The Beauty of Ivy: When Inequality Meets Equality

1
Julia M. Puaschunder
Julia M. Puaschunder
2
Julia Puaschunder
Julia Puaschunder
1 The New School Department of Economics

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 16 Issue B3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

NWH1C

The Beauty of Ivy: When Inequality Meets Equality Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Thomas Piketty’s (2014) Capital in the 21 st Century revolutionized economic thoughts on inequality. Started by the 2008/09 World Financial Crisis and cumulated in the subsequent Occupy movement, attention to rising inequality regarding economic wage, opportunity and wealth led to advocacy for a more equal society. Innovatively, this article argues for a mixture of equality and inequality within a societal network holding value when access to opportunities to transfer implicit wealth is distributed merit-based. By the example of Ivy League educational institutions, but also elaborating on social environments and interaction networks, a novel economic wealth transfer model is proposed. Within an economic system, dyads of unequal crystallized value based on heritage (e.g., royal families, legacy admits) and merit-based equality represented by offspring from families with underprivileged backgrounds, whose outperforming ambition, fluid intelligence and drive may lead to fruitful social interactions and beneficial wealth transfers, may create beneficial economic outcomes. On the societal level, within networks favorable environments may serve as transformation hubs if entered merit-based by underprivileged families.

67 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Brant Abbott,Giovanni Gallipoli (2014). Human Capital Spill-Overs and the Geography of Intergenerational Mobility.
  2. K Arrow,S Bowles,Durlauf,St (1999). Meritocracy and economic inequality.
  3. O Ashenfelter,A Krueger (1994). Estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins.
  4. A Atkinson,A Maynard,C Trinder (1983). Parents and children: Incomes in two generations.
  5. M Bazerman,A Tenbrunsel (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what's right and what to doabout it.
  6. G Becker (1988). Family economics and the inheritance of inequality.
  7. G Becker,N Tomes (1986). Human capital and the rise and fall of families.
  8. George Borjas (1995). Ethnicity, Neighborhoods, and Human Capital Externalities.
  9. Thomas Bouchard,Matthew Mcgue (1981). Familial Studies of Intelligence: A Review.
  10. Samuel Bowles,Herbert Gintis (2002). The Inheritance of Inequality.
  11. S Bowles,H Gintis,M Osborne (2008). Unequal Chances.
  12. A Bozio,T Piketty (2008). Pour un nouveau système de retraite: Des comptes individuels de cotisations finances par repartition.
  13. David Brasington,Mika Kato,Willi Semmler (2010). TRANSITIONING OUT OF POVERTY.
  14. Reuven Brenner (2002). CAPITAL MARKETS AND DEMOCRACY.
  15. W Brock,S Durlauf (2006). Social interactions and macroeconomics.
  16. W Brock,St Magee (1982). The bang-bang model of public utility regulation in intertemporal general equilibrium.
  17. J Broome (1999). Ethics out of economics.
  18. Kerwin Charles,Erik Hurst (2002). The Correlation of Wealth Across Generations.
  19. Raj Chetty,Nathaniel Hendren,Lawrence Katz (2015). The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.
  20. H Clinton (2015). Hillary Clinton comes out strong on green energy.
  21. S Cooper,Durlauf,St,P Johnson (1994). On the evolution of economic status across generations.
  22. Miles Corak,Andrew Heisz (1999). The Intergenerational Earnings and Income Mobility of Canadian Men: Evidence from Longitudinal Income Tax Data.
  23. Paul Costa,Robert Mccrae (1992). Four ways five factors are basic.
  24. Steven Durlauf (2001). A Framework For The Study of Individual Behavior and Social Interactions.
  25. Steven Durlauf (2004). Chapter 50 Neighborhood effects.
  26. S Durlauf (2006). Groups, social influence and inequality: A membership theory perspective on poverty traps.
  27. R Erikson,J Goldthorpe (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in the industrial societies.
  28. H Eysenck,M Eysenck (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach.
  29. T Ghilarducci,M Lee (2005). Female dual labour markets and employee benefits.
  30. A Goldberger (1989). Economic and mechanical models of intergenerational transmission.
  31. A Greenspan (2007). The age of turbulence: Adventures in a new world.
  32. Alfred Greiner,Lars Grüne,Willi Semmler (2012). Economic Growth and the Transition from Non-Renewable to Renewable Energy.
  33. Lawrence Katz,David Autor (1999). Changes in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality.
  34. C Landais,T Piketty,E Saez (2011). Pour une révolution fiscale.
  35. S Lee,N Roys,A Seshadri (2014). The causal effect of parental human capital on children's human capital.
  36. J Loehlin,R Nichols (1976). Heredity, environment and personality.
  37. K Marx (1867). Inhalt.
  38. B Mazumder (2008). Earnings mobility in the U.S.: A new look at intergenerational inequality.
  39. P Menchik (1979). Intergenerational transmission of inequality: An empirical study of wealth mobility.
  40. William Milberg (2013). A Note on Economic Austerity in Science, Morality, and Political Economy.
  41. Jacob Mincer (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution.
  42. C Mulligan (1997). Parental priorities and economic inequality.
  43. Martin Nybom,Jan Stuhler (2014). Interpreting Trends in Intergenerational Income Mobility.
  44. (2010). Tax Policy Reform and Economic Growth.
  45. (2012). Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics.
  46. M Osborne (2002). The determinants of individual earnings: Skills, preferences, and schooling.
  47. M Osborne (2008). Unequal Chances.
  48. E Phelps (1961). The golden rule of accumulation: A fable for growthmen.
  49. T Piketty (2014). Capital in the 21 st century.
  50. Thomas Piketty,Emmanuel Saez,Stefanie Stantcheva (2011). Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities.
  51. T Piketty,M Valdenaire (1995). L'impact de la taille des classes sur la réussite scolaire dans les écoles, collèges et lycées français: Estimations à partir du panel primaire 1997 et du panel secondaire.
  52. Julia Puaschunder (2012). Ethical Decision Making Under Social Uncertainty: An Introduction of Überethicality.
  53. Julia Puaschunder (2012). On the Social Representations of Intergenerational Equity.
  54. J Puaschunder (2015). Meritocracy builds equality. The Worldly Philosopher.
  55. J Puaschunder (2015). Intergenerational transfer model.
  56. R Putnam (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis.
  57. M Robinson (1985). Princeton educated Blacks and the Black community.
  58. Paul Romer (1990). Endogenous Technological Change.
  59. Paul Samuelson (1975). Optimum Social Security in a Life-Cycle Growth Model.
  60. Paul Samuelson (1975). The Optimum Growth Rate for Population.
  61. K Shell (1967). Essays on the theory of optimal growth.
  62. G Solon (1992). Intergenerational income mobility in the United States.
  63. Gary Solon (1999). Intergenerational Mobility in the Labor Market.
  64. P Taubman (1976). The determinants of earnings: Genetic, family, and other environments: A study of White male twins.
  65. J Tobin (1967). Life cycle saving and balanced growth.
  66. Thomas Volscho,Nathan Kelly (2012). The Rise of the Super-Rich.
  67. Loukas Tsoukalis (2009). We Need a New Grand Bargain in Europe.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Julia M. Puaschunder. 2016. \u201cThe Beauty of Ivy: When Inequality Meets Equality\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 16 (GJMBR Volume 16 Issue B3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 16 Issue B3
Pg. 13- 23
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-B Classification: JEL Code: O10
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

April 6, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3879
Total Downloads: 1959
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Thomas Piketty’s (2014) Capital in the 21 st Century revolutionized economic thoughts on inequality. Started by the 2008/09 World Financial Crisis and cumulated in the subsequent Occupy movement, attention to rising inequality regarding economic wage, opportunity and wealth led to advocacy for a more equal society. Innovatively, this article argues for a mixture of equality and inequality within a societal network holding value when access to opportunities to transfer implicit wealth is distributed merit-based. By the example of Ivy League educational institutions, but also elaborating on social environments and interaction networks, a novel economic wealth transfer model is proposed. Within an economic system, dyads of unequal crystallized value based on heritage (e.g., royal families, legacy admits) and merit-based equality represented by offspring from families with underprivileged backgrounds, whose outperforming ambition, fluid intelligence and drive may lead to fruitful social interactions and beneficial wealth transfers, may create beneficial economic outcomes. On the societal level, within networks favorable environments may serve as transformation hubs if entered merit-based by underprivileged families.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Beauty of Ivy: When Inequality Meets Equality

Julia Puaschunder
Julia Puaschunder

Research Journals