Regret and Responsibility: A Discourse Analysis of CEO Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management

Article ID

O05XP

Regret and Responsibility: A Discourse Analysis of CEO Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management

Dr.  Constantin Ilas
Dr. Constantin Ilas
DOI

Abstract

This study investigates the rhetorical strategies employed in public CEO apologies issued in response to major corporate crises between 2010 and 2024. Drawing from a corpus of ten high-profile apology statements—including video transcripts, written releases, and interview excerpts—this paper applies a combined framework of Appraisal Theory and Image Repair Theory to analyze how top executives linguistically construct responsibility, express regret, and attempt to repair stakeholder trust. The findings reveal consistent patterns in evaluative language use, responsibility-taking, emotional appeals, and institutional ethos. Variations in tone, modality, and audience engagement across industries are also examined. By situating these discursive features within the broader context of crisis management and leadership communication, this study offers interdisciplinary insights into how language functions as a managerial tool for damage control and reputational rehabilitation. Implications for ethical leadership, corporate transparency, and strategic communication training are discussed, with a focus on how Business English and management education can integrate such discourse analysis for future leaders.

Regret and Responsibility: A Discourse Analysis of CEO Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management

This study investigates the rhetorical strategies employed in public CEO apologies issued in response to major corporate crises between 2010 and 2024. Drawing from a corpus of ten high-profile apology statements—including video transcripts, written releases, and interview excerpts—this paper applies a combined framework of Appraisal Theory and Image Repair Theory to analyze how top executives linguistically construct responsibility, express regret, and attempt to repair stakeholder trust. The findings reveal consistent patterns in evaluative language use, responsibility-taking, emotional appeals, and institutional ethos. Variations in tone, modality, and audience engagement across industries are also examined. By situating these discursive features within the broader context of crisis management and leadership communication, this study offers interdisciplinary insights into how language functions as a managerial tool for damage control and reputational rehabilitation. Implications for ethical leadership, corporate transparency, and strategic communication training are discussed, with a focus on how Business English and management education can integrate such discourse analysis for future leaders.

Dr.  Constantin Ilas
Dr. Constantin Ilas

No Figures found in article.

Dr. Constantin Ilas. 2026. “. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology – G: Interdisciplinary GJMBR-G Volume 25 (GJMBR Volume 25 Issue G1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Classification
Not Found
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 158
Total Downloads: 42
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Regret and Responsibility: A Discourse Analysis of CEO Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management

Dr.  Constantin Ilas
Dr. Constantin Ilas

Research Journals