Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Between Local Tumor Recurrence and Benign Breast Changes after Breast Conservative Surgery

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Between Local Tumor Recurrence and Benign Breast Changes after Breast Conservative Surgery

Wael Abdulghaffar M

Contact

Magdy M. Tag-Aldein FRCS

Contact

Mansoura University

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Between Local Tumor Recurrence and Benign Breast Changes after Breast Conservative Surgery

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9934M

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

37 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Ismail Jatoi,Michael Proschan (2005). Randomized Trials of Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Primary Breast Cancer.
M Poggi,D Danforth,L Sciuto (2003). Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservaon therapy: the Naonal Cancer Instute randomized trial.
Todd Doyle,Delray Schultz,Christopher Peters,Eleanor Harris,Lawrence Solin (2001). Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer.
J Vandongen,A Voogd,I Fenman (2000). Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organizaon for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.
B Fowble,F Schwaibold (1991). Local-regional recurrence following definitive treatment for operable breast cancer.
L Preda,G Villa,S Rizzo (2006). Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
P Viehweg,A Heinig,D Lampe,J Buchmann,S Heywang-Köbrunner (1998). Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy.
Kathrin Frei,Karen Kinkel,Harald Bonel,Ying Lu,Laura Esserman,Nola Hylton (2000). MR Imaging of the Breast in Patients with Positive Margins After Lumpectomy.
Philip Drew,Michael Kerin,Lindsay Turnbull,Michael Imrie,Peter Carleton,John Fox,John Monson (1998). Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Linda Nunes,Mitchell Schnall,Susan Orel (2001). Update of Breast MR Imaging Architectural Interpretation Model.
M Schnall,J Blume,D Bluemke (2006). Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Alison Smith (2008). Magnetic resonance test and syllabus. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1991, $175; pp 658.
D Saslow,C Boetes,W Burke,S Harms,M Leach,C Lehman,E Morris,E Pisano,M Schnall,S Sener,R Smith,E Warner,M Yaffe,K Andrews,C Russell (2007). American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography.
M Schnall,J Blume,D Bluemke (2006). Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Karen Kinkel,Thomas Helbich,Laura Esserman,John Barclay,Ellen Schwerin,Edward Sickles,Nola Hylton (2000). Dynamic High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging of Suspicious Breast Lesions.
David Bluemke,C Gatsonis,M Chen (2004). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy.
Yong Guo,You‐quan Cai,Zu‐long Cai,Yuan‐gui Gao,Ning‐yu An,Lin Ma,Srikanth Mahankali,Jia‐hong Gao (2002). Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging.
Masamitsu Hatakenaka,Hiroyasu Soeda,Hidetake Yabuuchi,Yoshio Matsuo,Takeshi Kamitani,Yoshinao Oda,Masazumi Tsuneyoshi,Hiroshi Honda (2008). Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Breast Tumors: Clinical Application.
C Marini,C Iacconi,M Giannelli,A Cilotti,M Moretti,C Bartolozzi (2007). Quantitative diffusionweighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
Erika Rubesova,Anne‐sophie Grell,Viviane De Maertelaer,Thierry Metens,Shih‐li Chao,Marc Lemort (2006). Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: A clinical prospective study.
S Sinha,F Lucas-Quesada,U Sinha,N Debruhl,L Bassett (2002). In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.
Evelyn Wenkel,Christian Geppert,Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland,Michael Uder,Berthold Kiefer,Werner Bautz,Rolf Janka (2007). Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Breast MRI.
Reiko Woodhams,Keiji Matsunaga,Shinichi Kan,Hirofumi Hata,Masanori Ozaki,Keiichi Iwabuchi,Masaru Kuranami,Masahiko Watanabe,Kazushige Hayakawa (2005). ADC Mapping of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.
H Lyng,O Haraldseth,E Rofstad (2000). Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
H Yabuuchi,Y Matsuo,T Okafuji (2008). Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Susan Orel,Mitchell Schnall (2001). MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer.
Debra Ikeda,Douglas Baker,Bruce Daniel (2000). Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: Clinical indications and breast MRI reporting system.
Michael Jacobs,Peter Barker,David Bluemke,Cindy Maranto,Cheryl Arnold,Edward Herskovits,Zaver Bhujwalla (2003). Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Diagnosis with Multiparametric MR Imaging.
J Mi,Eun,Bong (2007). The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values for Breast Tumors.
M A Gonzales,Castañon A I,Baltar B N (2012). Diffusion weighted MR Imaging assessment after breast conservative treatment.
Cennet Sahin,Erkin Aribal (2013). The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI.
P Ranildi,M Giulaini,B Belli (2010). DWI in breast MRI: Role of ADC value to determine diagnosis of tumor between tumor recurrence and surgical scar in operated patients.
Y Tsushima (2009). Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5 T.
F Kelcz,K Hain (2010). Post Lumpectomy MRI: using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish benign from malignant tissues.
Gurpreet Dhillon,Nick Bell,Daniel Ginat,Alena Levit,Stamatia Destounis,Avice O’connell (2011). Breast MR Imaging: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
Jennifer Drukteinis,Eva Gombos,Sughra Raza,Sona Chikarmane,Arpita Swami,Robyn Birdwell (2012). MR Imaging Assessment of the Breast after Breast Conservation Therapy: Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Lesions.
Yoshifumi Kuroki,Katsuhiro Nasu,Seiko Kuroki,Koji Murakami,Takayuki Hayashi,Ryuzou Sekiguchi,Shigeru Nawano (2004). Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer with the Sensitivity Encoding Technique: Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Wael Abdulghaffar M. 2014. \u201cRole of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Between Local Tumor Recurrence and Benign Breast Changes after Breast Conservative Surgery\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - D: Radiology, Diagnostic GJMR-D Volume 14 (GJMR Volume 14 Issue D1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 14 Issue D1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient breast lesions diffusion-weighted imaging

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 21, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Egypt

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - D: Radiology, Diagnostic

Authors: Wael Abdulghaffar M, Magdy M. Tag-Aldein FRCS (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 136

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4642

Total Downloads (simulated): 2326

Publish Date: 2014 04, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 44 views
Month 2: 29 views
Month 3: 55 views
Month 4: 62 views
Month 5: 33 views
Month 6: 39 views
Month 7: 27 views
Month 8: 25 views
Month 9: 47 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 33 views
Month 12: 29 views
Month 13: 48 views
Month 14: 18 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 28 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 40 views
Month 19: 24 views
Month 20: 29 views
Month 21: 39 views
Month 22: 45 views
Month 23: 47 views
Month 24: 30 views
Month 25: 27 views
Month 26: 12 views
Month 27: 32 views
Month 28: 31 views
Month 29: 32 views
Month 30: 32 views
Month 31: 29 views
Month 32: 37 views
Month 33: 18 views
Month 34: 33 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 46 views
Month 37: 39 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 18 views
Month 40: 22 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 36 views
Month 43: 22 views
Month 44: 27 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 20 views
Month 47: 40 views
Month 48: 34 views
Month 49: 27 views
Month 50: 29 views
Month 51: 19 views
Month 52: 35 views
Month 53: 41 views
Month 54: 10 views
Month 55: 25 views
Month 56: 35 views
Month 57: 37 views
Month 58: 28 views
Month 59: 35 views
Month 60: 36 views
Month 61: 19 views
Month 62: 27 views
Month 63: 30 views
Month 64: 32 views
Month 65: 15 views
Month 66: 20 views
Month 67: 41 views
Month 68: 33 views
Month 69: 26 views
Month 70: 31 views
Month 71: 20 views
Month 72: 38 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 17 views
Month 75: 37 views
Month 76: 29 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 32 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 34 views
Month 81: 22 views
Month 82: 25 views
Month 83: 37 views
Month 84: 33 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 42 views
Month 87: 30 views
Month 88: 30 views
Month 89: 22 views
Month 90: 39 views
Month 91: 38 views
Month 92: 35 views
Month 93: 41 views
Month 94: 36 views
Month 95: 14 views
Month 96: 41 views
Month 97: 29 views
Month 98: 25 views
Month 99: 43 views
Month 100: 33 views
Month 101: 32 views
Month 102: 16 views
Month 103: 27 views
Month 104: 44 views
Month 105: 31 views
Month 106: 29 views
Month 107: 18 views
Month 108: 21 views
Month 109: 14 views
Month 110: 37 views
Month 111: 23 views
Month 112: 34 views
Month 113: 12 views
Month 114: 25 views
Month 115: 24 views
Month 116: 18 views
Month 117: 32 views
Month 118: 15 views
Month 119: 45 views
Month 120: 35 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 27 views
Month 123: 21 views
Month 124: 44 views
Month 125: 23 views
Month 126: 12 views
Month 127: 34 views
Month 128: 23 views
Month 129: 35 views
Month 130: 29 views
Month 131: 36 views
Month 132: 37 views
Month 133: 42 views
Month 134: 36 views
Month 135: 21 views
Month 136: 44 views
Month 137: 36 views
Month 138: 26 views
Month 139: 32 views
Month 140: 17 views
Month 141: 21 views
Month 142: 24 views
Month 143: 61 views
Month 144: 60 views
Month 145: 52 views
Month 146: 40 views

Total Views: 4642

Total Downloads: 2326

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]