The End of Derivatives? What the European Union Model Forebodes, and the Subsequent Stock Market Effect

α
Ronald Stunda
Ronald Stunda
σ
Ronald A. Stunda
Ronald A. Stunda
α Valdosta State University Valdosta State University

Send Message

To: Author

The End of Derivatives? What the European Union Model Forebodes, and the Subsequent Stock Market Effect

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEBY7WP

The End of Derivatives? What the European Union Model Forebodes, and the Subsequent Stock Market Effect Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

In 2011 The European Union Tax Commission proposed the establishment of a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT). The FTT was subsequently implemented in France (8/1/12) and Italy (1/1/13). It is also scheduled to be adopted in 9 other European Union states during 2015. Great Britain has thus far failed to accept such a tax. The purpose of the FTT is twofold; minimize and control derivative trading by taxing it, and raise revenues. Opponents of the FTT have suggested that such a tax would increase volatility (i.e., risk) in the securities market and would also lead to a reduction in security trading and a drop in security prices. These are all reasons why Great Britain has thus far refrained from passing the tax.

References

42 Cites in Article
  1. Adam Smith,Institute (2011). EU Financial Transaction Tax Would Wipe Out Derivative Markets in the UK.
  2. G Allayannis,J Weston (2001). The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Market Value.
  3. Rob Bauer,Nadja Guenster,Rogér Otten (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance.
  4. J Berry (2003). Derivative Divide Financial Sages Greenspan Says they Reduce Risk but Buffet calls them Dangerous.
  5. R Ball,P Brown (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income. 11. Numbers.
  6. William Beaver,Roger Clarke,William Wright (1979). The Association between Unsystematic Security Returns and the Magnitude of Earnings Forecast Errors.
  7. G Bodnar,G Hayt,R Marston,W Smithson (1995). Wharton Study of Derivative Usage by U.S. Firms.
  8. J Campbell,J Grossman,Wang (1993). The Econometrics of Financial Markets.
  9. (2013). Options for Reducing the Deficit-Tax on Financial Transactions.
  10. W Conrad,R Hameed,Niden (1994). Capital market Equilibrium with Transaction Costs.
  11. A Cornfield (1996). Some Recent Innovations in International Finance: The Case for Derivatives.
  12. D Epps,Epps (1976). Liquidity and Stock Returns.
  13. Young Ernst,Center (2015). Financial Transaction Tax Center Update.
  14. J Fletcher (2000). The Relation Between Beta and Returns in International Stock exchanges.
  15. A Gallant,Peter Rossi,George Tauchen (1992). Stock Prices and Volume.
  16. S Gilani (2008). The Real Reason for the Global Financial Crisis.
  17. W Guay (1999). The Impact of Derivatives on Firm Risk.
  18. Ludger Hentschel,S Kothari (2001). Are Corporations Reducing or Taking Risks with Derivatives?.
  19. G Hiemstra,P Jones (1994). Differential Information and Dybamic Behavior of Stock Trading Volume.
  20. P James,F Edmister (1983). Dividend Capture in NASDAQ Stocks.
  21. A Kuprianov (1995). Case Studies of Large Losses in the Derivatives Market, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
  22. Josef Lakonishok,Seymour Smidt (1986). Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading.
  23. C Lamoureux,J Lastrapes (1990). Market Effects of Changes in the S&P 500 Index.
  24. C Lamoureux,J Lastrapes (1994). Tax-Induced Trading Around Ex-Dividend Days.
  25. Anwar Husain,Tejas Trikha,Adam Husain,Azeem Khalifa,Nathan Leung (1992). Comparing the Returns of Holding Stocks in the Dow Jones Index Constant vs. Investing in the Actively Updated Dow Index.
  26. J Lilti,H Montagner (1998). Beta Size and Returns on the French Stock Market.
  27. Andrew Lo,Jiang Wang (2005). Stock Market Trading Volume.
  28. Andrew Marshall (2000). Foreign exchange risk management in UK, USA and Asia Pacific multinational companies.
  29. D Morse (1980). Asymmetric Information in Securities Markets.
  30. J Muller,W Verschoor (2005). The Impact of Corporate Derivative Usage on Foreign Exchange Risk Exposure.
  31. P Newman (1994). The Real Story of an Insurance Giant's Fall.
  32. I Petrova (2009). FINANCIAL MARKETS, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, AND FINANCIAL CRISIS.
  33. P Sefcik,W Thompson (1986). Evidence that Volume Sustains Price Change.
  34. M Sivey (2015). Why Derivatives May be the Biggest Risk for the Global Economy, BusinessTime.com.
  35. David Skeel,F Partnoy (2007). Shaming in Corporate Law.
  36. H Smidt (1990). Do Demand Curves for Stock Slope Down.
  37. S Stickel,R Verrecchia (1994). The Ex-Dividend Behavior of Non-Convertible Preferred Stock Returns and Trading.
  38. René Stulz (2009). Credit Default Swaps and the Credit Crisis.
  39. I Tkac (1996). A Trading Volume Benchmark: Theory and Evidence.
  40. Avinash Persaud (2015). Financial Transaction Taxes.
  41. J Wolfson,C Crawford (2010). Lessons from the Current Financial Crisis.
  42. B Ying (1966). Trading Volume and Correlation in Stock Returns.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ronald Stunda. 2016. \u201cThe End of Derivatives? What the European Union Model Forebodes, and the Subsequent Stock Market Effect\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 15 (GJMBR Volume 15 Issue C11): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 15 Issue C11
Pg. 7- 15
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-C Classification: FOR Code: B13
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 11, 2016

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3900
Total Downloads: 2084
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

In 2011 The European Union Tax Commission proposed the establishment of a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT). The FTT was subsequently implemented in France (8/1/12) and Italy (1/1/13). It is also scheduled to be adopted in 9 other European Union states during 2015. Great Britain has thus far failed to accept such a tax. The purpose of the FTT is twofold; minimize and control derivative trading by taxing it, and raise revenues. Opponents of the FTT have suggested that such a tax would increase volatility (i.e., risk) in the securities market and would also lead to a reduction in security trading and a drop in security prices. These are all reasons why Great Britain has thus far refrained from passing the tax.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The End of Derivatives? What the European Union Model Forebodes, and the Subsequent Stock Market Effect

Ronald A. Stunda
Ronald A. Stunda

Research Journals