Surgical Management of Type Iii Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – The Biomechanical Basis for Reconstruction

Surgical Management of Type Iii Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – The Biomechanical Basis for Reconstruction

C. Fletcher

Contact

Cary Fletcher

Contact

Surgical Management of Type Iii Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – The Biomechanical Basis for Reconstruction

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C5D57

Surgical Management of Type Iii Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – The Biomechanical Basis for Reconstruction Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is a diarthrodial joint which is stabilized by static and dynamic stabilizers. Acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments and the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments (trapezoid and conoid) and the coracoacromial ligament make up the static stabilizers. The dynamic stabilizers are the deltoid and trapezius muscles. The principles of various surgical techniques involve reduction of the AC joint and were historically classified into two groups: those that focus on primary healing of the CC ligaments and those meant to reconstruct the CC ligaments. Ligament reconstruction must have sufficient immediate stability to prevent acute redisplacement or be protected temporarily until the region heals. The biomechanical basis for reconstructing the CC ligaments in the management of acromioclavicular type 3 injuries is discussed.

References

30 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Augustus Mazzocca,Robert Arciero,James Bicos (2007). Evaluation and Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.
Mark Lemos (1998). The Evaluation and Treatment of the Injured Acromioclavicular Joint in Athletes.
Ryan Costic,Joanne Labriola,Mark Rodosky,Richard Debski (2004). Biomechanical Rationale for Development of Anatomical Reconstructions of Coracoclavicular Ligaments after Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.
K Lee,R Debski,C Chen,S Woo,F Fu (1997). Functional evaluation of the ligaments at the acromioclavicular joint during anteroposterior and superoinferior translation.
Jerome Tossy,Newton Mead,Harley Sigmond (1963). 11 Acromioclavicular Separations.
C Rockwood,G Williams,D Young (1998). Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint.
K Fukuda,E Craig,K An,R Cofield,E Chao (1986). Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint..
Thomas Goss (1993). Double Disruptions of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex.
J Fraser-Moodie,N Shortt,C Robinson (2008). Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint.
E Ceccarelli,R Bondi,F Alviti (2008). Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation:a lack of evidence.
T Schlegel,R Burks,R Marcus (2001). A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations.
G Bannister,W Wallace,P Stableforth,M Hutson (1989). The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial.
J Dias,R Steingold,R Richardson,B Tesfayohannes,P Gregg (1987). The conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Review after five years.
R Fremerey,N Freitag,U Bosch (2005). Complete dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint: operative versus conservative treatment.
S Kumar,S Penematsa,T Selvan (2007). Surgical reconstruction for chronic painful acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
Daniel Guy,Michael Wirth,James Griffin,Charles Rockwood (1998). Reconstruction of Chronic and Complete Dislocations of the Acromioclavicular Joint.
S Lee,E Keefer,M Mchugh,I Kremenic,K Orishimo,S Ben-Avi (2008). Cyclical loading of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions: a comparative biomechanical study.
S Lee,S Nicholas,K Akizuki,M Mchugh,I Kremenic,S Ben-Avi (2003). Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study.
A Faraj,B Ketzer (2001). The use of the hook plate in the management of acromioclavicular injuries: report of ten cases.
Thay Lee,Arthur Black,James Tibone,Patrick Mcmahon (2001). Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: A biomechanical study.
A Deshmukh,D Wilson,J Zilberfarb (2004). Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques on a caderveric model.
Augustus Mazzocca,John Conway,Sean Johnson,Clifford Rios,Mark Dumonski,Steven Santangelo,Robert Arciero (2004). The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
R Simovitch,B Sanders,M Ozbaydar (2009). Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis and management.
Hugh Jones,Mark Lemos,Anthony Schepsis (2001). Salvage of Failed Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Autogenous Semitendinosus Tendon from the Knee.
Mark Tauber,Katharina Gordon,Heiko Koller,Michael Fox,Herbert Resch (2008). Semitendinosus Tendon Graft versus a Modified Weaver-Dunn Procedure for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction in Chronic Cases.
Stephen Nicholas,Steven Lee,Michael Mullaney,Timothy Tyler,Malachy Mchugh (2007). Clinical Outcomes of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions Using Tendon Grafts.
K Thomas,A Litsky,G Jones (2011). Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques.
A Lizaur,L Marco,R Cebrian (1994). Acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Traumatic anatomy and the importance of deltoid and trapezius.
P Domos,F Sim,M Dunne,A White (2017). Current practice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations-national survey.
Koos Korsten,Amy Gunning,Luke Leenen (2014). Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

C. Fletcher. 2018. \u201cSurgical Management of Type Iii Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – The Biomechanical Basis for Reconstruction\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System GJMR-H Volume 17 (GJMR Volume 17 Issue H1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMR Volume 17 Issue H1
Pg. 7- 12

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-H Classification: NLMC Code: WE 168

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2016
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 24, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Jamaica

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System

Authors: Cary Fletcher (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 148

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3466

Total Downloads (simulated): 1763

Publish Date: 2018 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 48 views
Month 2: 41 views
Month 3: 31 views
Month 4: 66 views
Month 5: 43 views
Month 6: 36 views
Month 7: 37 views
Month 8: 35 views
Month 9: 25 views
Month 10: 40 views
Month 11: 42 views
Month 12: 48 views
Month 13: 20 views
Month 14: 36 views
Month 15: 24 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 13 views
Month 18: 26 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 20 views
Month 21: 24 views
Month 22: 23 views
Month 23: 31 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 34 views
Month 26: 37 views
Month 27: 36 views
Month 28: 36 views
Month 29: 18 views
Month 30: 38 views
Month 31: 21 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 48 views
Month 34: 38 views
Month 35: 42 views
Month 36: 29 views
Month 37: 33 views
Month 38: 34 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 36 views
Month 41: 42 views
Month 42: 30 views
Month 43: 40 views
Month 44: 45 views
Month 45: 42 views
Month 46: 29 views
Month 47: 41 views
Month 48: 29 views
Month 49: 30 views
Month 50: 48 views
Month 51: 24 views
Month 52: 14 views
Month 53: 33 views
Month 54: 27 views
Month 55: 29 views
Month 56: 27 views
Month 57: 24 views
Month 58: 17 views
Month 59: 32 views
Month 60: 22 views
Month 61: 18 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 23 views
Month 64: 34 views
Month 65: 30 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 22 views
Month 69: 30 views
Month 70: 45 views
Month 71: 49 views
Month 72: 47 views
Month 73: 37 views
Month 74: 15 views
Month 75: 48 views
Month 76: 36 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 37 views
Month 79: 26 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 16 views
Month 82: 27 views
Month 83: 28 views
Month 84: 24 views
Month 85: 44 views
Month 86: 23 views
Month 87: 23 views
Month 88: 48 views
Month 89: 39 views
Month 90: 45 views
Month 91: 33 views
Month 92: 14 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 44 views
Month 95: 23 views
Month 96: 38 views
Month 97: 50 views
Month 98: 46 views
Month 99: 45 views

Total Views: 3466

Total Downloads: 1763

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]