Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Cutting Board by using ATP Inspection - Comparison of Vegetable Cutting Board and Meat Cutting Board

Naomi Katayama; Mayumi Hirabayashi; Akemi Ito; Shoko Kondo; Yui Nakayama; Ayari Naka

Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Cutting Board by using ATP Inspection – Comparison of Vegetable Cutting Board and Meat Cutting Board

Naomi Katayama * §

Contact

Mayumi Hirabayashi

Contact

Akemi Ito

Contact

Shoko Kondo

Contact

Yui Nakayama

Contact

Ayari Naka

Contact

§ Nagoya Womenâ€™s University

Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Cutting Board by using ATP Inspection – Comparison of Vegetable Cutting Board and Meat Cutting Board

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MR2QH8Q

Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Cutting Board by using ATP Inspection – Comparison of Vegetable Cutting Board and Meat Cutting Board Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

Abstract

Since bacteria grow in high temperature and high humidity, bacterial food poisoning frequently occurs from the rainy season to summer. In Japan, the number of food poisoning cases is high from June to October. Maintaining a hygienic environment in the kitchen is very important for preventing food poisoning. In particular, cutting boards on which various foods are places may cause secondary pollution. Therefore, to avoid food poisoning, this study compared the ATP value of the cutting board before and after the hygiene education using the ATP wiping test and investigated the educational effect. Before hygiene education, the inspector conducted an ATP wiping test on the cutting boards for vegetables and meat that washed before and after cooking and notified the cooks of the values. The inspector conducted hygiene education while showing the cook how to clean the cutting board. The cutting board washed with detergent and sponge, rinsed with running water for 30 seconds or more, then this process was repeated twice.

References

8 Cites in Article

Reference Format

N Nante,E Ceriale,G Messina,D Lenzi,P Manzi (2017). Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review.
E Amodio,C Dubi (2014). Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing h eclealiness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature (1990-2012).
H Aycieck,U Oquz,K Karci (2006). Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional ygiene swabbing methods for the deteminaton of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen.
Andrea Osimani,Cristiana Garofalo,Francesca Clementi,Stefano Tavoletti,Lucia Aquilanti (2014). Bioluminescence ATP Monitoring for the Routine Assessment of Food Contact Surface Cleanliness in a University Canteen.
Jee Lee (2018). An Investigation of Factors that Influence Hygiene Practices at a Small Day Care Center.
Philip Stanley (1989). A review of bioluminescent ATP techniques in rapid microbiology.
C Stannard,P Gibbs (1986). Rapid microbiology: Applications of bioluminescence in the food industry a review.
C Griffith,R Cooper,J Gilmore,C Davies,M Lewis (2000). An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Naomi Katayama, Mayumi Hirabayashi, Akemi Ito, Shoko Kondo, Yui Nakayama, Ayari Naka. 2020. "Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Cutting Board by using ATP Inspection – Comparison of Vegetable Cutting Board and Meat Cutting Board". Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue K5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 20 Issue K5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmr

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-K Classification NLMC Code: WA 4

Submission ReceivedDecember 12, 2019
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2020
Published January 15, 2020

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 28, 2020

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 194

Country: Japan

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research

Authors: Naomi Katayama, Mayumi Hirabayashi, Akemi Ito, Shoko Kondo, Yui Nakayama, Ayari Naka, Natuki Sasaki, Moe Inuzuka, Takashi Tamura (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 192

Total Views (Real + Logic): 656

Total Downloads (simulated): 44

Publish Date: 2020 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 65 views
Month 2: 38 views
Month 3: 55 views
Month 4: 55 views
Month 5: 46 views
Month 6: 43 views
Month 7: 18 views
Month 8: 31 views
Month 9: 36 views
Month 10: 39 views
Month 11: 17 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 26 views
Month 14: 13 views
Month 15: 39 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 39 views
Month 18: 38 views
Month 19: 45 views
Month 20: 35 views
Month 21: 29 views
Month 22: 16 views
Month 23: 21 views
Month 24: 27 views
Month 25: 12 views
Month 26: 41 views
Month 27: 13 views
Month 28: 39 views
Month 29: 18 views
Month 30: 19 views
Month 31: 27 views
Month 32: 39 views
Month 33: 35 views
Month 34: 24 views
Month 35: 18 views
Month 36: 36 views
Month 37: 36 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 33 views
Month 40: 15 views
Month 41: 14 views
Month 42: 37 views
Month 43: 39 views
Month 44: 39 views
Month 45: 39 views
Month 46: 24 views
Month 47: 39 views
Month 48: 29 views
Month 49: 29 views
Month 50: 43 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 32 views
Month 54: 18 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 37 views
Month 57: 28 views
Month 58: 41 views
Month 59: 38 views
Month 60: 25 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 32 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 34 views
Month 65: 42 views
Month 66: 30 views
Month 67: 13 views
Month 68: 25 views
Month 69: 32 views
Month 70: 20 views
Month 71: 52 views
Month 72: 29 views
Month 73: 33 views
Month 74: 36 views
Month 75: 25 views
Month 76: 42 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 28 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 26 views
Month 81: 42 views

Total Views: 656

Total Downloads: 44

All Trends