Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach

1
Gaurav Kulkarni
Gaurav Kulkarni
1 Institute of Technology and Management Universe Vadodara

Send Message

To: Author

GJCST Volume 17 Issue C3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDEZ2JT1

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has received a great deal of attention from both academia and industry in recent years. Studies on SDN have brought a number of interesting technical discussions on network architecture design, along with scientific contributions. Researchers, network operators, and vendors are trying to establish new standards and provide guidelines for proper implementation and deployment of such novel approach. It is clear that many of these research efforts have been made in the southbound of the SDN architecture, while the northbound interface still needs improvements. By focusing in the SDN northbound, this paper surveys the body of knowledge and discusses the challenges for developing SDN software. We investigate the existing solutions and identify trends and challenges on programming for SDN environments.

18 Cites in Articles

References

  1. R Gronback (2009). Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit.
  2. T Özgür (2007). Comparison of Microsoft DSL Tools and Eclipse Modeling Frameworks for Domain-Specific Modeling In the context of the Model Driven Development.
  3. Timothy Hinrichs,Natasha Gude,Martin Casado,John Mitchell,Scott Shenker (2009). Practical declarative network management.
  4. A Voellmy,A Agarwal,P Hudak (2011). Nettle: Functional Reactive Programming for OpenFlow Networks.
  5. Christopher Monsanto,Nate Foster,Rob Harrison,David Walker (2012). A compiler and run-time system for network programming languages.
  6. A Monsanto,J Reich,N Foster,J Rexford,D Walker (2013). Composing Software-Defined Networks.
  7. N Katta,J Rexford,D Walker (2012). Logic Programming for Software-Defined Networks.
  8. T Koponen,K Amidon,P Balland,M Casado,A Chanda,B Fulton,I Ganichev,J Gross,P Ingram,E Jackson (2014). Network virtualization in multi-tenant datacenters.
  9. T Nelson,A Ferguson,M Scheer,S Krishnamurthi (2014). Tierless Programming and Reasoning for Software-Defined Networks.
  10. N Foster,A Guha,M Reitblatt,A Story,M Freedman,N Katta,C Monsanto,J Reich,J Rexford,C Schlesinger,D Walker,R Harrison (2013). Languages for software-defined networks.
  11. T Koponen,M Casado,N Gude,J Stribling,L Poutievski,M Zhu,R Ramanathan,Y Iwata,H Inoue,T Hama,S Shenker (2010). Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks.
  12. Mark Strembeck,Uwe Zdun (2009). An approach for the systematic development of domain‐specific languages.
  13. Andreas Voellmy,Hyojoon Kim,Nick Feamster (2012). Procera.
  14. D Schmidt (2006). Guest Editor's Introduction: Model-Driven Engineering.
  15. A Van Deursen,P Klint,J Visser (2000). Domain-Specific Languages: An Annotated Bibliography.
  16. F Case (1985). Computer-aided software engineering (CASE).
  17. D Frankel (2002). Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology.
  18. T Stahl,M Voelter,K Czarnecki (2006). Model-Driven Software Development.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Gaurav Kulkarni. 2018. \u201cSimplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 17 (GJCST Volume 17 Issue C3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 17 Issue C3
Pg. 25- 29
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification: C.2.5, C.2.6
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 12, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 6148
Total Downloads: 1636
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has received a great deal of attention from both academia and industry in recent years. Studies on SDN have brought a number of interesting technical discussions on network architecture design, along with scientific contributions. Researchers, network operators, and vendors are trying to establish new standards and provide guidelines for proper implementation and deployment of such novel approach. It is clear that many of these research efforts have been made in the southbound of the SDN architecture, while the northbound interface still needs improvements. By focusing in the SDN northbound, this paper surveys the body of knowledge and discusses the challenges for developing SDN software. We investigate the existing solutions and identify trends and challenges on programming for SDN environments.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach

Gaurav Kulkarni
Gaurav Kulkarni Rajiv Gandhi Prodhyogiki Viswavidhyalaya

Research Journals