The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer; Aditi Singha Mooumi

The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer *

Contact

Aditi Singha Mooumi

Contact

The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

I8S1S

The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

There is interest in the research whether a Global Administrative law is appearing and, assuming this is the case, regardless of whether this is awesome or something else. This paper tends to the inquiry of thoughts for world administrative law. It thinks about the possible sources and their appropriateness as a reason for a worldwide regulatory guideline framework: first, the by and huge procedural norms that have arisen in public administrative law frameworks, profoundly the statute of lawfulness and due framework standards; second, the arrangement of the rule of guideline esteems, advanced by utilizing defenders of free change and financial progressivism; third, the correct administration method and extra essentially straightforwardness, support, and responsibility; lastly, common liberties esteems. The paper closes on a suspicious note, presuming that a consistently happening set of regulatory law principles is difficult to see and not, at this point[especially]eye catching. To begin with the global administrative guideline is particularly a Western build, protecting Western interests. It might moreover impact ominously on developing economies. Besides, the development of world regulatory law in adjudicative sheets is a principle to an unwanted ‘juridical formation of the political cycle.

References

51 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Allison (2000). A continental distinction in the common law: A historical and comparative perspective on English public law.
Michael Barr,Geoffrey Miller (2006). Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel.
J Bell (2006). Comparative administrative law.
E Benvenisti (2004). The interplay between actors as a determinant of the evolution of administrative law in international institutions.
L Bressman (2007). Procedures as politics in administrative law.
T Carothers (1998). The rule of law revival.
A Dicey (1915). Development of Administrative Law in England.
D Dyzenhaus (2009). Accountability as a Value in Global Governance and for Global Administrative Law.
Angela Eikenberry,Verónica Arroyave,Tracy Cooper (2007). Administrative Failure and the International NGO Response to Hurricane Katrina.
G Frankenberg (1985). Critical comparisons: Rethinking comparative law.
Lon Fuller (1958). Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.
L Fuller (1999). The law in quest of itself.
J Finnis (2007). On Hart's Ways: Law as Reason and as Fact.
Robert Gorman (2004). The Development of International Employment Law: My Experience on International Administrative Tribunals at the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.
G Hermerén (2012). The principle of proportionality revisited: interpretations and applications.
D Howland (2015). An alternative mode of international order: The international administrative union in the nineteenth century.
D Hall (2006). Democracy and Bureaucracy.
B Jackson (1989). Ideas of law and legal administration: a semiotic approach.
O Kahn-Freund (1974). On uses and misuses of comparative law.
Benedict Kingsbury,Lorenzo Casini (2009). Global Administrative Law Dimensions of International Organizations Law.
B Kingsbury,M Donaldson (2015). Global administrative law. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law.
N Krisch,B Kingsbury (2006). Introduction: global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order.
Jerry Mashaw (2005). Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations, 1787-1801.
U Mattei (1997). Comparative law and economics.
S Marks (2004). Public Goods and Global Administrative Law.
Ralf Michaels (2006). The Functional Method of Comparative Law.
Kalypso Nicolaidis,Gregory Shaffer (2004). Managed Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government.
Randall Peerenboom (2003). A Government of Laws: Democracy, rule of law and administrative law reform in the PRC.
Ravi Pereira (2010). Why Would International Administrative Activity Be Any Less Legitimate? — A Study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Stephen Perry (1998). Hart's Methodological Positivism.
R Posner (1996). Family Law and Social Norms.
Paul Reinsch (1909). International Administrative Law and National Sovereignty.
Susan Rose-Ackerman (2010). Regulation and public law in comparative perspective.
P Sales (2013). Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law.
Jürgen Schwarze (2004). ENLARGEMENT, THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION, AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.
R Stewart (2003). Administrative law in the twenty-first century.
J Spigelman (2005). The Principle of Legality and the Clear Statement Principle.
Alan Watson (1978). Comparative Law and Legal Change.
E Zoller (2008). Introduction to Public Law: A Comparative Study.
K Zweigert,H Kötz,T Weir,H Kötz,T Weir (1998). <b>K Zweigert and H Kötz, AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE LAW</b> Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. 3rd edn. Trans by Tony Weir. xxvi and 714 pp. ISBN 0 19 826859 9. (pb) £28.99..
Y Arai-Takahashi (2002). The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR.
S Buck (2013). Understanding environmental administration and law.
R Butterworth,A Blandford (1999). The Principle of Rationality and Models of Highly Interactive Systems.
E Criddle (2010). Mending Holes in the Rule of (Administrative) Law.
Tiberiu Dragu,Mattias Polborn (2013). The Administrative Foundation of the Rule of Law.
Eric Engle (2012). Gay Rights in Russia? Russia's Ban on Gay Pride Parades and the General Principle of Proportionality in International Law.
Daniel Griffiths,Ann Hart,Billie Blair (1991). Still Another Approach to Administration: Chaos Theory.
(1993). Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology.
H Jones (1958). Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul.
David Rosenbloom,Rosemary O’leary,Joshua Chanin (1996). Public Administration and Law.
Antonin Scalia (1989). The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Shah Jubaer, Aditi Mooumi. 2021. "The Global Administrative Law: A Comparative Study". Global Journal of Human-Social Science, Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue F3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 21 Issue F3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-F Classification FOR Code: 360199

Submission ReceivedApril 10, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 1, 2021
Published May 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 10, 2021

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 544

Total Downloads: 46

All Trends