The energy-environment puzzle – reconciling conflicting goals

Article ID

6P6L6

The energy-environment puzzle – reconciling conflicting goals

Miguel Schloss
Miguel Schloss
DOI

Abstract

Unpacking knotty performance issues. We are in the midst of profoundly significant, changing and challenging times. By now it should be clear that various technologies (such as geothermal, renewables, green hydrogen) to decarbonize energy generation and overcome our global warming issues don’t appear to have generated the much-needed global carbon emission reductions, despite heavy early investments in decarbonization to generate major savings in climate costs. Adding all up, the evidence strongly suggests that our progress doesn’t seem to add much. Could it be that we are running faster, only to stay in place — and in the end despite all the alleged efforts, our progress is bound to fall short of the agreed decarbonization and global warming goals? Clearly, developments so far, while helpful and promising, are just too limited to meet the mark. We need much faster or, better yet, more effective efforts to achieve tangible progress to meet the global demand at the pace the world is growing. To this end, we must become increasingly aware that we are seeking competing(if not conflicting) objectives between economic development, environmental improvement and affordability. This paper, which is aimed at explaining for skeptics and believers alike the need for a more “strategic” way of planning, to assess every step of the way the trade-offs we are making between the competing goals to archieve maximum impact with reasonably minimum or manageable input. To do so, we must ourselves wean out of the tendency to emphasize process over actions and results. International gatherings too often become vanity shows to celebrate the issuance of more rules and regulations that in the end make the investment processes more complex and expensive, which deflect us from focusing on substantive actions and results on the ground. For too long, international for a have pressed for combating symptoms, not causes, focusing o n processes, not results. A reorientation from words to deeds and closer attention on what we are achieving is now in order.

The energy-environment puzzle – reconciling conflicting goals

Unpacking knotty performance issues. We are in the midst of profoundly significant, changing and challenging times. By now it should be clear that various technologies (such as geothermal, renewables, green hydrogen) to decarbonize energy generation and overcome our global warming issues don’t appear to have generated the much-needed global carbon emission reductions, despite heavy early investments in decarbonization to generate major savings in climate costs. Adding all up, the evidence strongly suggests that our progress doesn’t seem to add much. Could it be that we are running faster, only to stay in place — and in the end despite all the alleged efforts, our progress is bound to fall short of the agreed decarbonization and global warming goals? Clearly, developments so far, while helpful and promising, are just too limited to meet the mark. We need much faster or, better yet, more effective efforts to achieve tangible progress to meet the global demand at the pace the world is growing. To this end, we must become increasingly aware that we are seeking competing(if not conflicting) objectives between economic development, environmental improvement and affordability. This paper, which is aimed at explaining for skeptics and believers alike the need for a more “strategic” way of planning, to assess every step of the way the trade-offs we are making between the competing goals to archieve maximum impact with reasonably minimum or manageable input. To do so, we must ourselves wean out of the tendency to emphasize process over actions and results. International gatherings too often become vanity shows to celebrate the issuance of more rules and regulations that in the end make the investment processes more complex and expensive, which deflect us from focusing on substantive actions and results on the ground. For too long, international for a have pressed for combating symptoms, not causes, focusing o n processes, not results. A reorientation from words to deeds and closer attention on what we are achieving is now in order.

Miguel Schloss
Miguel Schloss

No Figures found in article.

Miguel Schloss. 2026. “. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research – H: Environment & Environmental geology GJSFR-H Volume 25 (GJSFR Volume 25 Issue H3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
Not Found
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 79
Total Downloads: 16
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The energy-environment puzzle – reconciling conflicting goals

Miguel Schloss
Miguel Schloss

Research Journals