Study the Impact of the Drift (Lateral Deflection) of the Tall Buildings Due to Seismic Load in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of RC Shear Walls

Mahdi Hosseini

Study the Impact of the Drift (Lateral Deflection) of the Tall Buildings Due to Seismic Load in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of RC Shear Walls

Mahdi Hosseini * § Department of Civil Engineering, Ph.D., M.Tech., B.Engg., Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Contact

§ Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

Study the Impact of the Drift (Lateral Deflection) of the Tall Buildings Due to Seismic Load in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of RC Shear Walls

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

RE922O2

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Story Drift is defined as the difference in lateral deflection between two adjacent stories. Lateral deflection and drift have three effects on a structure; the movement can affect the structural elements (such as beams and columns); the movements can affect non-structural elements (such as the windows and cladding); and the movements can affect adjacent structures. Without proper consideration during the design process, large deflections and drifts can have adverse effects on structural elements, nonstructural elements, and adjacent structures. Drift problem as the horizontal displacement of all tall buildings is one of the most serious issues in tall building design, relating to the dynamic characteristics of the building during earthquakes and strong winds. Drift shall be caused by the accumulated deformations of each member, such as a beam, column and shear wall. lateral forces due to wind or seismic loading must be considered for tall building design along with gravity forces vertical loads. Tall and slender buildings are strongly wind sensitive and wind forces are applied to the exposed surfaces of the building, whereas seismic forces are inertial (body forces), which result from the distortion of the ground and the inertial resistance of the building.

References

33 Cites in Article

Reference Format

S Duggal (2010). Explicit Inelastic Dynamic Design Procedure for Earthquake Resistant Structures.
A Chopra (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering.
Ananya Kumar,J Ranjan,B Tomar,Jameel Akhtar,Pragya Ranjan,Ritu Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar,Gayacharan Gayacharan,G Mishra,Suman Lata,Jogendra Singh (2000). A novel hydroponic approach for efficient screening and rapid phenotyping for identification of Fusarium wilt resistance in brinjal (Solanum melongena l.) and wild Solanum species.
Jagajyoti Panda,S Adarsh,Samit Ray-Chaudhuri (1993). Seismic fragilities of Indian Standard Code designed ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of nonlinear soil–structure interaction.
Unknown Title.
Unknown Title.
Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1 General provisions and buildings.
(2003). PEP Conceptual Design Report.
R Gary,Sigmund Scarer,Freeman (2004). Design drifts requirement for long period structures.
J Humar,S Yavari (2002). Design of concrete shear wall buildings for earthquake induced torsion". 4'1.
Jost Mo (1993). the seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete framed shear walls using a nonlinear model.
T Paulay,M Priestly (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings.
N Anand,C Mightraj,G Prince Arulraj (2010). Seismic behaviour of RCC shear wall under different soil conditions.
S Anshuman,Bhavin Dipendu Bhunia,Ramjiyani (2011). Solution of shear wall location in multistory building.
A Chandiwala (2008). Earthquake Analysis of Building Configuration with Different Position of Shear Wall.
P Chandurkar,Dr,P Pajgade (2013). Seismic analysis of RCC building with and without shear wall.
H Rahangdale,S Satone (2013). ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORIED BUILDING OF VARYING THICKNESS OF SHEAR WALL ON SLOPING GROUND.
A Agarwal,S Charkha (2012). Effect of change in shear wall location on storey drift of multistorey building subjected to lateral loads.
Shahzad Jamil,Sardar,Umesh Karadi,Effect Of Change In Shear Wall Location On Storey,Of (2007). EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS LINTELS BEAMS ON RESPONSE OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS.
Ujwala Gaikwad,Vithal (2017). International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation.
Dr Mahantesh S Patil 1 (2015). R B Khadiranaikar 2, Dynamic Analysis of High Rise RC Structure with Shear Walls and Coupled Shear Walls.
Prof Mayur Sawant1,Patil2 (2017). Evaluation of Seismic Behaviour of RCC Building Using Coupled Shear wall.
Varsha Barad,Renuka Patel,Falguni Mehta,Megha Goswami,Yati Mehta (2023). RELATING VARIOUS PARAMETERS OF SELLA TURCICA IN SKELETAL CLASS I SUBJECTS HAVING DIFFERENT GROWTH PATTERNS: A CROSS SECTIONAL LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY.
Professors Durgesh,C Rai,K Sudhir,C Jain,Murty (2012). Seismic Design of RC Structures.
(2004). Mariopaz-Structural Dynamics: Theory & computations.
Makar Nageh (2007). How to Model and Design High Rise Building Using ETABS Program.
V Onkar,* Sapate,Dr Pande (2011). A REVIEW OF HIGH RISE STRUCTURE UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD CONTROL WITH SHEAR WALL AND BELT WALL.
* Himalee Rahangdale,S Satone (2013). Design And Analysis Of Multi storeied Building With Effect Of Shear Wall International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications.
Abdur Rahman,Saiada Fuadi Fancy,Ara Shamim,Bobby (June). Analysis of drift due to wind loads and earthquake loads on tall structures by programming language c.
K Kedavkar,P Kodag (2013). Lateral load analysis of RCC building.
M Ashraf,*,Z Siddiqi,M Javed (2008). Configuration Of A Multi storey Building Subjected To Lateral Forces.
Mohammed Aejaz,Ahmed1 Prof,Dr (2015). Shreenivas Reddy Shahpur2 Prof. Brij Bhushan S3 Prof. Rohan Gurav4 Prof. Shaik Abdull5.
A Rahman1,A Masrur Ahmed2,*,M Mamun3 (2012). Drift analysis due to earthquake load on tall structures.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mahdi Hosseini. 2018. "Study the Impact of the Drift (Lateral Deflection) of the Tall Buildings Due to Seismic Load in Concrete Frame Structures With Different Type of RC Shear Walls". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 18 (GJRE Volume 18 Issue E1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 18 Issue E1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-E Classification FOR Code: 090599

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 4, 2018

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering

Authors: Mahdi Hosseini, Prof.N.V.Ramana Rao (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 296

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1439

Total Downloads (simulated): 78

Publish Date: 2018 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 41 views
Month 2: 48 views
Month 3: 59 views
Month 4: 43 views
Month 5: 39 views
Month 6: 57 views
Month 7: 51 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 36 views
Month 10: 40 views
Month 11: 27 views
Month 12: 43 views
Month 13: 29 views
Month 14: 27 views
Month 15: 27 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 27 views
Month 18: 22 views
Month 19: 40 views
Month 20: 36 views
Month 21: 44 views
Month 22: 24 views
Month 23: 27 views
Month 24: 18 views
Month 25: 30 views
Month 26: 36 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 28 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 45 views
Month 31: 27 views
Month 32: 40 views
Month 33: 34 views
Month 34: 20 views
Month 35: 25 views
Month 36: 37 views
Month 37: 38 views
Month 38: 32 views
Month 39: 22 views
Month 40: 39 views
Month 41: 38 views
Month 42: 25 views
Month 43: 33 views
Month 44: 45 views
Month 45: 25 views
Month 46: 30 views
Month 47: 31 views
Month 48: 26 views
Month 49: 17 views
Month 50: 24 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 37 views
Month 53: 10 views
Month 54: 43 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 17 views
Month 57: 29 views
Month 58: 20 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 30 views
Month 61: 39 views
Month 62: 24 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 35 views
Month 66: 41 views
Month 67: 24 views
Month 68: 38 views
Month 69: 25 views
Month 70: 37 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 32 views
Month 73: 40 views
Month 74: 12 views
Month 75: 18 views
Month 76: 24 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 24 views
Month 79: 36 views
Month 80: 31 views
Month 81: 25 views
Month 82: 39 views
Month 83: 27 views
Month 84: 43 views
Month 85: 35 views
Month 86: 26 views
Month 87: 37 views
Month 88: 28 views
Month 89: 32 views
Month 90: 33 views
Month 91: 43 views
Month 92: 32 views
Month 93: 29 views
Month 94: 40 views
Month 95: 16 views
Month 96: 32 views
Month 97: 19 views
Month 98: 29 views
Month 99: 39 views
Month 100: 18 views
Month 101: 27 views
Month 102: 40 views
Month 103: 42 views
Month 104: 31 views
Month 105: 39 views

Total Views: 1.4K

Total Downloads: 78

All Trends