Social and Psychological Underpinning of the Bar-Tal and Antebi’s Concept of General Siege Mentality within Different Ethnic Groups

Article ID

41C11

Social and Psychological Underpinning of the Bar-Tal and Antebi’s Concept of General Siege Mentality within Different Ethnic Groups

Zlatko Sram
Zlatko Sram University of the Sacred Heart
Jasminka Dulic
Jasminka Dulic
DOI

Abstract

The aim of this research was to find out (1) whether social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and primary psychopathy are significant predictors of Daniel Bar-Tal & Dikla Antebi’s concept of general siege mentality (GSM), and (2) whether the components of the path model are invariant across different ethnic groups. The survey was carried out on the adult population in the region of eastern Croatia where live Croats and Serbian ethnic minority, and in the northern region of Serbia where live the members of Croatian ethnic minority (The Province of Vojvodina). The convenience and purposive sample consisted of 1431 full aged participants. Multiple-group analysis of structural invariance was used to test whether differences observed in the structural parameters across different ethnic groups are statistically significant. All path estimates were significant, in the expected direction and indicated much similarity in structural relationships across different ethnic groups. It might be concluded that social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism, and primary psychopathy had expressed the causal effects on emerging general siege mentality across different ethnic groups. The structural paths for different ethnic groups can be considered identical if Chi-square does not reveal a statistically significant difference between unconstrained and constrained models. It was found out that difference in path estimates for different ethnic groups had not been significant, which means that constrained multiple group model was accepted. Results showed that ethnic belongings did not significantly moderate relations between variables. About 36% of the variance of general siege mentality was explained by social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism, and primary psychopathy for the full sample in the accepted constrained model. There is an evidence that a more complex and severe political-psychological disorder is underpinning the Bar-Tal & Antebi’s concept of general siege

Social and Psychological Underpinning of the Bar-Tal and Antebi’s Concept of General Siege Mentality within Different Ethnic Groups

The aim of this research was to find out (1) whether social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and primary psychopathy are significant predictors of Daniel Bar-Tal & Dikla Antebi’s concept of general siege mentality (GSM), and (2) whether the components of the path model are invariant across different ethnic groups. The survey was carried out on the adult population in the region of eastern Croatia where live Croats and Serbian ethnic minority, and in the northern region of Serbia where live the members of Croatian ethnic minority (The Province of Vojvodina). The convenience and purposive sample consisted of 1431 full aged participants. Multiple-group analysis of structural invariance was used to test whether differences observed in the structural parameters across different ethnic groups are statistically significant. All path estimates were significant, in the expected direction and indicated much similarity in structural relationships across different ethnic groups. It might be concluded that social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism, and primary psychopathy had expressed the causal effects on emerging general siege mentality across different ethnic groups. The structural paths for different ethnic groups can be considered identical if Chi-square does not reveal a statistically significant difference between unconstrained and constrained models. It was found out that difference in path estimates for different ethnic groups had not been significant, which means that constrained multiple group model was accepted. Results showed that ethnic belongings did not significantly moderate relations between variables. About 36% of the variance of general siege mentality was explained by social alienation, right-wing authoritarianism, and primary psychopathy for the full sample in the accepted constrained model. There is an evidence that a more complex and severe political-psychological disorder is underpinning the Bar-Tal & Antebi’s concept of general siege

Zlatko Sram
Zlatko Sram University of the Sacred Heart
Jasminka Dulic
Jasminka Dulic

No Figures found in article.

Zlatko Sram. 2018. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 18 (GJHSS Volume 18 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Classification
GJHSS-C Classification: FOR Code: 170199
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3243
Total Downloads: 1571
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Social and Psychological Underpinning of the Bar-Tal and Antebi’s Concept of General Siege Mentality within Different Ethnic Groups

Zlatko Sram
Zlatko Sram University of the Sacred Heart
Jasminka Dulic
Jasminka Dulic

Research Journals