Statistical Analysis of Fractal Image Coding and Fixed Size Partitioning Scheme

Statistical Analysis of Fractal Image Coding and Fixed Size Partitioning Scheme

Samir Bandyopadhyay

Contact

Swalpa Kumar Roy

Contact

Samir Kumar Bandyopadhay

Contact

Debnath Bhattacharyya

Contact

Tai-Hoon Kim

Contact

Statistical Analysis of Fractal Image Coding and Fixed Size Partitioning Scheme

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTGV4TU2F

Statistical Analysis of Fractal Image Coding and Fixed Size Partitioning Scheme Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Fractal Image Compression (FIC) is a state of the art technique used for high compression ratio. But it lacks behind in its encoding time requirements. In this method an image is divided into non-overlapping range blocks and overlapping domain blocks. The total number of domain blocks is larger than the range blocks. Similarly the sizes of the domain blocks are twice larger than the range blocks. Together all domain blocks creates a domain pool. A range block is compared with all possible domains block for similarity measure. So the domain is decimated for a proper domainrange comparison. In this paper a novel domain pool decimation and reduction technique has been developed which uses the median as a measure of the central tendency instead of the mean (or average) of the domain pixel values. However this process is very time consuming.

References

27 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Chong Tong,Minghong Pi (2013). Analysis of a hybrid fractal-predictive-coding compression scheme.
M Barnsley (1988). Fractals Everywhere.
K Falconer (2013). Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications.
B Benoit,Mandelbrot (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature.
N Thao (1996). A hybrid fractal-DCT coding scheme for image compression.
Y Fisher (1995). Fractal Image Compression: Theory and Applications.
M Barnsley,L Hurd (1992). Fractal Image Compression.
A Jacquin (1993). Figure 4: The detection results of the proposed method: (A) original image (B) non-local mean filtering preprocessing result (C) shearlet detection result (D) binarization and refinement result (E) final result..
D Saupe (1996). Fractal Image Compression Via Nearest Neighbor Search.
Behnam Bani-Eqbal (1995). <title>Speeding up fractal image compression</title>.
C Tong,M Pi (2001). Fast Fractal Image Encoding Based on Adaptive Search, Image Processing.
A Lasfar,S Mouline,D Aboutajdine,H Cherifi (2008). Content-based retrieval in fractal coded image databases.
Shen Furao,Osamu Hasegawa (1990). A fast no search fractal image coding method.
Yi-Ming Zhou,Chao Zhang,Zeng-Ke Zhang (2009). An efficient fractal image coding algorithm using unified feature and DCT.
D Duh,J Jeng,S Chen (2005). DCT based simple classification scheme for fractal image compression.
Trieu-Kien Truong,Jyh-Horng Jeng,I Reed,P Lee,A Li (2000). A fast encoding algorithm for fractal image compression using the DCT inner product.
T Cormen,C Leiserson,R Rivest,C Stein (2009). Introduction to Algorithms.
N Ponomarenko,V Lukin,K Egiazarian,J Astola (2002). Modified horizontal vertical partition scheme for fractal image compression.
C Tong,M Wong (1992). Adaptive approximate nearest neighbour search for fractal image compression.
A Jacquin (1989). Image coding based on a fractal theory of iterated contractive image transformations.
Arnaud Jacquin (1990). <title>Fractal image coding based on a theory of iterated contractive image transformations</title>.
B Wohlberg,G Jager (1995). Fast Image Domain Fractal Compression by DCT Domain Block Matching.
S Roy,S Bandyopadhyay,A Mahato,Tai-Hoon Kim (2015). A Speeding Up Fractal Image Compression using Fixed Size Partition and Hierarchical Classification of Sub-Images.
N Bhattacharya,S Roy,U Nandi,S Banerjee (2015). Fractal Image Compression Using Hierarchical Classification of Sub-Images.
D Monro,F Dudbridge (1992). Fractal approximation of image blocks.
D Monro,P Wakefield (null). Zooming with implicit fractals.
A Jacquin (1992). Image coding based on a fractal theory of iterated contractive image transformations.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Samir Bandyopadhyay. 2015. \u201cStatistical Analysis of Fractal Image Coding and Fixed Size Partitioning Scheme\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - F: Graphics & Vision GJCST-F Volume 15 (GJCST Volume 15 Issue F3): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 15 Issue F3
Pg. 9- 20

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-F Classification: I.3.3

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2015
Published January 15, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 21, 2015

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 104

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - F: Graphics & Vision

Authors: Swalpa Kumar Roy, Samir Kumar Bandyopadhay, Debnath Bhattacharyya, Tai-Hoon Kim (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 284

Total Views (Real + Logic): 8306

Total Downloads (simulated): 2020

Publish Date: 2015 08, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 61 views
Month 2: 48 views
Month 3: 61 views
Month 4: 39 views
Month 5: 33 views
Month 6: 51 views
Month 7: 25 views
Month 8: 28 views
Month 9: 49 views
Month 10: 33 views
Month 11: 48 views
Month 12: 37 views
Month 13: 23 views
Month 14: 33 views
Month 15: 32 views
Month 16: 42 views
Month 17: 35 views
Month 18: 23 views
Month 19: 38 views
Month 20: 43 views
Month 21: 34 views
Month 22: 39 views
Month 23: 22 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 23 views
Month 26: 29 views
Month 27: 47 views
Month 28: 24 views
Month 29: 37 views
Month 30: 40 views
Month 31: 41 views
Month 32: 19 views
Month 33: 29 views
Month 34: 34 views
Month 35: 31 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 33 views
Month 38: 25 views
Month 39: 43 views
Month 40: 36 views
Month 41: 20 views
Month 42: 29 views
Month 43: 41 views
Month 44: 37 views
Month 45: 17 views
Month 46: 36 views
Month 47: 19 views
Month 48: 22 views
Month 49: 29 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 27 views
Month 52: 33 views
Month 53: 30 views
Month 54: 36 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 39 views
Month 57: 35 views
Month 58: 43 views
Month 59: 23 views
Month 60: 22 views
Month 61: 28 views
Month 62: 32 views
Month 63: 40 views
Month 64: 41 views
Month 65: 44 views
Month 66: 23 views
Month 67: 32 views
Month 68: 24 views
Month 69: 34 views
Month 70: 19 views
Month 71: 42 views
Month 72: 33 views
Month 73: 36 views
Month 74: 39 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 32 views
Month 77: 31 views
Month 78: 20 views
Month 79: 43 views
Month 80: 30 views
Month 81: 40 views
Month 82: 38 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 40 views
Month 85: 28 views
Month 86: 36 views
Month 87: 23 views
Month 88: 38 views
Month 89: 45 views
Month 90: 33 views
Month 91: 36 views
Month 92: 37 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 27 views
Month 95: 38 views
Month 96: 28 views
Month 97: 32 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 35 views
Month 100: 38 views
Month 101: 38 views
Month 102: 34 views
Month 103: 25 views
Month 104: 29 views
Month 105: 26 views
Month 106: 22 views
Month 107: 26 views
Month 108: 23 views
Month 109: 22 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 28 views
Month 112: 20 views
Month 113: 37 views
Month 114: 37 views
Month 115: 30 views
Month 116: 35 views
Month 117: 28 views
Month 118: 20 views
Month 119: 39 views
Month 120: 23 views
Month 121: 40 views
Month 122: 23 views
Month 123: 33 views
Month 124: 34 views
Month 125: 33 views
Month 126: 25 views
Month 127: 59 views
Month 128: 73 views
Month 129: 66 views

Total Views: 8306

Total Downloads: 2020

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]