Some Geotechnical Properties of Coal Fly Ash and Sand Mixtures with Different Ratio Using in Highway & Embankments

Some Geotechnical Properties of Coal Fly Ash and Sand Mixtures with Different Ratio Using in Highway & Embankments

Dilip Kumar

Contact

Ashish Gupta

Contact

Neetesh Kumar

Contact

α Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology

Some Geotechnical Properties of Coal Fly Ash and Sand Mixtures with Different Ratio Using in Highway & Embankments

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

I559M

Some Geotechnical Properties of Coal Fly Ash and Sand Mixtures with Different Ratio Using in Highway & Embankments Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Fly ash is very effectively used in various civil engineering projects. Fly ash is a by-product of coal burning thermal power plants plant. The quantity of coal ash produced depends upon the quality of coal and the method of burning of the coal. In India less than 20% of ash is used in the manufacture of brick, cement, concrete and other product. Sand particles are much coarser than the fly ash. Here we are using different proportion as 100%S, 80%S+20%FA, 60%S+40%FA, 40%S+60%FA, 20%S+80%FA, 100% FA. Different test like Grain size analysis Specific gravity, Standard proctor test, Permeability test, direct shear test, California Bearing Ratio test were done on different proportions. MDD increases while dry density decreases as Sand increases. Permeability decreases as fly ash content increases. CBR value decreases for both soaked and unsoaked condition as fly ash content increases.

References

31 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Dilip Kumar,Neetesh Kumar,Ashish Gupta (2014). Geotechnical Properties of Fly Ash and Bottom Ash Mixtures in Different Proportions.
R Kalyoncu (2005). Coal Combustion Products Production and Uses.
Mahipal Chauhan,Satyendra Mittal,Bijayananda Mohanty (2008). Performance evaluation of silty sand subgrade reinforced with fly ash and fibre.
Erdal Cokca (2001). Use Of Class C Fly Ashes for the Stabilization -of an Expansive Soil.
B Kim,M Prezzi,R Salgado (2005). Geotechnical Properties of Fly and Sand Mixtures for Use in Highway EmSnkments.
H Acosta,T Edil,C Benson (2005). Soil Stabilization And Drying Using Fly Ash.
B Phani,R S Sharma (2004). Effect of Fly Ash on Engg. Property of Expansive Soil.
J Prashanth (1998). Chapter 1 The production and properties of fly ash.
M Usmen (1977). A critical review of the applicability of conventional test methods and materials specifications to the use of coal associated waste in pavement construction.
N Pandian,K Krishna,B Leelavathamma (2002). Effect of Fly Ash on the CBR Behaviour of Soils.
Shailesh Gandhi,Ashim Dey,S Selvam (1999). Densification of Pond Ash by Blasting.
N Bhatta (2008). Engineering properties of pond ash and pond ash sand mixtures.
Nilo Consoli,Pedro Prietto,João Carraro,Karla Heineck (2001). Behavior of Compacted Soil-Fly Ash-Carbide Lime Mixtures.
W Docky,D Manigault (1947). Lime Stabilization and Low Cost Road Construction.
Joseph Martin,Robert Collins,John Browning,Francis Biehl (1990). Properties and Use of Fly Ashes for Embankments.
S Kaniraj,V Havangi (1999). Geotechnical Characteristics of Fly Ash Soil Mixture.
Virendra Singh,Narendra Kumar,Devendra Mohan (1996). Use of Fly Ash in Soil Stabilization for Road.
Manjit Singh,Mridul Garg (1999). Cementitious binder from fly ash and other industrial wastes.
W Selvig,F Gibson (1956). Analysis of ash from United States coals.
D Prasad (2011). A study on flexible pavement performance with reinforced fly-ash sub base.
Roger Seals,Lyle Moulton,Byron Ruth (1972). Bottom Ash: An Engineering Material.
H Huang (1990). The use of Sand in highway emSnkments sub grade, and sub Sse.
S Mathur,U Vittal,V Havangi,A Sinha (2003). Design and construction of reinforced approach embankment using pond ash.
Alan Lutenegger (2022). Density (Unit Weight) of Solids (Specific Gravity).
(null). Test Methods for Determination of Maximum Dry Unit Weight and Water Content Range for Effective Compaction of Granular Soils Using a Vibrating Hammer.
(null). Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head).
Direct Shear Test for Soils containing gravel.
N Sridharan,C Pandian,Rajasekhar (1996). Geotechnical characterization of pond ash, Ash Ponds and Ash Disposal systems.
Virendra Singh,Narendra Kumar,Devendra Mohan (1996). Practice for Characterizing Fly Ash for Use in Soil Stabilization.
Phani Kumar,S Sharma,R (2004). Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils.
Abdul Rahim,Awang,Aminaton Marto,Ahmad Mahir Makhtar (2011). Geotechnical Properties of Tanjung Bin Coal Ash Mixtures for Backfill Materials.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dilip Kumar. 2014. \u201cSome Geotechnical Properties of Coal Fly Ash and Sand Mixtures with Different Ratio Using in Highway & Embankments\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue E5): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 14 Issue E5
Pg. 35- 40

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

CBR value coal fly ash permeability sand shear strength

Submission ReceivedDecember 8, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 5, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: Dilip Kumar, Ashish Gupta,Neetesh Kumar (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 164

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4406

Total Downloads (simulated): 2219

Publish Date: 2014 11, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 56 views
Month 2: 26 views
Month 3: 32 views
Month 4: 42 views
Month 5: 20 views
Month 6: 32 views
Month 7: 47 views
Month 8: 36 views
Month 9: 45 views
Month 10: 33 views
Month 11: 46 views
Month 12: 27 views
Month 13: 31 views
Month 14: 26 views
Month 15: 27 views
Month 16: 25 views
Month 17: 35 views
Month 18: 21 views
Month 19: 31 views
Month 20: 44 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 31 views
Month 23: 36 views
Month 24: 24 views
Month 25: 25 views
Month 26: 30 views
Month 27: 17 views
Month 28: 22 views
Month 29: 33 views
Month 30: 28 views
Month 31: 24 views
Month 32: 25 views
Month 33: 38 views
Month 34: 26 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 21 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 39 views
Month 40: 39 views
Month 41: 18 views
Month 42: 26 views
Month 43: 25 views
Month 44: 35 views
Month 45: 33 views
Month 46: 30 views
Month 47: 42 views
Month 48: 34 views
Month 49: 16 views
Month 50: 39 views
Month 51: 21 views
Month 52: 34 views
Month 53: 32 views
Month 54: 32 views
Month 55: 28 views
Month 56: 36 views
Month 57: 33 views
Month 58: 20 views
Month 59: 45 views
Month 60: 43 views
Month 61: 30 views
Month 62: 30 views
Month 63: 18 views
Month 64: 17 views
Month 65: 23 views
Month 66: 19 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 22 views
Month 69: 33 views
Month 70: 14 views
Month 71: 36 views
Month 72: 44 views
Month 73: 34 views
Month 74: 19 views
Month 75: 41 views
Month 76: 26 views
Month 77: 37 views
Month 78: 24 views
Month 79: 39 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 38 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 45 views
Month 84: 27 views
Month 85: 27 views
Month 86: 32 views
Month 87: 22 views
Month 88: 47 views
Month 89: 40 views
Month 90: 20 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 18 views
Month 93: 11 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 30 views
Month 96: 43 views
Month 97: 27 views
Month 98: 31 views
Month 99: 18 views
Month 100: 24 views
Month 101: 16 views
Month 102: 32 views
Month 103: 46 views
Month 104: 33 views
Month 105: 24 views
Month 106: 19 views
Month 107: 40 views
Month 108: 21 views
Month 109: 38 views
Month 110: 30 views
Month 111: 34 views
Month 112: 33 views
Month 113: 17 views
Month 114: 29 views
Month 115: 24 views
Month 116: 38 views
Month 117: 29 views
Month 118: 30 views
Month 119: 28 views
Month 120: 37 views
Month 121: 25 views
Month 122: 35 views
Month 123: 31 views
Month 124: 38 views
Month 125: 35 views
Month 126: 38 views
Month 127: 26 views
Month 128: 34 views
Month 129: 26 views
Month 130: 43 views
Month 131: 35 views
Month 132: 12 views
Month 133: 21 views
Month 134: 49 views
Month 135: 34 views
Month 136: 49 views
Month 137: 59 views
Month 138: 36 views

Total Views: 4406

Total Downloads: 2219

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]