativity". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 19 (GJSFR Volume 19 Issue A3).
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR
Print ISSN 0975-5896
e-ISSN 2249-4626
v1.2
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
Total Score: 145
Country: Unknown
Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research
Authors: C. Y. Lo (PhD/Dr. count: 0)
View Count (all-time): 256
Total Views (Real + Logic): 548
Total Downloads (simulated): 40
Publish Date: 2019 05, Tue
Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site performance, understand traffic, and enhance your publishing experience. Cookie Policy
Choose which optional cookies Global Journals can use. Your preference applies across this platform and can be updated any time.
These cookies are required for core website functionality and security.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.