Relative Performance and Karnal Bunt Infestation of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L. Em. Thell.) Accessions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

§ B. R. D. P. G. College Deoria

Send Message

To: Author

Relative Performance and Karnal Bunt Infestation of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum  L. Em. Thell.) Accessions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

KPAN9

Relative Performance and Karnal Bunt Infestation of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum  L. Em. Thell.) Accessions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background

Abstract

Twenty wheat accessions were evaluated on 11 parameters in an experiment at Center for Research and Development (CRD), Gaunar, Usaraha, Gorakhpur, U. P. in a randomized block design with three replications. The objectives of the experiment were to assess the relative performance of the accessions on various parameters and extent of Karnal bunt (KB) infestation. Normalized cumulative ranks were used to assess the relative performance of accessions. KOH seed soaking technique was used to assess the extent of Karnal bunt infestation. Based on normalized accumulating ranks the performance order of wheat accessions is BHU-25, HPST-16-17-16, HPAN-101,HPAN-57, PBW-677, CRD Gehu 1, BHU-31, ANKUR, HPST-16-17-07, HPAN-111, HPAN-127, HPAN-65, HPST-16-17-15, PBW-Zn 1, HPAN-42, HPAN-164, HD-2967, WB-02, ZINCOL and HPAN-147. All the 20 accessions of wheat were susceptible to Karnal bunt and infestation ranged from 3.67% (HPST-16-17-15) to 70.33% (HPAN-147).

I. INTRODUCTION

Wheat is a very staple food crop of people in the world. However its production is limited by nonavailability of suitable varieties and infestation of diseases and pests. Therefore, plant breeders' duty is to provide suitable varieties to farmers so that food production and food security can be insured. With these facts in mind, we evaluated 20-wheat accessions on 11 parameters including a test for Karnal bunt infestation. The present paper reports the findings of this experiment.

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was conducted in Rabi season 2019-20 at Center for Research and Development located at Gaunar-Usaraha, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. The experimental site is located at 26 42 45.5 N latitude, 83 36 36.6 E longitude and 86 m above mean sea level. The climate is semi-arid with hot summer and cold winter. Nearly 80 % of the rainfall is received during monsoon and a few winter showers.

Twenty wheat germplasm, included in this experiment, were taken from the germplasm stock available at CRD and BRD PG College, Deoria. HD2967 was used as a standard check variety. These accessions were raised in a randomized block design in a timely sown condition with standard package of practices for wheat cultivation. Thus, 20 genotypes were evaluated on 11 parameters in three replications. The parameters evaluated are 1. 1000 seed weight or test weight, 2. 10 spikes' weight, 3. yield per plot, 4. spikes per square meter, 5. effective tillers, 6. Plant height, 7. yield per hectare, 8. biological yield per plant, 9. days to 50 % flowering, 10. flag leaf area and 11. Karnal bunt infestation.

Data collected on five randomly selected plants of all 20 genotypes were compiled to calculate means in three replications. These were further used to calculate replication mean. These values were subjected to normalized cumulative rank (NCR) analysis as discussed by Singh and co-workers in many papers (Sanoj Kumar 2021; Singh 2017; Singh et al. 2018; Yadav et al. 2020). The idea of this analysis came from the concept of crop ideotype as given by Donald 1968. That is why, in this analysis, we are looking for ideal plant types (=crop ideotypes) that would rank relatively well or first in all parameters.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1 shows the average values of the replications.

Table 11281: Table 1: Average Values of Three Replications
S.N.Variety ↓ Sort Order→Test Weight10 Spike WeightYield/ plotSpikes/ m2Effective TillersPlant HeightYield/ haBiological Yield/ PlantD2-50%FFlag Leaf AreaKarnal Bunt
00000000111
1HPST-16-17-0741.3324.672.01529.674.47110.225.1717.68334.7613.33
2HPST-16-17-1535.3328.671.754294.53104.5321.8321.338343.973.67
3HPST-16-17-1639.33301.92569.674.8109.1323.9620.538331.275
4BHU-254033.332.38629.675.3393.1729.7124.678429.868
5BHU-3142.6734.672.51536.674.494.3331.3317.3385.6736.799
6ZINCOL36.6731.331.564393.73103.9319.4617.879132.016.67
7ANKUR40.67301.724514.53105.921.4619.738734.724.67
8PBW-Zn 138.6727.331.88464.334.53105.4323.518.48338.9118.33
9WB-023825.331.67684.334.498.320.9217.28337.2110
10HPAN-10144242.225525.2104.7727.7128.138733.857.67
11HPAN-14746261.16589.674.4790.6914.5417.879138.4970.33
12HPAN-16435.3325.331.925863.73102.223.9619.078736.67.33
13HPAN-423829.332.77486.674.47103.834.6316.478553.0310.33
14HPAN-5743.3328.671.83559.334.699.922.8221.878334.997.33
15HPAN-6536.6732.672.84854.33104.53520.88640.7721
16HPAN-11142242.31506.335.53101.0328.88228740.1416.67
17HPAN-12743.3327.332.27553.334.499.728.3319.287409
18CRD Gehu 156.6729.331.69272.677.93112.5321.1545.67961.068
19PBW-67742.6726.672.94480.335.33102.2336.7521.68741.916
20HD-29674027.332.13433595.626.6717.738739.6532.67
Table 11280: Table 2: Ranks, CR and NCR Values of Genotypes
S.N.Variety ↓ Sort Order→Test Weight10 Spike WeightYield/ plotSpikes/ m2Effective TillersPlant HeightYield/ haBiological Yield/ PlantD2-50%FFlag Leaf AreaKarnal BuntCRNCR
00000000111
1HPST-16-17-079181010122101726151111.63
2HPST-16-17-1519915199715721811211.78
3HPST-16-17-1613511573119223711.04
4BHU-251125231953819681
5BHU-3161491518418109111051.54
6ZINCOL1741917199191419351452.13
7ANKUR105161694161012521051.54
8PBW-Zn 114111315951313212171241.82
9WB-02151618115161819210131432.1
10HPAN-1013198856821248831.22
11HPAN-147215203122020141911201562.29
12HPAN-16419161141912111212861301.91
13HPAN-421573121210320919141241.82
14HPAN-5749146814145276891.31
15HPAN-65173213188281116181161.71
16HPAN-111819611213641215161121.65
17HPAN-1274117715157111214111141.68
18CRD Gehu 1171720111711209951.4
19PBW-6776141143111612174891.31
20HD-296711119186179161213191412.07
Table 11279: Table 3: Ranks, CR and NCR Similar to Table 2, but the Data are Sorted in Increasing Order based on CR or NCR
S.N.Variety ↓ Sort Order→Test Weight10 Spike WeightYield/ plotSpikes/ m2Effective TillersPlant HeightYield/ haBiological Yield/ PlantD2-50%FFlag Leaf AreaKarnal BuntCRNCR
00000000111
1BHU-251125231953819681
2HPST-16-17-1613511573119223711.04
3HPAN-1013198856821248831.22
4HPAN-5749146814145276891.31
5PBW-6776141143111612174891.31
6CRD Gehu 1171720111711209951.4
7BHU-3161491518418109111051.54
8ANKUR105161694161012521051.54
9HPST-16-17-079181010122101726151111.63
10HPAN-111819611213641215161121.65
11HPAN-1274117715157111214111141.68
12HPAN-65173213188281116181161.71
13HPST-16-17-1519915199715721811211.78
14PBW-Zn 114111315951313212171241.82
15HPAN-421573121210320919141241.82
16HPAN-16419161141912111212861301.91
17HD-296711119186179161213191412.07
18WB-02151618115161819210131432.1
19ZINCOL1741917199191419351452.13
20HPAN-147215203122020141911201562.29

Top few accessions of table 3 could be recommended for cultivation as they might be close to ideal plant type we are looking for. From table 3, it is clear that top 5 or 6 genotypes viz., BHU-25, HPST-16-17-16, HPAN-101, HPAN-57, PBW-677 and CRD Gehun-1 could be recommended to farmers for cultivation in this region. Standard check variety HD2967 is lagging far behind on 17th position in table 3. Therefore, top varieties are highly likely to replace the current standard check variety HD-2967gradually. However, it is also clear from table 1, 2 and 3 that none of these varieties are completely resistant to Karnal bunt. The extent of Karnal bunt infestation is ranging from 3.67 % to 70.3 % . In worst case scenario, the less infested varieties with high relative performance could be recommended for cultivation. However, in a similar study at the same research station, another researcher

(Sanoj Kumar 2021, personal communication) has found four accessions completely resistant to Karnal bunt out of 20 screened accessions. These are HPYT-409, HPAN-153, HPYT-489 and HPYT 490. These varieties, totally resistant to Karnal bunt, should be recommended for cultivation in this region. Karnal bunt has shown its presence in this region and it should be controlled in its initial stages.

This analysis is shown step by step for the comprehension of students, but to be precise, table 1 and table 2 could be merged into a single table and again the data could be sorted in increasing order based on CR or NCR. Thus, the whole paper could be summarized in a single table as given in table 4. This is being referred to as precise varietal recommender system.

Table 11278: Table 4: Precise Varietal Recommender System
S.N.Variety ↓ Sort Order→Test Weight10 Spike WeightYield/ plotSpikes/ m2Effective TillersPlant HeightYield/ haBiological Yield/ PlantD2-50%FFlag Leaf AreaKarnal BuntCRNCR
00000000111
1BHU-2540 (11)33.33 (2)2.38 (5)629.67 (2)5.33 (3)93.17 (19)29.71 (5)24.67 (3)84 (8)29.86 (1)8 (9)681
2HPST-16-17-1639.33 (13)30 (5)1.92 (11)569.67 (5)4.8 (7)109.13 (3)23.96 (11)20.53 (9)83 (2)31.27 (2)5 (3)711.04
3HPAN-10144 (3)24 (19)2.22 (8)552 (8)5.2 (5)104.77 (6)27.71 (8)28.13 (2)87 (12)33.85 (4)7.67 (8)831.22
4HPAN-5743.33 (4)28.67 (9)1.83 (14)559.33 (6)4.6 (8)99.9 (14)22.82 (14)21.87 (5)83 (2)34.99 (7)7.33 (6)891.31
5PBW-67742.67 (6)26.67 (14)2.94 (1)480.33 (14)5.33 (3)102.23 (11)36.75 (1)21.6 (6)87 (12)41.91 (17)6 (4)891.31
6CRD Gehu 156.67 (1)29.33 (7)1.69 (17)272.67 (20)7.93 (1)112.53 (1)21.15 (17)45.6 (1)79 (1)61.06 (20)8 (9)951.4
7BHU-3142.67 (6)34.67 (1)2.51 (4)536.67 (9)4.4 (15)94.33 (18)31.33 (4)17.33 (18)85.67 (10)36.79 (9)9 (11)1051.54
8ANKUR40.67 (10)30 (5)1.72 (16)451 (16)4.53 (9)105.9 (4)21.46 (16)19.73 (10)87 (12)34.72 (5)4.67 (2)1051.54
9HPST-16-17-0741.33 (9)24.67 (18)2.01 (10)529.67 (10)4.47 (12)110.2 (2)25.17 (10)17.6 (17)83 (2)34.76 (6)13.33 (15)1111.63
10HPAN-11142 (8)24 (19)2.31 (6)506.33 (11)5.53 (2)101.03 (13)28.88 (6)22 (4)87 (12)40.14 (15)16.67 (16)1121.65
11HPAN-12743.33 (4)27.33 (11)2.27 (7)553.33 (7)4.4 (15)99.7 (15)28.33 (7)19.2 (11)87 (12)40 (14)9 (11)1141.68
12HPAN-6536.67 (17)32.67 (3)2.8 (2)485 (13)4.33 (18)104.5 (8)35 (2)20.8 (8)86 (11)40.77 (16)21 (18)1161.71
13HPST-16-17-1535.33 (19)28.67 (9)1.75 (15)429 (19)4.53 (9)104.53 (7)21.83 (15)21.33 (7)83 (2)43.97 (18)3.67 (1)1211.78
14PBW-Zn 138.67 (14)27.33 (11)1.88 (13)464.33 (15)4.53 (9)105.43 (5)23.5 (13)18.4 (13)83 (2)38.91 (12)18.33 (17)1241.82
15HPAN-4238 (15)29.33 (7)2.77 (3)486.67 (12)4.47 (12)103.8 (10)34.63 (3)16.47 (20)85 (9)53.03 (19)10.33 (14)1241.82
16HPAN-16435.33 (19)25.33 (16)1.92 (11)586 (4)3.73 (19)102.2 (12)23.96 (11)19.07 (12)87 (12)36.6 (8)7.33 (6)1301.91
17HD-296740 (11)27.33 (11)2.13 (9)433 (18)5 (6)95.6 (17)26.67 (9)17.73 (16)87 (12)39.65 (13)32.67 (19)1412.07
18WB-0238 (15)25.33 (16)1.67 (18)684.33 (1)4.4 (15)98.3 (16)20.92 (18)17.2 (19)83 (2)37.21 (10)10 (13)1432.1
19ZINCOL36.67 (17)31.33 (4)1.56 (19)439 (17)3.73 (19)103.93 (9)19.46 (19)17.87 (14)91 (19)32.01 (3)6.67 (5)1452.13
20HPAN-14746 (2)26 (15)1.16 (20)589.67 (3)4.47 (12)90.69 (20)14.54 (20)17.87 (14)91 (19)38.49 (11)70.33 (20)1562.29

References

5 Cites in Article
  1. C Donald (1968). The breeding of crop ideotypes.
  2. Raj Yadav,Devendra Yadav,Aditya Sharma,Shailendra Mishra (2021). BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDES AGAINST BLISTER BEETLE AND POD SUCKING BUG IN PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS CAJAN L. MILLSP.).
  3. S Singh (2017). Normalized Cumulative Ranks for Plant Breeding: An Example.
  4. S Singh,R Sahu,Tarkeshwar (2018). Selection from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) accessions through normalized cumulative ranks.
  5. Taramani Yadav,Gajender Yadav,Ashwani Kumar,Dinesh Kumar,R Yadav (2020). Salicylic acid and thiourea mitigate salinity and drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum).

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Rajesh Kumar,, Shri Niwas Singh, Sanoj Kumar, Baij Nath Singh. 2026. "Relative Performance and Karnal Bunt Infestation of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L. Em. Thell.) Accessions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 23 (GJSFR Volume 23 Issue D4).

Download Citation

Alt text: Wheat with relative performance and burnt infestation analysis in a research study.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification FOR Code: 0703
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
November 16, 2023

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 288
Total Downloads: 21
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Relative Performance and Karnal Bunt Infestation of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L. Em. Thell.) Accessions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh.

Rajesh Kumar,
Rajesh Kumar, B. R. D. P. G. College Deoria
Shri Singh
Shri Singh
Sanoj Kumar
Sanoj Kumar
Baij Singh
Baij Singh