Relationshipsamong Perceptual Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement of Students at Woldia College of Teachers Education, Ethiopia

Relationshipsamong Perceptual Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement of Students at Woldia College of Teachers Education, Ethiopia

Melese Astatke Alem

Contact

α Woldia University

Relationshipsamong Perceptual Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement of Students at Woldia College of Teachers Education, Ethiopia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6LBPO

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine if there are significant relationships among perceptual learning styles preferences and academic achievement of students. A sample size of 283 participants among 972 first year students at Woldia College of teachers’ education, Ethiopia in 2016/2017were selected using stratified and simple random sampling techniques. The study employed quantitative approach which followed a correlational design involving two instruments to collect data for the study: Questionnaires (perceptual learning styles inventory related to auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles)and document analysis. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and independent samples t-test were used to analyze data. The Pearson correlation analysis reported a significant positive relationship between students’ perceptual learning styles preferences and academic achievement. The independent samples t-test result indicated that there was statistically significant difference between male and female students mean scores in kinesthetic learning style. In other words, male students mean score (M=2.7671, p

References

15 Cites in Article

Reference Format

I Alkhasawneh,M Mrayyan,C Docherty,S Alashram,H Yousef (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): assessing students' learning preferences using VARK.
J Bill (1998). Problems in statistics: learning style, age, and part time students.
R Choudhary,P Dullo,R Tandon (2011). Gender differences in learning style preferences of first year medical students.
J Cuaresma (2008). Learning style preferences and academic performance of PHEM majors at the University of Cordilleras.
Peter Cuthbert (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches?.
J Dobson (2009). Learning style preferences and course performance in an undergraduate physiology class.
John Dobson (2010). A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance.
D Hargreaves (2005). About Learning: Report of the Learning Working Group.
Glennd Israel (2009). Determining Sample Size.
J Keefe (1987). Leadership Theory and School Practice.
D Kolb (1984). Experimental learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
M Lehman (2011). Relationships of learning styles, grade, and Instructional preferences.
Z Rao (2001). Matching teaching styles with learning styles in east asian contexts.
J Turnbull (2009). Coaching for Learning.
Rathnakar Urval,Ashwin Kamath,Sheetal Ullal,Ashok Shenoy,Nandita Shenoy,Laxminarayana Udupa (2014). Assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students using the VARK questionnaire and the influence of sex and academic performance.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Melese Astatke Alem. 2018. \u201cRelationshipsamong Perceptual Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement of Students at Woldia College of Teachers Education, Ethiopia\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 18 (GJHSS Volume 18 Issue G4): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 18 Issue G4
Pg. 33- 38

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 130199

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 2, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 71

Country: Ethiopia

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education

Authors: Melese Astatke Alem (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 190

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3409

Total Downloads (simulated): 1551

Publish Date: 2018 05, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 48 views
Month 2: 22 views
Month 3: 48 views
Month 4: 66 views
Month 5: 53 views
Month 6: 43 views
Month 7: 45 views
Month 8: 41 views
Month 9: 43 views
Month 10: 32 views
Month 11: 32 views
Month 12: 24 views
Month 13: 28 views
Month 14: 26 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 30 views
Month 17: 40 views
Month 18: 42 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 16 views
Month 21: 19 views
Month 22: 36 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 15 views
Month 25: 40 views
Month 26: 41 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 37 views
Month 29: 36 views
Month 30: 34 views
Month 31: 35 views
Month 32: 27 views
Month 33: 13 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 33 views
Month 36: 23 views
Month 37: 42 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 28 views
Month 40: 25 views
Month 41: 30 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 17 views
Month 44: 33 views
Month 45: 21 views
Month 46: 45 views
Month 47: 24 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 39 views
Month 51: 14 views
Month 52: 37 views
Month 53: 31 views
Month 54: 22 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 20 views
Month 57: 19 views
Month 58: 38 views
Month 59: 28 views
Month 60: 35 views
Month 61: 37 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 36 views
Month 64: 25 views
Month 65: 25 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 20 views
Month 68: 23 views
Month 69: 17 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 45 views
Month 72: 27 views
Month 73: 31 views
Month 74: 45 views
Month 75: 37 views
Month 76: 25 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 38 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 38 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 30 views
Month 84: 37 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 44 views
Month 87: 24 views
Month 88: 35 views
Month 89: 32 views
Month 90: 69 views
Month 91: 71 views
Month 92: 56 views
Month 93: 75 views
Month 94: 57 views
Month 95: 46 views
Month 96: 43 views

Total Views: 3409

Total Downloads: 1551

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]