The Australian National Curriculum: The 2012 Reformation

α
Danielle de Sousa Santos
Danielle de Sousa Santos
σ
Dirce Djanira Pacheco e Zan
Dirce Djanira Pacheco e Zan

Send Message

To: Author

The Australian National Curriculum: The 2012 Reformation

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

2TH63

The Australian National Curriculum: The 2012 Reformation Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The study presented here is part of the results of postdoctoral research that aimed to investigate the approved curriculum reform in 2012 and implemented in Australia since then. In addition to seeking to know the organization and functioning of the Australian education system, this article intends, specifically, to explain the process of building the country’s national curriculum and identify the dynamics and foundations of the current reform. The methodology used for this research was based on a qualitative, descriptive and analytical approach, based on bibliographic and documentary analysis. From this analysis, it can be concluded, among other things, that the Australian curriculum reform is the result of a long process of debates and ideological political disputes that lasted two decades. In spite of the arguments regarding social equity and justice, the principles and foundations that support this reform are strongly marked by neoliberal ideas. Regarding the consequences of this process, in this text, the obstacles to the implementation of the current national curriculum stand out.

Generating HTML Viewer...

References

31 Cites in Article
  1. Paolo Passaniti (2012). A Cidadania Submersa. O Trabalho Doméstico na Itália entre os Séculos XIX e XX.
  2. (2017). História Antiga (Secundária Sênior) 2017 Geografia (Secundário Sênior) Atualmente em desenvolvimento História Moderna.
  3. Artes-Dança (7-10). Drama, Media Arts, Música e Artes Visuais (F -6) Atualmente em desenvolvimento Artes -Dança.
  4. O desenvolvimento ainda está para ocorrer Artes -Drama.
  5. Ana Marko Kirchhausen,Jorge Villanueva Bustíos (2025). Quien no está listo para la fiesta no está listo para la guerra: pulsiones de vida contra políticas de muerte.
  6. O desenvolvimento ainda está para ocorrer Artes -Música.
  7. O desenvolvimento ainda está para ocorrer Referências Bibliográficas.
  8. Lucas Costa (2012). A implementação do currículo em movimento da educação infantil em uma escola de Brasília.
  9. Acara (2012). Unknown Title.
  10. Belinda Macgill (2014). The Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA)—holding responsibility: the arts curriculum and the cross-curriculum priorities.
  11. Michael Apple (2002). A política do conhecimento oficial: faz sentido a ideia de um currículo nacional?.
  12. Australia (2008). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority Act.
  13. Peter Long (2019). The Australian Advertising Industry: An Overview.
  14. Australia (2013). Australian Qualifications Framework.
  15. Quinette Louw (2014). Peer Review Report For: Rack ‘em, pack 'em and stack ‘em: challenges and opportunities in teaching large classes in higher education [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].
  16. Don Carter (2008). The Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians: what it is and why it needs updating.
  17. Talina Drabsch (2013). The Australian Curriculum.
  18. G Halasz,A Michel (2011). Key competences in Europe: Interpretation, 235 policy formulation and implementation.
  19. Zahira P A Kunhi,Abdulla (2019). An analysis of 'c21 curriculum policy' within Australian contexts.
  20. Marcela Leivas (2005). Desigualdad educativa en contextos de obligatoriedad de la educación secundaria: un estudio sobre el comportamiento de la matrícula y los indicadores de eficiencia interna en el país y en la provincia de Buenos Aires durante el período 2001/2015.
  21. Stuart Macintyre (2009). The Challenge of History in the National Curriculum.
  22. Barry Mcgaw (2010). Statement from ACARA Chair Professor Barry McGaw.
  23. S,D (2019). Unknown Title.
  24. Alan Reid (2019). Changing Australian Education: How policy is taking us backwards and what can be done about it.
  25. Alan Reid (2009). Is this a revolution? A critical analysis of the Rudd government's national education agenda.
  26. Alan Reid,Alan Reid,Deborah Price (2018). The journey towards the first Australian curriculum.
  27. John Rose,Robert (2015). The Australian national curriculum: perspectives of teachers and school administrators on issues and concerns surrounding implementation.
  28. Danielle Santos,Dirce Zan (2022). THE AUSTRALIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM: A LOOK AT EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITIES.
  29. Glenn Savage (2016). Who’s steering the ship? National curriculum reform and the re-shaping of Australian federalism.
  30. Glenn Savage,Sellar,& Sam,Radhika Gorur (2013). Equity and marketisation: emerging policies and practices in Australian education.
  31. Angela Scarini (2018). The Australian Curriculum and its conceptual base: a critical analysis.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Danielle de Sousa Santos. 2026. \u201cThe Australian National Curriculum: The 2012 Reformation\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 23 (GJHSS Volume 23 Issue G2): .

Download Citation

Research Curriculum Education in Australia.
Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 23 Issue G2
Pg. 57- 70
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: DDC Code: 320.54 LCC Code: JC311
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 28, 2023

Language
pt
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1421
Total Downloads: 47
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The study presented here is part of the results of postdoctoral research that aimed to investigate the approved curriculum reform in 2012 and implemented in Australia since then. In addition to seeking to know the organization and functioning of the Australian education system, this article intends, specifically, to explain the process of building the country’s national curriculum and identify the dynamics and foundations of the current reform. The methodology used for this research was based on a qualitative, descriptive and analytical approach, based on bibliographic and documentary analysis. From this analysis, it can be concluded, among other things, that the Australian curriculum reform is the result of a long process of debates and ideological political disputes that lasted two decades. In spite of the arguments regarding social equity and justice, the principles and foundations that support this reform are strongly marked by neoliberal ideas. Regarding the consequences of this process, in this text, the obstacles to the implementation of the current national curriculum stand out.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Australian National Curriculum: The 2012 Reformation

Danielle de Sousa Santos
Danielle de Sousa Santos
Dirce Djanira Pacheco e Zan
Dirce Djanira Pacheco e Zan

Research Journals