The Good Reasons for the Holy See Emotions: Outlining an Argumentative Analysis of the Responsum on the Blessing of Same-Sex Unions

Article ID

UT0TF

Insightful research on the blessing of same-sex unions and their social implications.

The Good Reasons for the Holy See Emotions: Outlining an Argumentative Analysis of the Responsum on the Blessing of Same-Sex Unions

Gabriel Campos Fernandino
Gabriel Campos Fernandino
DOI

Abstract

Relying on the work Les bonnes raisons des émotions: Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné (2011), by Christian Plantin, we carried out a short argumentative analysis of a responsum issued by the Holy See in the year of 2021 which addresses the subject of the blessing imparted to same-sex unions. This is an official statement published by the highest leadership of the Catholic Church which, in response to questions arising from lower hierarchical levels of the institution, asserts that the Church does not have the power to bless such unions. Following Plantin’s understanding (2011), we aim to look at a presumed dichotomy between reasons and emotions in our corpus. It is in the light of this approach, which takes emotion as one of the constraints of discourse, that we argue about the inseparability of reasons and emotions in the argumentation of the selected text.

The Good Reasons for the Holy See Emotions: Outlining an Argumentative Analysis of the Responsum on the Blessing of Same-Sex Unions

Relying on the work Les bonnes raisons des émotions: Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné (2011), by Christian Plantin, we carried out a short argumentative analysis of a responsum issued by the Holy See in the year of 2021 which addresses the subject of the blessing imparted to same-sex unions. This is an official statement published by the highest leadership of the Catholic Church which, in response to questions arising from lower hierarchical levels of the institution, asserts that the Church does not have the power to bless such unions. Following Plantin’s understanding (2011), we aim to look at a presumed dichotomy between reasons and emotions in our corpus. It is in the light of this approach, which takes emotion as one of the constraints of discourse, that we argue about the inseparability of reasons and emotions in the argumentation of the selected text.

Gabriel Campos Fernandino
Gabriel Campos Fernandino

No Figures found in article.

Gabriel Campos Fernandino. 2026. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 23 (GJHSS Volume 23 Issue A4): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 23 Issue A4
Pg. 25- 30
Classification
GJHSS-A Classification: FoR: 1606, 2204
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 1132
Total Downloads: 28
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Good Reasons for the Holy See Emotions: Outlining an Argumentative Analysis of the Responsum on the Blessing of Same-Sex Unions

Gabriel Campos Fernandino
Gabriel Campos Fernandino

Research Journals