The Field of aBetweena a A New Principle for Interdisciplinary Epistemology

α
Hisaki Hashi
Hisaki Hashi
α University of Vienna University of Vienna

Send Message

To: Author

The Field of aBetweena  a  A New Principle for Interdisciplinary Epistemology

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

94478

The Field of aBetweena  a  A New Principle for Interdisciplinary Epistemology Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Introduction-Contrary to the established field of mathematical philosophy, interdisciplinary research in physics and philosophy is not well known. Of course, there are the writings of physicists for the nonscientific public introducing selected topics for mass media distribution. Yet in the presentation of highly advanced theories to an audience of physicists, reflections on philosophy do not have a place. On the other hand, reports are written by specialists in scientific theory in which the authors oppose the traditional philosophy of continental Europe. Since the 19th century renowned philosophers have put forward theories interpreting areas of natural science, trying to insert them into the framework of methods traditionally applied in natural philosophy. What is lacking is an interdisciplinary philosophical reflection for contemporary science in which a philosopher is able to grasp the principles of physical thinking, reflecting physical theory in relation to the fundamental philosophical conception of the subject: ‘What is Truth’. To achieve this purpose for interdisciplinary research, philosophers should have a fundamental knowledge of physics. Vice versa, physicists should also learn the purpose of philosophical reflection and what the goals of philosophy are. The philosophy of science does not offer the same explanations for theories in physics or other natural sciences, but its goal is a fundamental reflection of ‘What is truth’, as a common basis for different intellectual disciplines.

References

31 Cites in Article
  1. Aristotle,; Metaphysik,Schwarz (1984). Physik.
  2. Niels Bohr (1963). Das Quantenpostulat und die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik.
  3. Max Born,Einstein,Albert,Briefwechsel (2005). Unknown Title.
  4. Albert Einstein (1990). Grundzüge der Relativitätstheorie.
  5. Albert Einstein,Podolsky,Boris,Nathan Rosen (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?.
  6. Hisaki (1998). Das Feld des Zwischen -Zur system-externen Logik der Quantenphysik', see Interdisziplinäre Philosophie der Gegenwart. -'Information und Wirklichkeit', see Interdisziplinäre Philosophie der Gegenwart. -'Das Feld des ‚Zwischen.
  7. emerging-staying-vanishing.
  8. 生住滅 Chines,Nakamura (2005). Classics of Mahayana Buddhism (大乗仏 典), vol. 5, Huayan-Sutra, Lankavatra-Sutra (kegon-kyō, ryōga-kyō.
  9. Physik Duden,Mannheim (1998). A thesis from the view of natural philosophy to this phenomenon is executed by Hans-Dieter Klein in a deduction from his system theory: "Systemtheorie und Monadologie.
  10. (2006). Naturphilosophie und Naturwissenschaft. Denkansätze bei Hegel und bei Popper.
  11. Werner Heisenberg (1990). Unknown Title.
  12. Immanuel Kant (1990). Kritik der reinen Vernunft.
  13. Monadologie (1998). Unknown Title.
  14. H.-D Klein (2003). Inwiefern ist das teleologische Konzept der modernen Physik immanent?.
  15. Masayuki Shiga (1990). Unknown Title.
  16. Nakamura Hajime (2002). Classics of Mahayana Buddhism.
  17. Noe Keiichi (1998). Nishida Philosophy, Place, Field and Quantum Phenomena.
  18. Okada Yasuhiro (1999). Organism, Brain and Life (生命、 脳、いのち.
  19. Herbert Pietschmann,Quantenmechanik Verstehen (2003). Von der Klassischen Mechanik zur Quantenmechanik.
  20. Parmenides Plato (1989). Inhalt.
  21. Karl Popper (1959). Objektive Erkenntnis (Objective Knowledge.
  22. Rupert Riedl (1987). Evolution und Selbstbezug der Erkenntnis.
  23. Erwin Schrödinger (1932). Über den Indeterminismus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft Millieau bedingt?.
  24. Chris Swoyer (2004). The Autonomy of Relations.
  25. Jikidō (1993). Buddology and Indology (bukkyō indo shisō jiten).
  26. Sam Treiman (1999). The Odd Quantum.
  27. Friedrich Wallner (1992). The Split of Austrian Philosophy. Wittgenstein and Popper.
  28. Hideki (1956). 心臓病学研究の進歩 : とくに補助人工心臓および心臓移植について(循環器学2008年の進歩).
  29. Anton Zeillinger,Einsteins Schleier (2005). Die neue Welt der Quantenphysik.
  30. Einsteins Spuk (2007). Teleportation und andere Mysterien der Quantenphysik.
  31. Zhuangzi Zhuangzi (荘子) (1978). Laozi, Zhuangzi (老 子・荘子).

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Hisaki Hashi. 2015. \u201cThe Field of aBetweena a A New Principle for Interdisciplinary Epistemology\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue H1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 220304
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 20, 2015

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4272
Total Downloads: 2160
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Introduction-Contrary to the established field of mathematical philosophy, interdisciplinary research in physics and philosophy is not well known. Of course, there are the writings of physicists for the nonscientific public introducing selected topics for mass media distribution. Yet in the presentation of highly advanced theories to an audience of physicists, reflections on philosophy do not have a place. On the other hand, reports are written by specialists in scientific theory in which the authors oppose the traditional philosophy of continental Europe. Since the 19th century renowned philosophers have put forward theories interpreting areas of natural science, trying to insert them into the framework of methods traditionally applied in natural philosophy. What is lacking is an interdisciplinary philosophical reflection for contemporary science in which a philosopher is able to grasp the principles of physical thinking, reflecting physical theory in relation to the fundamental philosophical conception of the subject: ‘What is Truth’. To achieve this purpose for interdisciplinary research, philosophers should have a fundamental knowledge of physics. Vice versa, physicists should also learn the purpose of philosophical reflection and what the goals of philosophy are. The philosophy of science does not offer the same explanations for theories in physics or other natural sciences, but its goal is a fundamental reflection of ‘What is truth’, as a common basis for different intellectual disciplines.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Field of aBetweena a A New Principle for Interdisciplinary Epistemology

Hisaki Hashi
Hisaki Hashi

Research Journals