Socioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections

α
Kostas Rontos
Kostas Rontos
σ
Ioannis Vavouras
Ioannis Vavouras
α University of the Aegean University of the Aegean

Send Message

To: Author

Socioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

A03D9

Socioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The scope of the paper is to investigate the basic factors of development worldwide. By following factor analysis, six variables that we consider of high importance for the overall development of nations, namely the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness, the level of perceived corruption, the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties are found to be integrated into two basic factors of development: the socioeconomic factor and the political factor. The socioeconomic factor comprises the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness and the level of perceived corruption, while the political factor comprises the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties. Our analysis unveils that both these factors are of crucial importance for the overall development of countries. Based on these two factors or criteria of development, our empirical work in the form of cluster analysis distinguishes four groups of countries that we describe and discuss in length. The basic conclusion that emerges from our cluster analysis is that although an effective strategy towards overall development demands integrated policies that incorporate both the socioeconomic and the political dimensions of development, most countries worldwide have not achieve both of them.

References

37 Cites in Article
  1. A Alesina,S Özler,N Roubini,P Swayel (1992). Political instability and economic growth.
  2. Albert De Vaal,Wouter Ebben (2011). Institutions and the Relation between Corruption and Economic Growth.
  3. (2010). about freedom house.
  4. (2013). Freedom in the world 2013.
  5. S Huntington (1968). Political order in changing societies.
  6. M Johnston (2001). The definitions debate: Old conflicts in new guises.
  7. D Kaufmann,A Kraay,M Mastruzzi (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues.
  8. Daniel Kaufmann,Aart Kraay,Massimo Mastruzzi (2009). Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008.
  9. Dionisios Lalountas,George Manolas,Ioannis Vavouras (2011). Corruption, globalization and development: How are these three phenomena related?.
  10. J Lambsdorff (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform.
  11. J Lambsdorff (2006). Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries.
  12. Daniel Lederman,Norman Loayza,Rodrigo Soares (2005). ACCOUNTABILITY AND CORRUPTION: POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS MATTER.
  13. Nathaniel Leff (1964). Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption.
  14. J Martinez-Vazquez,J Arze Del Granado,J Boex (2007). Fighting corruption in the public sector.
  15. Martin Needler (1968). Political Development and Socioeconomic Development: The Case of Latin America.
  16. (1996). Public Service Pay Determination and Pay Systems in OECD Countries.
  17. M Paldam (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption. Economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics.
  18. M Paldam (1998). Does economic growth lead to political stability.
  19. J Roemer (1994). On the relationship between economic and political democracy.
  20. Kostas Rontos,Luca Salvati,Petros Sioussiouras,Ioannis Vavouras (2013). Mediterranean Countries and Corruption: Political, Economic, and Social Factors.
  21. K Rontos,L Salvati,I Vavouras (2013). Socioeconomic and political dimensions of development worldwide.
  22. Susan Rose-Ackerman (1999). Corruption and Government.
  23. Vito Tanzi (1998). Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures.
  24. (2011). Frequently asked questions about corruption.
  25. (2010). Figure 2.7. Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index.
  26. Lucy Koechlin (2008). Working Paper 5: Poverty and corruption.
  27. D Treisman (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study.
  28. (2002). Arab human development report.
  29. (2008). Evaluation of UNDP Contribution to Anti-Corruption and Addressing Drivers of Corruption.
  30. (2009). Statistical annexes.
  31. (2010). Human Development Report 2010.
  32. M Warren (2004). What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?.
  33. (2010). Africa Development Indicators 2006.
  34. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators, 2009 update. Aggregate indicators of governance 1996-2009.
  35. (1997). World Development Report 1997.
  36. D Washington (2001). Washington, University of.
  37. Yan Zhang,Liqun Cao,Michael Vaughn (2009). Social Support and Corruption: Structural Determinants of Corruption in the World.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kostas Rontos. 2013. \u201cSocioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F5): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F5
Pg. 51- 65
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 18, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4810
Total Downloads: 2414
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The scope of the paper is to investigate the basic factors of development worldwide. By following factor analysis, six variables that we consider of high importance for the overall development of nations, namely the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness, the level of perceived corruption, the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties are found to be integrated into two basic factors of development: the socioeconomic factor and the political factor. The socioeconomic factor comprises the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness and the level of perceived corruption, while the political factor comprises the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties. Our analysis unveils that both these factors are of crucial importance for the overall development of countries. Based on these two factors or criteria of development, our empirical work in the form of cluster analysis distinguishes four groups of countries that we describe and discuss in length. The basic conclusion that emerges from our cluster analysis is that although an effective strategy towards overall development demands integrated policies that incorporate both the socioeconomic and the political dimensions of development, most countries worldwide have not achieve both of them.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Socioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections

Kostas Rontos
Kostas Rontos University of the Aegean
Ioannis Vavouras
Ioannis Vavouras

Research Journals