The Impact of Exchange Rate on Economic Growth – Case Studies of Countries in the Asean Region

α
Mai Thi Phuong Thuy
Mai Thi Phuong Thuy
σ
Pham Thi Ha An
Pham Thi Ha An
ρ
Nguyen Thanh Binh
Nguyen Thanh Binh
Ѡ
Ho Le Nguyet Cam
Ho Le Nguyet Cam

Send Message

To: Author

The Impact of Exchange Rate on Economic Growth – Case Studies of Countries in the Asean Region

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

HCN3K

The Impact of Exchange Rate on Economic Growth – Case Studies of Countries in the Asean Region Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The study reflects the impact of an effective multilateral exchange rate in the 1989-2018 period on the economic growth rate of 5 ASEAN countries, including Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Malaysia. To estimate this model, the author uses the Fixed Effects and Random Effects panel data estimation method. Hausman test shows the model calculated using the Fixed Effects method is more suitable than the Random Effects method. In the estimation model, however, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation came using the Fixed Effects method. Using Prais-Winsten (PCSE) process, the authors overcame the phenomenon. The final model shows that an improvement of 1% in the effective exchange rate would have a positive impact, growing the five countries’ economic growth rate by 16.2%.

References

36 Cites in Article
  1. Ma. Alguacil,Ana Cuadros,Vicente Orts (2002). Foreign direct investment, exports and domestic performance in Mexico: a causality analysis.
  2. P Arestis,Baltarct (2018). A Model of Economic Growth for an Open Emerging Country: Empirical Evidence for Brazil, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
  3. B Balasu,V Salisu,M (1999). Foreign Direct Investment as an Engine of Growth.
  4. Parantap Basu,Chandana Chakraborty,Derrick Reagle (2003). Liberalization, FDI, and Growth in Developing Countries: A Panel Cointegration Approach.
  5. Michael Bleaney,David Greenaway (2001). The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa.
  6. Bohl Martin,T Michaelis,Philipsiklos Pierre,L (2015). Austerity and Recovery: Exchange Rate Regime Choice, Economic Growth and Financial Crises.
  7. Joaquin Cottani,Domingo Cavallo,M Khan (1990). Real Exchange Rate Behavior and Economic Performance in LDCs.
  8. Dani Rodrik (2008). the real exchange rate and Economic growth.
  9. J De Mello (1997). Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: A selective survey.
  10. David Dollar (1992). Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985.
  11. R Duttagupta (2006). Real exchange Rate Levels and Economic Development: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence.
  12. Thais Camolesi Guimarães,Mariana Nicolletti,Annelise Vendramini Felsberg,Ligia Ramos,Fernanda Casagrande Rocha,Mario Monzoni Neto (2010). Adaptation to climate change and integration of disaster risk management in business education: a case study in Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil.
  13. D Ghura,T Grennes (1993). The real exchange rate and macroeconomic performance in sub-Saharan Africa.
  14. Pablo Glüzmann,Eduardo Levy-Yeyati,Federico Sturzenegger (2012). Exchange rate undervaluation and economic growth: Díaz Alejandro (1965) revisited.
  15. Gregory Papanikos (2015). The real exchange rate of euro and Greek economic growth.
  16. E Habib,L Mileva,Stracca (2017). The real exchange rate and economic growth: Revisiting the case using external instruments.
  17. Mona Haddad,Ann Harrison (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?.
  18. S Hadj Fraj,M Hamdaoui,S Maktouf (2018). Governance and economic growth: The role of the exchange rate regime.
  19. D Karadam,And Özmen,E King,R Levine,R (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right.
  20. Mohsin Khan,Abdelhak Ssnhadji (2001). Threshold Effects in the Relationship between Inflation and Growth.
  21. Jaeseok Lee,Chengyan Yue (2017). Impacts of the US dollar (USD) Exchange Rate on Economic Growth and the Environment in the United States.
  22. R Levine (2005). Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence.
  23. Philippe Aghion,Steven Durlauf (2009). From Growth Theory to Policy Design.
  24. Eduardo Levy-Yeyati,Federico Sturzenegger,Pablo Gluzmann (2013). Fear of appreciation.
  25. Xiaoying Li,Xiaming Liu (2004). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship.
  26. Norman Loayza,Pablo Fajnzylber,Cesar Calderon (2005). Economic Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean.
  27. James Markusen,Anthony Venables (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development.
  28. Susan Ofair Razin,Collins (1997). Real exchange rate Misalignment and Growth.
  29. Rafael Ribeiro,John Mccombie,Gilberto Lima (2019). Does real exchange rate undervaluation really promote economic growth?.
  30. Robert Barro (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.
  31. M Romer (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth.
  32. Michael Sarel (1995). Nonlinear Effects of Inflationon Economic Growth.
  33. Miguel Sidrauski (1967). Inflation and Economic Growth.
  34. Stein Jerome,L (1995). the natural real exchange rate of the United States Dollar, and Determinants of Capital Flows.
  35. Bo Tang (2014). Real exchange rate and economic growth in China: A cointegrated VAR approach.
  36. Paulo Vaz,Werner Baer (2014). Real exchange rate and manufacturing growth in Latin America.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mai Thi Phuong Thuy. 2020. \u201cThe Impact of Exchange Rate on Economic Growth – Case Studies of Countries in the Asean Region\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 20 (GJMBR Volume 20 Issue B8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 20 Issue B8
Pg. 13- 20
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-B Classification: JEL Code: E5, E52, E51
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 24, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2389
Total Downloads: 1092
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The study reflects the impact of an effective multilateral exchange rate in the 1989-2018 period on the economic growth rate of 5 ASEAN countries, including Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, and Malaysia. To estimate this model, the author uses the Fixed Effects and Random Effects panel data estimation method. Hausman test shows the model calculated using the Fixed Effects method is more suitable than the Random Effects method. In the estimation model, however, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation came using the Fixed Effects method. Using Prais-Winsten (PCSE) process, the authors overcame the phenomenon. The final model shows that an improvement of 1% in the effective exchange rate would have a positive impact, growing the five countries’ economic growth rate by 16.2%.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Impact of Exchange Rate on Economic Growth – Case Studies of Countries in the Asean Region

Pham Thi Ha An
Pham Thi Ha An
Nguyen Thanh Binh
Nguyen Thanh Binh
Ho Le Nguyet Cam
Ho Le Nguyet Cam

Research Journals