Texture Feature Abstraction Based on Assessment of HOG and GLDM Features for Diagnosing Brain Abnormalities in MRI Images

Sudheesh K V; L.Basavaraj

Texture Feature Abstraction Based on Assessment of HOG and GLDM Features for Diagnosing Brain Abnormalities in MRI Images

Sudheesh K V * §

Contact

L.Basavaraj

Contact

§ Visveswaraya Technological University

Texture Feature Abstraction Based on Assessment of HOG and GLDM Features for Diagnosing Brain Abnormalities in MRI Images

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CST40IRF

Texture Feature Abstraction Based on Assessment of HOG and GLDM Features for Diagnosing Brain Abnormalities in MRI Images Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The brain tumors are increasing rapidly among the younger generation. The survival of the subject can gradually be increased if the tumors are detected at early stages. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an important technique in detecting the tumors. The images are corrupted by random unwanted information, complicating the automatic feature extraction and the analysis of clinical data. Many methods are existing in present day to remove the unwanted information from the images. Automatic classification is essential because it reduces the cause of human error and where the accuracy is not affected. The work emphasizes on removal of noises from the MRI using the hybrid KSL technique which is the combination of Kernel, Sobel and low pass filter. Features are the properties which describe the whole image. Features from these images are extracted using shape, texture and intensity based techniques. The feature extracted are HOG and GLDM.

References

14 Cites in Article

Reference Format

D Bandhyopadhyay,T Paul (2012). Segmentation of brain mri image-a review.
A Chinnu (2015). Mri brain tumor classification using svm and histogram based image segmentation.
El-Sayed A. El-Dahshan,Heba Mohsen,Kenneth Revett,Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem (2014). Computer-aided diagnosis of human brain tumor through MRI: A survey and a new algorithm.
S Gopinathan,S Poornima (2015). Enhancement of images with speckle noise reduction using different filters.
S Nag,I Kanta,S Roy (2014). A review of image segmentation methods on brain mri for detection of tumor and related abnormalities.
Niranjan Shukla (1956). Lung cancer detection and classification using Support Vector Machine.
D Singh,K Kaur (2012). Classification of Abnormalities in Brain MRI Images Using GLCM, PCA and SVM.
Sonali Patil,Dr Udupi (2012). Preprocessing To Be Considered For MR and CT Images Containing Tumors.
P Mohanaiah,P Satyanarayana,L Gurukumar (2013). Image Texture Feature Extraction using GLCM Approach.
Fritz Albregtsen (2008). Statistical Texture Measures Computed From Gray Level Co Occurrence Matrices.
Robert Haralick,K Shanmugam,Its'hak Dinstein (1973). Textural Features for Image Classification.
Nobuyuki Otsu (1979). A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms.
M Mokji,S Bakar (2007). Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Computation Based On Haar Wavelet.
Rosy Kumari (2013). SVM Classification An Approach on Detecting Abnormality in Brain MRI Images.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Sudheesh V, L.Basavaraj. 2018. "Texture Feature Abstraction Based on Assessment of HOG and GLDM Features for Diagnosing Brain Abnormalities in MRI Images". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - D: Neural & AI GJCST-D Volume 18 (GJCST Volume 18 Issue D2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 18 Issue D2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJCST-D Classification I.4.1

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 29, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 142

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Authors: Sudheesh K V, L.Basavaraj, (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 341

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2091

Total Downloads (simulated): 93

Publish Date: 2018 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 41 views
Month 2: 55 views
Month 3: 48 views
Month 4: 23 views
Month 5: 58 views
Month 6: 38 views
Month 7: 53 views
Month 8: 49 views
Month 9: 30 views
Month 10: 32 views
Month 11: 51 views
Month 12: 37 views
Month 13: 42 views
Month 14: 23 views
Month 15: 13 views
Month 16: 37 views
Month 17: 38 views
Month 18: 39 views
Month 19: 23 views
Month 20: 22 views
Month 21: 41 views
Month 22: 13 views
Month 23: 48 views
Month 24: 28 views
Month 25: 23 views
Month 26: 42 views
Month 27: 44 views
Month 28: 33 views
Month 29: 15 views
Month 30: 33 views
Month 31: 22 views
Month 32: 24 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 35 views
Month 35: 23 views
Month 36: 31 views
Month 37: 26 views
Month 38: 16 views
Month 39: 36 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 31 views
Month 42: 18 views
Month 43: 35 views
Month 44: 15 views
Month 45: 35 views
Month 46: 28 views
Month 47: 30 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 36 views
Month 50: 28 views
Month 51: 36 views
Month 52: 36 views
Month 53: 37 views
Month 54: 22 views
Month 55: 28 views
Month 56: 33 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 35 views
Month 59: 33 views
Month 60: 17 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 44 views
Month 63: 32 views
Month 64: 40 views
Month 65: 37 views
Month 66: 31 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 18 views
Month 69: 25 views
Month 70: 17 views
Month 71: 37 views
Month 72: 38 views
Month 73: 18 views
Month 74: 30 views
Month 75: 15 views
Month 76: 38 views
Month 77: 37 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 27 views
Month 81: 42 views
Month 82: 26 views
Month 83: 22 views
Month 84: 39 views
Month 85: 27 views
Month 86: 32 views
Month 87: 37 views
Month 88: 37 views
Month 89: 51 views
Month 90: 44 views
Month 91: 27 views
Month 92: 33 views
Month 93: 29 views
Month 94: 27 views
Month 95: 47 views
Month 96: 12 views
Month 97: 12 views
Month 98: 32 views
Month 99: 26 views
Month 100: 40 views
Month 101: 40 views
Month 102: 32 views
Month 103: 57 views
Month 104: 29 views

Total Views: 2.1K

Total Downloads: 93

All Trends