Role of Antenatal Screening for Congenital Anomalies by Grey Scale Ultrasound to Reduce the Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity

Role of Antenatal Screening for Congenital Anomalies by Grey Scale Ultrasound to Reduce the Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity

Dr. Rubina Mukhtar

Contact

Mukhtar Hussain

Contact

M. Ahmad Mukhtar

Contact

Isharat Sherood

Contact

Rubaida Mehmood

Contact

M. Saqib Khan

Contact

Nishtar Univerisity

Role of Antenatal Screening for Congenital Anomalies by Grey Scale Ultrasound to Reduce the Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3T7G0

Role of Antenatal Screening for Congenital Anomalies by Grey Scale Ultrasound to Reduce the Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

24 Cites in Article

Reference Format

R Karim,S Wahab,R Akhtar,F Jamala,S Jabeen (2014). Frequency and pattern of distribution of antenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies and the associated risk factors.
C Boyle,J Cordero (2005). Birth defects and disabilities: a public health issue for the 21 st century.
Mohammad Raza,Asfandyar Sheikh,Syed Ahmed,Sajid Ali,Syed Naqvi (2012). Risk factors associated with birth defects at a tertiary care center in Pakistan.
S Gillani,Nhs Kazmi,S Najeeb,S Hussain,A Raza (2011). Frequencies of congenital anomalies among newborns admitted in nursery of ayub teaching hospital abbottabad, pakistan.
M Canfield,M Honein,N Yuskiv,J Xing,C T Mai,J S Collins (2006). National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999-2001.
Z Patel,R Adhia (2005). Birth defects surveillance study.
Control Cf,D,Prevention (2006). Improved National Prevalence Estimates for 18 Selected Major Birth Defects--United States, 1999-2001.
Shi Wen,Shiliang Liu,K Joseph,Jocelyn Rouleau,Alexander Allen (2000). Patterns of infant mortality caused by major congenital anomalies.
G Qazi (2010). Relationship of selected prenatal factors to pregnancy outcome and congenital anomalies.
A Tomatir,H Demirhan,H Sorkun,A Koksal,F Ozerdem,N Cilengir (2009). Major congenital anomalies: a five-year retrospective regional study in Turkey.
N Alia,I Ahmed,A Mahais,N Perveen (2010). Congenital anomalies: prevalence of congenital abnormalities in 2nd trimester of pregnancy in madina teaching hospital, faisalabad on gray scale ultrasound.
S Dastgiri,D Stone,C Le-Ha,W Gilmour (2002). Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow, UK.
Mh B M Carvalho,M Brizot,L M Lopes,C Chiba,S Miyadahira,M Zugaib (2002). Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan.
S Pitukkijronnakorn,A Chittacharoen,T Jetsawangsri,P Panburana,A Jaovisidha,R Roungsipragarn (2009). Antenatal Detection of Congenital Malformations by Routine Ultrasonography.
Helen Dolk,Maria Loane,Ester Garne (2010). The Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in Europe.
Warren Hern (2014). Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination.
N Naveen,B Murlimanju,Vishal Kumar,Thejodhar Pulakunta,H Jeeyar (2011). Thanatophoric Dysplasia: A Rare Entity.
N Smith,A Smith (2002). Ultrasound for Congenital Fetal Anomalies.
K Fatemaq,F Begum,N Akter,Smm Zaman (2011). Major Congenital Malformations Among The Newborns in BSMMU Hospital.
Sunethri Padma,Jijiya Bai P,Ramana Pv (2011). Pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in stillborns: A hospital based prospective study.
N Naghshin,K Yazdani,N Tayebi (2010). The Prevalence of Congenital Malformations and its Correlation with Consanguineous Marriages.
Z Kanaan,R Mahfouz,H Tamim (2008). The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in an underserved area in Lebanon and its association with congenital anomalies.
Jai Das,Rehana Salam,Rohail Kumar,Zulfiqar Bhutta (2013). Micronutrient fortification of food and its impact on woman and child health: a systematic review.
Rabah Shawky,Doaa Sadik (2011). Congenital malformations prevalent among Egyptian children and associated risk factors.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Rubina Mukhtar. 2019. \u201cRole of Antenatal Screening for Congenital Anomalies by Grey Scale Ultrasound to Reduce the Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - D: Radiology, Diagnostic GJMR-D Volume 19 (GJMR Volume 19 Issue D1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 19 Issue D1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-D Classification NLMC Code: WF 141

Submission ReceivedDecember 16, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 26, 2019

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 111

Country: Pakistan

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - D: Radiology, Diagnostic

Authors: Dr. Rubina Mukhtar, Mukhtar Hussain, M. Ahmad Mukhtar, Isharat Sherood, Rubaida Mehmood, M. Saqib Khan (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 194

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2952

Total Downloads (simulated): 1391

Publish Date: 2019 03, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 28 views
Month 2: 34 views
Month 3: 57 views
Month 4: 31 views
Month 5: 57 views
Month 6: 53 views
Month 7: 56 views
Month 8: 19 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 28 views
Month 11: 29 views
Month 12: 38 views
Month 13: 16 views
Month 14: 30 views
Month 15: 36 views
Month 16: 22 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 21 views
Month 19: 28 views
Month 20: 29 views
Month 21: 45 views
Month 22: 18 views
Month 23: 23 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 36 views
Month 27: 35 views
Month 28: 24 views
Month 29: 32 views
Month 30: 40 views
Month 31: 34 views
Month 32: 37 views
Month 33: 29 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 42 views
Month 37: 37 views
Month 38: 26 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 28 views
Month 41: 25 views
Month 42: 43 views
Month 43: 40 views
Month 44: 40 views
Month 45: 13 views
Month 46: 18 views
Month 47: 40 views
Month 48: 29 views
Month 49: 43 views
Month 50: 21 views
Month 51: 44 views
Month 52: 24 views
Month 53: 25 views
Month 54: 24 views
Month 55: 38 views
Month 56: 16 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 19 views
Month 59: 34 views
Month 60: 29 views
Month 61: 13 views
Month 62: 31 views
Month 63: 27 views
Month 64: 41 views
Month 65: 10 views
Month 66: 27 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 40 views
Month 69: 32 views
Month 70: 35 views
Month 71: 17 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 28 views
Month 74: 19 views
Month 75: 17 views
Month 76: 25 views
Month 77: 31 views
Month 78: 33 views
Month 79: 24 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 39 views
Month 82: 22 views
Month 83: 91 views
Month 84: 84 views
Month 85: 86 views
Month 86: 48 views

Total Views: 2952

Total Downloads: 1391

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]