Surrogate Parameters, Instead of the Genetic Profile, for Recurrence Risk Evaluation in “Early-Stage Breast Cancer Cases” in a Middle – Income Country like Argentina

§ Academia Nacional De Medicina Buenos Aires,

Send Message

To: Author

Surrogate Parameters, Instead of the Genetic Profile, for Recurrence Risk Evaluation in “Early-Stage Breast Cancer Cases” in a Middle – Income Country like Argentina

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MRA6R25

Surrogate Parameters, Instead of the Genetic Profile, for Recurrence Risk Evaluation in “Early-Stage Breast Cancer Cases” in a Middle – Income Country like Argentina Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

Abstarct-Breast Cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer amongst women worldwide and is a leading cause of death and disability among women in low-and middleincome countries (MICs) among which is Argentina. Nowadays in BC, beyond the standard determination of cancer stage according to the classic anatomical criteria of the TNM the study of genic profile (GP) of cancer has also been encouraged. Implementation of the multigene panels assay has led to a change in the manner in which chemotherapy is utilized mainly in patients with, early stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, Her2-neu negative, lymph nodenegative BC ensuring that patients at highest risk of recurrence are prescribed systemic treatment, while at the same time sparing low-risk patients potential adverse events from therapy unlikely to influence their survival. Multigene panels can provide better risk discrimination relative to clinic-pathological factors. Unfortunately, all these tests are expensive.

I. INTRODUCTION

Breast Cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer amongst women worldwide [1] and is a leading cause of death and disability among women in low- and middle-income countries (MICs) among which is Argentina [2].

Nowadays in BC, beyond the standard determination of cancer stage according to the classic anatomical criteria of the TNM classification, expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2/neu receptor are required. The study of genic profile (GP) of cancer has also been encouraged although, for now, not in mandatory form [3]Implementation of the multigene panels assay has led to a change in the manner in which chemotherapy is utilized mainly in patients with, early stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, Her2-neu negative, lymph node-negative[ER ( + ) /HER2(-)/lymph node-negative], BC ensuring that patients at highest risk of recurrence are prescribed systemic treatment, while at the same time sparing low-risk patients potential adverse events from therapy unlikely to influence their survival [4,5].

Multigene panels can provide better risk discrimination relative to clinic-pathological factors, which are significantly superior to traditional prognostic factors in predicting clinical outcome and identifying patients who can be spared chemotherapy safely. There are several tests available at the moment. The Oncotype DX (ODX) BC recurrence test (ODXRS) is the one recommended based on the experience accumulated since its implementation in 2010 [6]

Unfortunately, all these tests are expensive. Oncotype DX (ODX) is expensive and is performed in only 1/3 of patients with BC positive for the estrogen receptor (ER) in developed countries [7,8] and are not affordable or available for the majority of the breast cancer patients globally [9]. The economic non-accessibility and/or technical availability are also the main reasons why in a middle-income country (MIC), such as Argentina, the study is only carried out in very few cases ( 0.23 % ) who fulfilled the established guidelines for gene-expression profile study and in a sporadic way [10].

Given the potential savings in cost and resource utilization, several algorithms have been proposed to predict Oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX RS) using commonly acquired clinical and histopathologic variables designated as subrogate parameters (SP). These studies reached different conclusions regarding which model demonstrated the best statistical discrimination power, mainly due to differences in clinical and pathologic variables used [11-20].

In this study we evaluate the possibility, in a MIC country like Argentina, of having the necessary data from the normally required clinical-pathological report of the BC, in order to apply some selected published algorithms that are offered as alternatives to ODX to predict the ODX RSspecially in patients with "early-stage breast cancer".

II. MATERIAL AND METHODS

a) Data source

We retrospectively reviewed the pathology reports from successive incident BC cases reported, between 2012 and 2014, to PROYCAM2012 (www.cancerdemama2012.org.ar) a consortium (still in force) created for the study of BC in Argentina [10]. The PROYCAM2012 recruited a total of 1832 (stage I to IV) BC until the end of the period under study. From the total of cases reported a subset of 706 (38,5%) "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / lymph node-negative" BC, was identified and analyzed.

b) Surrogate parameters

An online search and selection of published scientific research on the same thematic from 2010 onwards, was carried out[11-20]. The presence of the SP shared by the different studies selected was analyzed in our series, namely: age, tumor size, histology, grade, Estrogen/Progesterone receptor, Her2/neu status and Ki-67.

c) Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, the National Law 25326 of Habeas Data Personal Data Protection and the National Patient Rights Act 26529. For retrospective studies (applies to our study): "for this type of study formal consent is not required".

III. RESULTS

a) Substitute parameters in selected publications

The selected 10 publications were analyzed and the SP used in them identified as shown in table 1.

Table 1: Publications on surrogate parameters published and selected. Characteristics of the selected series.
ReferenceBreast cancer cases (n,%) ER(+; HER2 (-); lymph node-negative/TotalNotification period (years). CountryClinical and pathologic markers required as SP
Auerbach J et al., 2010 (11)138 cases with available Oncotype DX recurrence scoresUSATumor size, patient age, laterality, ER receptor, PR receptor results and HER2/neu result
Dellapasqua S et al. 2012 (12)378/1063 (35,5%)1990-1999 Australia, Canada, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.Age, Histotype, Tumor size, Grade, ER/PgR, Her2/neu status and Ki-67.
Rouanet R et al.,2013 (13)714/1271 (56,1%)1994-2004 FranceHR and HER2 status.HER2-HR+; HER2-HR-; HER2+HR+HER2+HR-
Turner B et al; 2015 (14)299 cases with available Oncotype DX recurrence scores2009-2013 USAER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67, Nottingham score (NS) and tumor size.
Gage MM et al.2015 (15)221ODX-tested ER(+)HER2(-)/lymph node-negative2006-2013 USA.-Low grade and positive progesterone receptor tumors (LG+PR).-High grade or low estrogen receptor (ER) (ER < 20%) tumors (HG/LER).
Özmen V et al., 2016 (16)165 ODX-tested ER(+)HER2(-)/lymph node-negativeTurkeyAge, LN Status, Grade, ER score ≤10%, PR score ≤20% and Ki67 score.
Harowicz MR et al., 2017 (17)305ODX-tested ER (+)/HER2(-)/lymph node-negative2000-2014 USAEstrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status along with different combinations of grade, proliferation indices (Ki-67, mitotic rate), HER2 status, and tumor size.
Farrugia DJ et al,2017 (17)237/614 (38,5%)2010-2014 USAMagee Equation 3 test: ER, PR, HER2 status and Ki-67.
Hanna MG et al.2017 (19)536 ODX-tested ER (+)/ lymph node-negative2007-2013 USASize, ER, PR status, HER2neu, Nottingham and histomorphology.
Orucevic et al,2019 (20)65,754 ODX-tested ER (+)/ HER2 (-)/ lymph node-negative2010-2014USAAge,tumour size, grade, PR status and histologic type.

b) Clinical-pathological characteristics

The subset of 706 (38,5%) "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / lymph node-negative" cases selected from a database of 1832 cases of BC (stages I-IV) showed the following clinic-pathological characteristics (Table 2). The main clinical characteristics that define this group are: predominant in menopausal women (72%), average age of 61 years, 3.2% bilaterally and a personal (30,3%) and/or family history (9,3%) of BC. Pathologically, the average size of the tumors is between 1.8 -2.0, cm according to the left and right side, with predominance of infiltrating ductal lesions (67, 7%) grade2 (46,7%).

c) Substitute parameters evaluated

The frequency of the presence, in the 706 cases of "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / negative lymph node" BC, of the selected SPs is shown in Table 3. Of the total of 8 parameters, 4 (50%) (Age, ER/PR and Her2/neu) are present between 96 and 100 % of cases. The next most frequently found SP were grade ( 94 % ) and size ( 88.5 % ) . Finally, the least frequent were histology 77.5 % and Ki67 expression ( 61.5 % ) .

d) Coincidence between substitute parameters

The percentages in which, in our series, each of the SPs required in the different nomograms is fulfilled and also according to the possibility of a complete application of all SP of each proposed nomogram are shown in table 4. From the total of 10 nomograms selected only in 1 [13] our series can, in the 99.6 % of the cases, complete the required two SPs being them: HR (96, 6 % ) and the Her2/neu ( 100 % ) . In a second nomogram [15] at least 94 % of our cases complete the three of the proposed SPs being these: Grade ( 94 % ) , ER ( 100 % ) and PR ( 99.6 % ) . In a third nomogram [11] at least 88.5 % of the cases complete the required six SPs being these: tumor size ( 88.5 % ) , patient age ( 100 % ) , laterality ( 100 % ) , ER receptor ( 100 % ) , PR receptor ( 99.6 % ) and HER2/neu ( 100 % ) . In a fourth nomogram [19] 77.5 % of cases complete the required six SPs, being these: size ( 88.5 % ) , ER ( 100 % ) , PR status ( 99.6 % ) , HER2neu ( 100 % ) , Nottingham ( 94 % ) and histomorphology ( 77.5 % ) . In a fifth nomogram [20] also a 77.5 % of the cases complete the required five SPs: age ( 100 % ) , tumor size ( 88.5 % ) , grade ( 94 ) , PR status ( 99.6 ) and histologic type ( 77.5 ) . Finally, in the five remaining nomograms evaluated [12,14,16-18] the percentage of cases that could complete the required SPs only reached 61.5 % of the cases in each of them because this was the percentage of cases in which the Ki67 status study was conducted to evaluate the rate of tumor proliferation.

IV. DISCUSSION

BC in Argentina, as we reported earlier, has an epidemiological pattern and an incidence rate typical of a "western" and "developed" country [10] without major variations of both qualifiers in the BCover the last 40 years [21]. We also report that, with the resources currently available, the BC can be staged properly, according to the latest version of the TNM, in 75 % of cases [22] That a subset of no more than 706 (38.5%) of "early" BC "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / negative nodes" come from a database of 1832 new cases of BC, (stages I-IV) recorded between 2012 and 2014, presents its logic. The highest incidence of the whole "early stages" BC in developed countries, due to a massive and continuous use of mammogram screening in these populations [23-25] entails a high frequency of "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / negative nodes" BC. On the contrary, in our population, although the mammography is known and applied, but not in a massive and systematic way the frequency of this kind of BC ("ER (+) / HER2 (-) / negative nodes") is

related to a lowest diagnosis of the whole types of "early stages BC" [10,22].

Genomic platform tests are now considered "standard of care" to maintain treatment decision-making for patients "ER (+) / HER2 (-) / negative lymph node" BC. Previous analyses of genomic platforms testing have assessed hypothetical cohorts under ideal conditions and concluded that testing had low costs relative to its benefits; the application of gene panels in clinical practice avoids overtreatment, with its possible adverse effects, in the short term and toxic in the longer term [26-28] as well as reducing treatment cost [29-31]

MIC countries, such as Argentina, where gross national income per capita is between US 9 , 950 a n d 12,055 per year [32] are mainly characterized by fragmented and poorly coordinated medical care, moderate or high levels of poverty and disparities to access a basic standard of care not only for cancer but also for other complex diseases beyond of being covered by law. Patients in the public environment cannot pay for targeted therapy, so there are currently no hospital laboratories offering genomic platforms.

OncotypeDx® is expensive [the current estimated cost is U$4000 [9]. The cost of the study is the main reason for the almost no realization in the past (2012-13) and nowadays in the MIC countries such as Argentina. None of the health sub-sectors recognizes this study (not included in the oncological diagnosis and treatment protocols accepted by law in our country) for which they do not reimburse their cost. The few cases performed were done privately, paid by the patients and performed abroad the country. For all the mentioned the current tendency, encouraged by research groups, is to use clinic pathologic variables for prediction of low-risk or high-risk OncotypeDx® Recurrence Score (ODXRS) using nomograms models.

Quality prediction models depends on the amount and quality of data derived. In some aspects of the diagnosis of BC our country performs better than expected due to its economic development level. For example, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HR and Her2 / neu is performed routinely in a high percentage of cases, in almost most laboratories for at least more than a decade. As such, IHC is an accessible and relatively inexpensive test and one that can be performed quite quickly. This is in sharp contrast to genomic test that are routinely performed abroad the country resulting in a prolonged time of realization and increased costs. Having, in our series, the results of HR and Her2 / neu in almost all cases, this allows us to apply 5/10 of the selected nomograms in which these required SPs are available between 88.5 % and 99.6 % of the cases. On the contrary, when it is necessary to know the proliferation index studied by the Ki67 expression as SP to fulfill a nomogram, this data is only present in 61.5 % of the cases in the remaining 5 nomograms.

V. CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that MIC oncologists are theoretically well informed in the use of genomic platforms [8,33-36] they are far away from developed in the real-world a practice based in precision oncology; this kind of practice is a great challenge for them and frequently limited, when it is possible, to private practice. Our study, despite its limitations, provides some evidence for the design and orientation in our country of health policies and diagnostic interventions such as nomograms in the treatment of BC cancer, especially in early stages. These nomograms are useful tools to help to decide whether further OncotypeDx® testing is necessary and are excellent surrogates for patients for which OncotypeDx® testing is not affordable or even available. We demonstrate that, although there are gaps in the updated care process (for example: genetic profile) of BC, it is possible to use nomograms in our country through a comprehensive and complete collection and a careful subsequent analysis of the conventional parameters present in the diagnosis of BC. Special emphasis should be noted on the histopathological and immunohistochemical results, available almost routinely in our series, a fact that allows us to evaluate the RS and thus apply the corresponding therapy trying to achieve results similar to those that would be obtained with the use of GP.

Acknowledgement: Marcelo Guruceaga and Natalia Gonçalves for their continued support in the development of this project.

References

36 Cites in Article
  1. F Bray,J Ferlay,I Soerjomataram,R Siegel,L Torre,A Jemal (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
  2. Cynthia Villarreal-Garza,Christian Aguila,Maria Magallanes-Hoyos,Alejandro Mohar,Enrique Bargalló,Abelardo Meneses,Eduardo Cazap,Henry Gomez,Lizbeth López-Carrillo,Yanin Chávarri-Guerra,Raúl Murillo,Carlos Barrios (2013). Breast Cancer in Young Women in Latin America: An Unmet, Growing Burden.
  3. Armando Giuliano,James Connolly,Stephen Edge,Elizabeth Mittendorf,Hope Rugo,Lawrence Solin,Donald Weaver,David Winchester,Gabriel Hortobagyi (2017). Breast Cancer—Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.
  4. Z Siow,De Boer,R Lindeman,G Mann,G (2018). Spotlight on the utility of the Oncotype DX(®) breast cancer assay.
  5. Emily Ross,Julia Swallow,Anne Kerr,Sarah Cunningham‐burley (2018). Online accounts of gene expression profiling in early‐stage breast cancer: Interpreting genomic testing for chemotherapy decision making.
  6. Amila Orucevic,Robert Heidel,John Bell (2016). Utilization and impact of 21-gene recurrence score assay for breast cancer in clinical practice across the United States: lessons learned from the 2010 to 2012 National Cancer Data Base analysis.
  7. J Loncaster,A Armstrong,S Howell,G Wilson,R Welch,A Chittalia,W Valentine,N Bundred (2009). Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
  8. T Ueno,S Saji,N Masuda,H Iwata,K Kuroi,N Sato (2019). Changes in Recurrence Score by neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer and their prognostic implication.
  9. Young Chandler,Clyde Schechter,Jinani Jayasekera,Aimee Near,Suzanne O’neill,Claudine Isaacs,Charles Phelps,G Ray,Tracy Lieu,Scott Ramsey,Jeanne Mandelblatt (2018). Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.
  10. Meiss Kress,R Chuit,R Novellije,E Abalo,A Lorusso (2016). Breast Cancer in Argentina: Analysis from a Collaborative Group for the Study of Female Breast Cancer.
  11. J Auerbach,Mimi Kim,Susan Fineberg (2010). Can Features Evaluated in the Routine Pathologic Assessment of Lymph Node-Negative Estrogen Receptor-Positive Stage I or II Invasive Breast Cancer Be Used to Predict the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score.
  12. Silvia Dellapasqua,Vincenzo Bagnardi,Meredith Regan,Nicole Rotmensz,Mauro Mastropasqua,Giuseppe Viale,Eugenio Maiorano,Karen Price,Richard Gelber,Monica Castiglione-Gertsch,Aron Goldhirsch,Marco Colleoni (2012). A risk score based on histopathological features predicts higher risk of distant recurrence in premenopausal patients with lymph node-negative endocrine-responsive breast cancer.
  13. Philippe Rouanet,Pascal Roger,Emilie Rousseau,Severine Thibault,Gilles Romieu,Andre Mathieu,Jacques Cretin,Gilbert Barneon,Mireille Granier,Aurelie Maran‐gonzalez,Jean Daures,Florence Boissiere,Frederic Bibeau (2014). <scp>HER</scp>2 overexpression a major risk factor for recurrence in pT1a‐bN0M0 breast cancer: results from a <scp>F</scp>rench regional cohort.
  14. Bradley Turner,Kristin Skinner,Ping Tang,Mary Jackson,Nyrie Soukiazian,Michelle Shayne,Alissa Huston,Marilyn Ling,David Hicks (2015). Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score.
  15. Michele Gage,Martin Rosman,W Mylander,Erica Giblin,Hyun-Seok Kim,Leslie Cope,Christopher Umbricht,Antonio Wolff,Lorraine Tafra (2015). A Validated Model for Identifying Patients Unlikely to Benefit From the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay.
  16. Vahit Ozmen,Ajlan Atasoy,Erhan Gokmen,Mustafa Ozdogan,Nilufer Guler,Cihan Uras,Engin Ok,Orhan Demircan,Abdurrahman Isikkdogan,Neslihan Cabioglu,Fatma Sen,Pinar Saip (2016). Correlations Between Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and Classic Risk Factors in Early Breast Cancer: Results of A Prospective Multicenter Study in Turkey.
  17. Michael Harowicz,Timothy Robinson,Michaela Dinan,Ashirbani Saha,Jeffrey Marks,P Marcom,Maciej Mazurowski (2017). Algorithms for prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using clinicopathologic data: a review and comparison using an independent dataset.
  18. Daniel Farrugia,Alessandra Landmann,Li Zhu,Emilia Diego,Ronald Johnson,Marguerite Bonaventura,Atilla Soran,David Dabbs,Beth Clark,Shannon Puhalla,Rachel Jankowitz,Adam Brufsky,Barry Lembersky,Gretchen Ahrendt,Priscilla Mcauliffe,Rohit Bhargava (2017). Magee Equation 3 predicts pathologic response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative/equivocal breast tumors.
  19. Matthew Hanna,Ira Bleiweiss,Anupma Nayak,Shabnam Jaffer (2017). Correlation of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score with Histomorphology and Immunohistochemistry in over 500 Patients.
  20. A Orucevic,J Bell,M King,A Mcnabb,R Heidel (2019). Nomogram update based on TAILORx clinical trial results -Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted using clinicopathologic data.
  21. Meiss Kress,R Novelli,J Abalo,E Lorusso,A Gualtieri,A (2017). Breast Cancer Thirty Years Later: A Comparative Study between A 1983-1984 AND A 2012-2013 Cohorts of Argentine Women.
  22. Meiss Kress,R Novelli,J Gago,F Robles,M Morales,S Et,La (2018). Breast Cancer in Argentina: Feasibility for the Implementation of the New TNM Staging System in A Middle-Income Country.
  23. Francys Verdial,Ruth Etzioni,Catherine Duggan,Benjamin Anderson (2017). Demographic changes in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and age associated with population‐based mammographic screening.
  24. G Vondeling,G Menezes,E Dvortsin,Fga Jansman,I Konings,M Postma,M Rozenbaum (2018). Burden of early, advanced and metastatic breast cancer in The Netherlands.
  25. Gemma Jacklyn,Kevin Mcgeechan,Les Irwig,Nehmat Houssami,Stephen Morrell,Katy Bell,Alexandra Barratt (2017). Trends in stage-specific breast cancer incidence in New South Wales, Australia: insights into the effects of 25 years of screening mammography.
  26. Lyndsay Harris,Nofisat Ismaila,Lisa Mcshane,Fabrice Andre,Deborah Collyar,Ana Gonzalez-Angulo,Elizabeth Hammond,Nicole Kuderer,Minetta Liu,Robert Mennel,Catherine Van Poznak,Robert Bast,Daniel Hayes (2016). Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.
  27. Peter Hall,Alison Smith,Claire Hulme,Armando Vargas-Palacios,Andreas Makris,Luke Hughes-Davies,Janet Dunn,John Bartlett,David Cameron,Andrea Marshall,Amy Campbell,Iain Macpherson,Dan Rea,Adele Francis,Helena Earl,Adrienne Morgan,Robert Stein,Christopher Mccabe (2017). Value of Information Analysis of Multiparameter Tests for Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: The OPTIMA Prelim Trial.
  28. Yun Li,Allison Kurian,Irina Bondarenko,Jeremy Taylor,Reshma Jagsi,Kevin Ward,Ann Hamilton,Steven Katz,Timothy Hofer (2016). The influence of 21-gene recurrence score assay on chemotherapy use in a population-based sample of breast cancer patients.
  29. Stefano Capri,Antonio Russo (2017). Cost of breast cancer based on real-world data: a cancer registry study in Italy.
  30. L Sun,R Legood,I Dos-Santos-Silva,S Gaiha,Z Sadique (2018). Global treatment costs of breast cancer by stage: A systematic review.
  31. Ami Vyas,S Madhavan,Usha Sambamoorthi,Xiaoyun Pan,Michael Regier,Hannah Hazard,Sita Kalidindi (2017). Healthcare Utilization and Costs During the Initial Phase of Care Among Elderly Women With Breast Cancer.
  32. (2025). The World Bank Group Annual Report 2025.
  33. E Mamounas,C Russell,A Lau,M Turner,K Albain (2018). Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era.
  34. H Voelker,L Frey,A Strehl,M Weigel (2018). Practical Consequences Resulting from the Analysis of a 21-Multigene Array in the Interdisciplinary Conference of a Breast Cancer Center.
  35. Allison Kurian,Irina Bondarenko,Reshma Jagsi,Christopher Friese,M Mcleod,Sarah Hawley,Ann Hamilton,Kevin Ward,Timothy Hofer,Steven Katz (2018). Recent Trends in Chemotherapy Use and Oncologists’ Treatment Recommendations for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
  36. J Wang,Z He,Y Dong,J Sun,W Zhang,S Wu (2018). The Distribution and Outcomes of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in T1-T2N0 Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer with Different Histologic Subtypes.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Roberto Kress, Ariel Gualtieri. 2026. "Surrogate Parameters, Instead of the Genetic Profile, for Recurrence Risk Evaluation in “Early-Stage Breast Cancer Cases” in a Middle – Income Country like Argentina". Global Journal of Medical Research GJMR-F Volume 22 (GJMR Volume 22 Issue F3).

Download Citation

Enhanced ALT: Study on genetic profiles and recurrence risk assessment for early-stage breast cancer in Argentine patients.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmr

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-F Classification DDC Code: 616.9944905 LCC Code: RC280.B8
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
April 1, 2022

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 774
Total Downloads: 45
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Surrogate Parameters, Instead of the Genetic Profile, for Recurrence Risk Evaluation in “Early-Stage Breast Cancer Cases” in a Middle – Income Country like Argentina

Roberto Kress
Roberto Kress <p>Academia Nacional De Medicina Buenos Aires,</p>
Ariel Gualtieri
Ariel Gualtieri