Selfvariations vs Standard Cosmological Model Using as Criterion the Cosmological Data

Selfvariations vs Standard Cosmological Model Using as Criterion the Cosmological Data

Emmanuil Manousos

Contact

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Selfvariations vs Standard Cosmological Model Using as Criterion the Cosmological Data

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFRQ604Z

Selfvariations vs Standard Cosmological Model Using as Criterion the Cosmological Data Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

We compare the Standard Cosmological Model with the Model of the Selfvariations, based upon the cosmological data as we collect them since the time of Hubble. We selected to examine the 14 most fundamental pieces of data. The Standard Cosmological Model can justify four of these, it can justify two additional with some further assumptions, while it cannot justify the remaining eight. The Cosmological Model of the Selfvariations justifies eleven, while the completeness of justification of the remaining two is a matter of further investigation. We did not identify any piece of cosmological data that contradicts the predictions of the Model of the Selfvariations.

References

31 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Edwin Hubble (1929). A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae.
E Hubble,M Humason (1931). The velocity-distance relation among extra-galactic nebulae.
A Sandage (1989). Edwin Hubble 1889-1953.
T Chow (2008). Introduction to Cosmology.
E Manousos (2013). Cosmological data could have a microscopic, not macroscopic, cause.
E Manousos (2013). ON THE ABSENCE OF ANTIMATTER FROM THE UNIVERSE, DARK MATTER, THE FINE STRUCTURE PARAMETER, THE FLUCTUATIONS OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION AND THE TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE OF THE UNIVERSE.
A Penzias,R Wilson (1965). A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s..
Adam Riess,Alexei Filippenko,Peter Challis,Alejandro Clocchiatti,Alan Diercks,Peter Garnavich,Ron Gilliland,Craig Hogan,Saurabh Jha,Robert Kirshner,B Leibundgut,M Phillips,David Reiss,Brian Schmidt,Robert Schommer,R Smith,J Spyromilio,Christopher Stubbs,Nicholas Suntzeff,John Tonry (1998). Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant.
S Perlmutter,M Turner,M White (1999). Constraining dark energy with type Ia supernovae and Large-Scale structure.
H Bond,E Nelan,D Vandenberg,G Schaefer,D Harmer (2013). HD 140283: A Star in the solar neighborhood that formed shortly after the big bang.
R Alpher,H Bethe,G Gamow (1948). The origin of chemical elements.
J Gott (2005). A Map of the Universe.
H Chand,R Srianand,P Petitjean,B Aracil (2004). Probing the cosmological variation of the fine-structure constant: Results based on VLT-UVES sample.
J De Laeter,K Rosman,C Smith (1980). The Oklo Natural Reactor: Cumulative Fission Yields and Retentivity of the Symmetric Mass Region Fission Products.
V Dzuba,V Flambaum,J Webb (1999). Space-Time Variation of Physical Constants and Relativistic Corrections in Atoms.
F Gauthier-Lafaye (2002). 2 billion year old natural analogs for nuclear waste disposal: the natural nuclear fission reactors in Gabon (Africa).
Julian King,Michael Murphy,Wim Ubachs,John Webb (2011). New constraint on cosmological variation of the proton-to-electron mass ratio from Q0528−250.
A Meshik,C Hohenberg,O Pravdivtseva (2004). Record of Cycling Operation of the Natural Nuclear Reactor in the Oklo/Okelobondo Area in Gabon.
P Molaro,S Levshakov,S Monai,M Centurión,P Bonifacio,S D'odorico,L Monaco (2008). UVES radial velocity accuracy from asteroid observations.
M Murphy,J Webb,V Flambaum (2008). Revision of VLT/UVES constraints on a varying fine-structure constant.
M Murphy,P Tzanavaris,J Webb,C Lovis (2007). Selection of ThAr lines for wavelength calibration of echelle spectra and implications for variations in the fine-structure constant.
M Murphy,J Webb,V Flambaum (2003). Further evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra.
V Yu,A Petrov,M Nazarov,E Onegin,Sakhnovsky (2006). Natural nuclear reactor at Oklo and variation of fundamental constants: Computation of neutronics of a fresh core.
P Tzanavaris,J Webb,M Murphy,V Flambaum,S Curran (2005). Limits on Variations in Fundamental Constants from 21-cm and Ultraviolet Quasar Absorption Lines.
J Webb (2011). Indications of a Spatial Variation of the Fine Structure Constant.
J Webb,M Murphy,V Flambaum,V Dzuba,J Barrow,C Churchill,J Prochaska,A Wolfe (2001). Further Evidence for Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant.
J Webb,V Flambaum,C Churchill,M Drinkwater,J Barrow (1999). Search for time variation of the fine structure constant.
G Hinshaw (2009). Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results.
Roger Clowes,Kathryn Harris,Srinivasan Raghunathan,Luis Campusano,Ilona Söchting,Matthew Graham (2013). A structure in the early Universe at z ∼ 1.3 that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-W concordance cosmology.
Matthew Walker,Mario Mateo,Edward Olszewski,Jorge Peñarrubia,N Evans,Gerard Gilmore (2009). A UNIVERSAL MASS PROFILE FOR DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES?.
A Riess Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Emmanuil Manousos. 2014. \u201cSelfvariations vs Standard Cosmological Model Using as Criterion the Cosmological Data\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue A2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 14 Issue A2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

cosmological model SCM selfvariations

Submission ReceivedApril 15, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 7, 2014
Published May 22, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 6, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Greece

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science

Authors: Emmanuil Manousos (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 127

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4549

Total Downloads (simulated): 2303

Publish Date: 2014 07, Sun

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 33 views
Month 2: 26 views
Month 3: 57 views
Month 4: 48 views
Month 5: 41 views
Month 6: 49 views
Month 7: 44 views
Month 8: 30 views
Month 9: 52 views
Month 10: 44 views
Month 11: 30 views
Month 12: 23 views
Month 13: 45 views
Month 14: 38 views
Month 15: 34 views
Month 16: 35 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 12 views
Month 19: 28 views
Month 20: 27 views
Month 21: 19 views
Month 22: 21 views
Month 23: 41 views
Month 24: 19 views
Month 25: 29 views
Month 26: 28 views
Month 27: 20 views
Month 28: 35 views
Month 29: 32 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 34 views
Month 32: 25 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 34 views
Month 35: 27 views
Month 36: 30 views
Month 37: 48 views
Month 38: 15 views
Month 39: 34 views
Month 40: 17 views
Month 41: 24 views
Month 42: 34 views
Month 43: 25 views
Month 44: 41 views
Month 45: 27 views
Month 46: 17 views
Month 47: 24 views
Month 48: 40 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 28 views
Month 52: 21 views
Month 53: 28 views
Month 54: 37 views
Month 55: 26 views
Month 56: 19 views
Month 57: 40 views
Month 58: 27 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 31 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 38 views
Month 63: 36 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 42 views
Month 66: 39 views
Month 67: 24 views
Month 68: 39 views
Month 69: 27 views
Month 70: 44 views
Month 71: 28 views
Month 72: 37 views
Month 73: 35 views
Month 74: 42 views
Month 75: 18 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 27 views
Month 78: 31 views
Month 79: 17 views
Month 80: 39 views
Month 81: 23 views
Month 82: 23 views
Month 83: 16 views
Month 84: 29 views
Month 85: 33 views
Month 86: 14 views
Month 87: 15 views
Month 88: 21 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 24 views
Month 91: 35 views
Month 92: 28 views
Month 93: 36 views
Month 94: 34 views
Month 95: 20 views
Month 96: 15 views
Month 97: 24 views
Month 98: 43 views
Month 99: 39 views
Month 100: 33 views
Month 101: 40 views
Month 102: 38 views
Month 103: 34 views
Month 104: 26 views
Month 105: 31 views
Month 106: 18 views
Month 107: 22 views
Month 108: 22 views
Month 109: 34 views
Month 110: 46 views
Month 111: 17 views
Month 112: 25 views
Month 113: 20 views
Month 114: 47 views
Month 115: 23 views
Month 116: 28 views
Month 117: 31 views
Month 118: 41 views
Month 119: 24 views
Month 120: 40 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 26 views
Month 123: 38 views
Month 124: 47 views
Month 125: 28 views
Month 126: 41 views
Month 127: 31 views
Month 128: 29 views
Month 129: 38 views
Month 130: 41 views
Month 131: 35 views
Month 132: 37 views
Month 133: 34 views
Month 134: 32 views
Month 135: 25 views
Month 136: 32 views
Month 137: 26 views
Month 138: 30 views
Month 139: 43 views
Month 140: 45 views
Month 141: 45 views
Month 142: 52 views
Month 143: 27 views

Total Views: 4549

Total Downloads: 2303

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]