Requirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development

Requirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development

Muhammad Yaseen

Contact

Umar Farooq

Contact

α University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar

Requirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE4ZOO5

Requirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Contxext: Requirement elicitation is difficult and critical phase of requirement engineering and the case is worst in global software development (GSD). The study is about requirement elicitation in the context of GSD. Objective: Development of requirement elicitation model (REM) which can address the factors that have positive impact and the factors that have negative impact during elicitation in GSD. The propose model will give solutions and practices to the challenges during elicitation. Method: Systematic literature review (SLR) and empirical research study will be used for achieving the goals and objectives. Expected Outcomes: The expected results of this study will be REM that will help vendor organizations for better elicitation during GSD.

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Dhirendra Pandey,U Suman,A Ramani (2010). An Effective Requirement Engineering Process Model for Software Development and Requirements Management.
W Lloyd,M Rosson,J Arthur (2002). Effectiveness of elicitation techniques in distributed requirements engineering.
S Kumari,A Pillai (2013). A survey on global requirements elicitation issues and proposed research framework.
Marjo Kauppinen,Matti Vartiainen,Jyrki Kontio,Sari Kujala,Reijo Sulonen (2004). Implementing requirements engineering processes throughout organizations: success factors and challenges.
B Arthi (2009). Distributed Requirements Negotiations Using Mixed Media.
N Sabahat,F Iqbal,F Azam,M Javed (2010). An iterative approach for global requirements elicitation: A case study analysis.
Azeem Ahmad,Aamir Shahzad,V Padmanabhuni,Ali Mansoor,Sushma Joseph,Zaki Arshad (2011). Requirements prioritization with respect to Geographically Distributed Stakeholders.
Muhammad Yaseen,Samad Baseer,Salman Sherin (2015). Critical challenges for requirement implementation in context of global software development: A systematic literature review.
T Illes-Seifert,A Herrmann,M Geisser,T Hildenbrand (2007). The Challenges of Distributed Software Engineering and Requirements Engineering: Results of an Online Survey.
Miguel Romero,Aurora Vizcaíno,Mario Piattini (2009). Teaching Requirements Elicitation within the Context of Global Software Development.
Bin Wen,Ziqiang Luo,Peng Liang (2012). Distributed and Collaborative Requirements Elicitation Based on Social Intelligence.
Gabriela Aranda,Aurora Vizcaíno,Alejandra Cechich,Mario Piattini (2008). Strategies to Minimize Problems in Global Requirements Elicitation.
Fabio Calefato,Daniela Damian,Filippo Lanubile (2012). Computer-mediated communication to support distributed requirements elicitations and negotiations tasks.
Sikandar Ali,Siffat Khan (2014). Critical Success Factors for Software Outsourcing Partnership (SOP): A Systematic Literature Review.
B Kitchenham,C Charters (2007). Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE).
Sikandar Ali,Siffat Khan (2014). Software Outsourcing Partnership(SOP): A Systematic Literature Review Protocol with Preliminary Results.
M Yaseen,S Baseer,S Ali,S Khan Requirement Implementation Model (RIM) in the Context of Global Software Development.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Muhammad Yaseen. 2018. \u201cRequirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 18 (GJCST Volume 18 Issue C2): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 18 Issue C2
Pg. 37- 41

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-C Classification: D.2.1

Submission ReceivedDecember 15, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 25, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Pakistan

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering

Authors: Muhammad Yaseen, Umar Farooq (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 234

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5931

Total Downloads (simulated): 1550

Publish Date: 2018 05, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 32 views
Month 2: 17 views
Month 3: 27 views
Month 4: 58 views
Month 5: 40 views
Month 6: 25 views
Month 7: 37 views
Month 8: 52 views
Month 9: 39 views
Month 10: 38 views
Month 11: 25 views
Month 12: 27 views
Month 13: 33 views
Month 14: 34 views
Month 15: 29 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 21 views
Month 18: 34 views
Month 19: 32 views
Month 20: 15 views
Month 21: 26 views
Month 22: 21 views
Month 23: 34 views
Month 24: 30 views
Month 25: 26 views
Month 26: 13 views
Month 27: 25 views
Month 28: 16 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 32 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 32 views
Month 33: 30 views
Month 34: 15 views
Month 35: 17 views
Month 36: 30 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 26 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 24 views
Month 43: 29 views
Month 44: 26 views
Month 45: 47 views
Month 46: 20 views
Month 47: 30 views
Month 48: 39 views
Month 49: 25 views
Month 50: 25 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 46 views
Month 53: 31 views
Month 54: 24 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 39 views
Month 57: 10 views
Month 58: 41 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 31 views
Month 61: 48 views
Month 62: 21 views
Month 63: 34 views
Month 64: 26 views
Month 65: 33 views
Month 66: 42 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 22 views
Month 69: 38 views
Month 70: 26 views
Month 71: 39 views
Month 72: 43 views
Month 73: 25 views
Month 74: 36 views
Month 75: 41 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 34 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 24 views
Month 80: 21 views
Month 81: 18 views
Month 82: 31 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 24 views
Month 85: 32 views
Month 86: 32 views
Month 87: 14 views
Month 88: 20 views
Month 89: 31 views
Month 90: 47 views
Month 91: 39 views
Month 92: 47 views
Month 93: 64 views
Month 94: 32 views
Month 95: 36 views

Total Views: 5931

Total Downloads: 1550

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]