Temporary Job and its Impact On Employee Performance

α
Dr.Muhammad Sohail Anwar
Dr.Muhammad Sohail Anwar
σ
Dr.Muhammad Aslam
Dr.Muhammad Aslam
ρ
Dr. Muhammad Rashid Tariq
Dr. Muhammad Rashid Tariq
α University of Lahore

Send Message

To: Author

Temporary Job and its Impact On Employee Performance

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6ZE85

Temporary Job and its Impact On Employee Performance Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Employees are our valuable asset. Objective of an organization can be met with the help of its employees. There are a number of factors on which performance of an employee is depending. Purpose of this research paper is to find how dependent variable employee performance relates to independent variable contract job with facets of uncertainty, loyalty and perks (incentives). Employees have strong association toward job security and incentives. Correlation results show that performance has positive relation with loyalty and incentives but negative with job uncertainty. Between independent variables loyalty shows positive relation with incentives and negatively related with uncertainty. Employee’s performance makes an organization leading in market. To retain their employees it is recommended to provide them job security and to appreciate their work incentives should be provided.

References

36 Cites in Article
  1. R Moorman,G Blakely,B Niehoff (1998). DOES PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT MEDIATE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR?.
  2. D Organ,K Ryan (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional.
  3. Roger Gordon,Wei Li (1995). The change in productivity of Chinese state enterprises, 1983?1987.
  4. Ladders Unknown Title.
  5. Renee Landers,James Rebitzer,Lowell Taylor (1995). Human Resources Practices And The Demographic Transformation Of Professional Labor Markets.
  6. Alison Booth,J Juan,Jeff Dolado,Frank (2002). Introduction: Symposium on Temporary Work.
  7. Alison Booth,Marco Francesconi,Jeff Frank,; Raith,Michael (2002). Specific Knowledge and Performance Measurement.
  8. Matt Richtel (2024). Unbecoming Silicon Valley.
  9. Sherwin Rosen (1982). Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings.
  10. C Cole (2000). Building Loyalty -motivating and keeping employees.
  11. T Bauer,D Truxillo (2000). Temp-topermanent employees: A.
  12. S Ashford,C Lee,P Bobko (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test Academy of Management Journal.
  13. Jeanette Davy,Angelo Kinicki,Christine Scheck (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions.
  14. J Hartley,D Jacobson,B Klandermans,T Van Vuuren (1991). Job insecurity coping with jobs at risk.
  15. T Jick (1985). As the axe falls: Budget cuts and the experience of stress in organizations.
  16. J Barling,K Kelloway (1992). Job insecurity and health: The moderating role of workplace control.
  17. S Ashford,C Lee,P Bobko (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test.
  18. E Roskies,C Louis-Guerin (1990). Job insecurity in managers: Antecedents and consequences.
  19. J Davy,A Kinicki,C Scheck (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions.
  20. Zehava Rosenblatt,Ayalla Ruvio (1996). A test of a multidimensional model of job insecurity: the case of Israeli teachers.
  21. Catherine Heaney,Barbara Israel,James House (1994). Chronic job insecurity among automobile workers: Effects on job satisfaction and health.
  22. Leonard Greenhalgh,Zehava Rosenblatt (1984). Job Insecurity: Toward Conceptual Clarity.
  23. J Hellgren,M Sverke,K Isaksson (1999). A two-dimensional approach to job insecurity: Consequences for employee attitudes and wellbeing.
  24. Michael Jensen,William Meckling,Oyer (2006). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.
  25. G Allen (1989). Employee loyalty: Dead or just different? International Association of Business Communicators.
  26. Futurist (2000). Loyalty fuels increases in productivity.
  27. Marc Drizin,A Schneider (2003). Understanding the connection between loyalty and profit.
  28. W Finnie,R Randall (2002). Loyalty as a philosophy and strategy: An interview with Frederick F. Reichheld.
  29. K Beard,J Edwards (1995). Employees at risk: Contingent work and the psychological experience of contingent workers.
  30. A Davis-Blake,B Uzzi (1993). Determinants of employment externalization: A study of temporary workers and independent contractors.
  31. C Hulin,T Glomb (1999). Contingent employees: Individual and organizational considerations.
  32. J Pearce (1993). TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR OF CONTRACT LABORERS: THEIR PSYCHOLOGICAL INVOLVEMENT AND EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE CO-WORKERS..
  33. L Van Dyne,S Ang (1998). ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR OF CONTINGENT WORKERS IN SINGAPORE..
  34. Daniel Feldman,Helen Doerpinghaus,William Turnley (1995). Managing temporary workers: A permanent HRM challenge.
  35. J Ellingson,M Gruys,P Sackett (1998). Factors related to satisfaction and performance of temporary employees.
  36. J Leininger (2004). The key to retention: Committed employees.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr.Muhammad Sohail Anwar. 1970. \u201cTemporary Job and its Impact On Employee Performance\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 11 (GJMBR Volume 11 Issue A8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 11 Issue A8
Pg. 23- 28
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20907
Total Downloads: 10737
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Employees are our valuable asset. Objective of an organization can be met with the help of its employees. There are a number of factors on which performance of an employee is depending. Purpose of this research paper is to find how dependent variable employee performance relates to independent variable contract job with facets of uncertainty, loyalty and perks (incentives). Employees have strong association toward job security and incentives. Correlation results show that performance has positive relation with loyalty and incentives but negative with job uncertainty. Between independent variables loyalty shows positive relation with incentives and negatively related with uncertainty. Employee’s performance makes an organization leading in market. To retain their employees it is recommended to provide them job security and to appreciate their work incentives should be provided.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Temporary Job and its Impact On Employee Performance

Dr.Muhammad Sohail Anwar
Dr.Muhammad Sohail Anwar University of Lahore
Dr.Muhammad Aslam
Dr.Muhammad Aslam
Dr. Muhammad Rashid Tariq
Dr. Muhammad Rashid Tariq

Research Journals