Loading menu…

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach

§ Institute of Technology and Management Universe Vado...

Send Message

To: Author

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDEZ2JT1

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has received a great deal of attention from both academia and industry in recent years. Studies on SDN have brought a number of interesting technical discussions on network architecture design, along with scientific contributions. Researchers, network operators, and vendors are trying to establish new standards and provide guidelines for proper implementation and deployment of such novel approach. It is clear that many of these research efforts have been made in the southbound of the SDN architecture, while the northbound interface still needs improvements. By focusing in the SDN northbound, this paper surveys the body of knowledge and discusses the challenges for developing SDN software. We investigate the existing solutions and identify trends and challenges on programming for SDN environments.

References

18 Cites in Article
  1. 1. R Gronback (2009). Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit. Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit
  2. 2. T Özgür (2007). Comparison of Microsoft DSL Tools and Eclipse Modeling Frameworks for Domain-Specific Modeling In the context of the Model Driven Development. Comparison of Microsoft DSL Tools and Eclipse Modeling Frameworks for Domain-Specific Modeling In the context of the Model Driven Development, 56.
  3. 3. Timothy Hinrichs,Natasha Gude,Martin Casado,John Mitchell,Scott Shenker (2009). Practical declarative network management. Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Research on enterprise networking, 1-10.
  4. 4. A Voellmy,A Agarwal,P Hudak (2011). Nettle: Functional Reactive Programming for OpenFlow Networks. Nettle: Functional Reactive Programming for OpenFlow Networks
  5. 5. Christopher Monsanto,Nate Foster,Rob Harrison,David Walker (2012). A compiler and run-time system for network programming languages. Proceedings of the 39th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, 217-230.
  6. 6. A Monsanto,J Reich,N Foster,J Rexford,D Walker (2013). Composing Software-Defined Networks. Composing Software-Defined Networks
  7. 7. N Katta,J Rexford,D Walker (2012). Logic Programming for Software-Defined Networks. ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Cross-Model Language Design and Implementation
  8. 8. T Koponen,K Amidon,P Balland,M Casado,A Chanda,B Fulton,I Ganichev,J Gross,P Ingram,E Jackson (2014). Network virtualization in multi-tenant datacenters. 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 14), 203-216.
  9. 9. T Nelson,A Ferguson,M Scheer,S Krishnamurthi (2014). Tierless Programming and Reasoning for Software-Defined Networks. Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2-4.
  10. 10. N Foster,A Guha,M Reitblatt,A Story,M Freedman,N Katta,C Monsanto,J Reich,J Rexford,C Schlesinger,D Walker,R Harrison (2013). Languages for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(2), 128-134.
  11. 11. T Koponen,M Casado,N Gude,J Stribling,L Poutievski,M Zhu,R Ramanathan,Y Iwata,H Inoue,T Hama,S Shenker (2010). Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks. USENIX OSDI, 351-364.
  12. 12. Mark Strembeck,Uwe Zdun (2009). An approach for the systematic development of domain‐specific languages. Software: Practice and Experience, 39(15), 1253-1292.
  13. 13. Andreas Voellmy,Hyojoon Kim,Nick Feamster (2012). Procera. Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks, 43-48.
  14. 14. D Schmidt (2006). Guest Editor's Introduction: Model-Driven Engineering. Computer, 39(2), 25-31.
  15. 15. A Van Deursen,P Klint,J Visser (2000). Domain-Specific Languages: An Annotated Bibliography. Sigplan Notices, 35(6), 26-36.
  16. 16. F Case (1985). Computer-aided software engineering (CASE). ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 17(1), 35-43.
  17. 17. D Frankel (2002). Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology. Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology
  18. 18. T Stahl,M Voelter,K Czarnecki (2006). Model-Driven Software Development. Model-Driven Software Development

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Gaurav Kulkarni. 2018. "Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 17 (GJCST Volume 17 Issue C3).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification C.2.5
C.2.6
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
January 12, 2018

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2.6K
Total Downloads: 191
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Simplification of Internet Ossification through Software Defined Network Approach

Gaurav Kulkarni
Gaurav Kulkarni Institute of Technology and Management Universe Vadodara