Sound Apperception Test: Development and Validation

Sound Apperception Test: Development and Validation

Y. K. Nagle

Contact

E. Kalpna Rani

Contact

1 Defence Institute of Psychological Research

GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A8

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

IEPY7

Sound Apperception Test: Development and Validation Banner

We report the development of Sound Apperception Test (SAT) measuring personality using an alternative, auditory form of projective testing. Sound effects designed to measure four personality dimensions, viz. intellectual functioning; interpersonal adjustment, task orientation and emotional embedded-ness were created. Stimulus analysis was carried out on a randomly drawn sample (n=440). Twenty-four out of the 60 sound effects had more than 75% consensus among expert raters and were retained. Six of the 18 sound effects were common for males and females, and six each were gender-specific. The test-retest reliability for males (n=107) was 0.692-0.765 (p< 0.01) and for females (n=69) it was 0.644-0.841 (p< 0.01). The validity for males (n=178) was 0.652-0.691 (p

25 Cites in Articles

References

I Abramson (1963). A Comparison of an Auditory and a Visual Projective Technique.
H Alexander (1952). Auditory apperception: A projective approach to personality dynamic through sound stimuli.
Kenneth Bean (1965). Scoring and Interpreting Responses to Semi-Structured Sound Effects.
K Bean (1965). The Sound Apperception Test: Origin, purpose, standardization, scoring and use.
L Bellak (1973). Supervue of New York City.
L Bender (1938). A visual motor gestalt and its clinical use.
S Braverman,H Cheviguy (1952). The Auditory Projective Test.
Ilana Breger (1969). Some Structural Variables in Auditory Projective Testing.
I Breger (1970). Initial note on content in auditory projective testing.
L Frank (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality.
F Goodenough (1926). Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings.
D Harris (1963). Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity.
G Jung (1910). The Association Method.
Dell Lebo,Roselyn Bruce (1960). Projective Methods Recommended for Use with the Blind.
D Mcclelland (1985). How motives, skills and values determine what people do.
D Mcclelland,V Patel,Stier,D Brown (1987). The relationship of affinitive to dopamine relives.
David Mcclelland,Richard Koestner,Joel Weinberger (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?.
H Murray (1936). Techniques for a Systematic Investigation of Fantasy.
H Murray (1938). Exploration in Personality.
H Murray (1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual.
H Rorschach (1951). Psychodiagnostics; A Diagnostic Test Base on Perception.
P Lemkau,B Kronenberg (1977). Psychiatric Aspects of Neurologic Disease. Edited by D. F. Benson and D. Blumer. (Pp. 312; illustrated; £9.60.) Grune & Stratton: New York. 1975. - Topics in Psychoendocrinology. Edited by E. J. Sachar. (Pp. 182; illustrated; £8.25.) Grune & Stratton: New York. 1975. - Drugs in Combination with Other Therapies. Edited by M. Greenblatt. (Pp. 202; illustrated; £7.70.) Grune & Stratton: New York. 1975. - Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry. Edited by R. O. Pasnau. (Pp. 326; illustrated; £8.80.) Grune & Stratton: New York. 1975. - Borderline States in Psychiatry. Edited by J. E. Mack. (Pp. 146; £7.40.) Grune & Stratton: New York. 1975..
Saul Rosenzweig,Edith Fleming,Louise Rosenzweig (1948). The Children's form of the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study.
D Stone (1950). A Recorded Auditory Apperception Test as a New Projective Technique.
Harry Wilmer (1951). An Auditory Sound Association Technique.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Y. K. Nagle. 2015. \u201cSound Apperception Test: Development and Validation\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A8): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 15 Issue A8
Pg. 49- 54

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-A Classification: FOR Code: 380199

Submission ReceivedApril 11, 2015
RevisedApril 11, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 1, 2015
Published May 15, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 11, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities

Authors: Y. K. Nagle, E. Kalpna Rani (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 129

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4149

Total Downloads (simulated): 2119

Publish Date: 2015 09, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 46 views
Month 2: 36 views
Month 3: 44 views
Month 4: 36 views
Month 5: 35 views
Month 6: 46 views
Month 7: 39 views
Month 8: 43 views
Month 9: 30 views
Month 10: 56 views
Month 11: 21 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 36 views
Month 14: 22 views
Month 15: 43 views
Month 16: 48 views
Month 17: 46 views
Month 18: 14 views
Month 19: 33 views
Month 20: 44 views
Month 21: 32 views
Month 22: 21 views
Month 23: 22 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 47 views
Month 26: 39 views
Month 27: 39 views
Month 28: 33 views
Month 29: 29 views
Month 30: 37 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 22 views
Month 33: 36 views
Month 34: 24 views
Month 35: 17 views
Month 36: 25 views
Month 37: 29 views
Month 38: 21 views
Month 39: 18 views
Month 40: 37 views
Month 41: 30 views
Month 42: 38 views
Month 43: 35 views
Month 44: 30 views
Month 45: 47 views
Month 46: 42 views
Month 47: 18 views
Month 48: 24 views
Month 49: 37 views
Month 50: 39 views
Month 51: 34 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 31 views
Month 54: 26 views
Month 55: 29 views
Month 56: 24 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 33 views
Month 59: 44 views
Month 60: 39 views
Month 61: 29 views
Month 62: 18 views
Month 63: 38 views
Month 64: 40 views
Month 65: 29 views
Month 66: 15 views
Month 67: 41 views
Month 68: 36 views
Month 69: 36 views
Month 70: 32 views
Month 71: 16 views
Month 72: 31 views
Month 73: 38 views
Month 74: 29 views
Month 75: 30 views
Month 76: 28 views
Month 77: 33 views
Month 78: 15 views
Month 79: 42 views
Month 80: 26 views
Month 81: 31 views
Month 82: 31 views
Month 83: 35 views
Month 84: 41 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 19 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 32 views
Month 89: 40 views
Month 90: 12 views
Month 91: 46 views
Month 92: 27 views
Month 93: 24 views
Month 94: 25 views
Month 95: 31 views
Month 96: 26 views
Month 97: 29 views
Month 98: 31 views
Month 99: 29 views
Month 100: 35 views
Month 101: 14 views
Month 102: 21 views
Month 103: 16 views
Month 104: 31 views
Month 105: 17 views
Month 106: 40 views
Month 107: 24 views
Month 108: 13 views
Month 109: 38 views
Month 110: 25 views
Month 111: 17 views
Month 112: 37 views
Month 113: 23 views
Month 114: 31 views
Month 115: 16 views
Month 116: 40 views
Month 117: 10 views
Month 118: 33 views
Month 119: 49 views
Month 120: 27 views
Month 121: 17 views
Month 122: 49 views
Month 123: 37 views
Month 124: 57 views
Month 125: 59 views
Month 126: 69 views
Month 127: 43 views

Total Views: 4149

Total Downloads: 2119

2026 Trends

Research Identity (RIN)

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.