Loading menu…

The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on the Banking Performance: Comparison between the Model Franco-Italian and the Model Germano- Nippon

§ University of Sfax

Send Message

To: Author

The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on the Banking Performance:  Comparison between the Model Franco-Italian and the Model Germano-  Nippon

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEQ5H0C

The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on the Banking Performance:  Comparison between the Model Franco-Italian and the Model Germano-  Nippon Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The goal of this research is to treat the influence of governance mechanisms on the banking performance in two systems of governance universal. There are three models of governance virtually universal. We are going to put the light on the model germano-Nippon and the model Franco-Italian and on the measures of the performance. Then, we will analyze the effects that exercise internal governance mechanisms on the social performance of banks belong to the context germano-Nippon and the context Franco-Italian. To estimate the performance, we retained three performance measures that are ROA, ROE and MTB, and to apprehend the governance we retained the council of administration, its size, its independence and the concentration of capital. In order to study the impact of the internal governance on the banking performance in the context germano-Nippon and the context Franco-Italian. In this framework, we have produced mixed results, which differ from one context to another.

References

27 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Renée Adams,Hamid Mehran (2003). Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies?. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 123-142.
  2. 2. Anup Agrawal,Charles Knoeber (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377.
  3. 3. Anup Agrawal,Jeffrey Jaffe,Gershon Mandelker (1992). « The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly. » The Journal of Finance. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1605-1621.
  4. 4. Barclay Mr,C. Hoderness (1991). Negotiated blocktrades and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 46, 861-878.
  5. 5. Berger A.N,E. Patti (2003). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2002.0(54), 1-37.
  6. 6. Brian Boyd (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301-312.
  7. 7. Gerard Caprio,Luc Laeven,Ross Levine (2006). Governance and Bank Valuation. Governance and Bank valuation
  8. 8. Carleton Willard,T. James,M. Nelson,Weisbach Mr,S. (1998). The Influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence From TIAA-CREF. The Journal of Finance, 4, 1335-1362.
  9. 9. Charreaux G (1997). The Government of businesses corporate governance, theory and fact. The Government of businesses corporate governance, theory and fact
  10. 10. R. Crespi,A. Garcia-Cestona Mr,Salas v (2004). Governance Mechanisms in Spanish Banks. Does ownership matter?. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(10), 2311-2330.
  11. 11. Of P,Valledo E (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570-2580.
  12. 12. L. Godard (2002). The size of the Board of Directors: determinants and impact on the performance. Notebook of Fargo, 4-11.
  13. 13. Benjamin Hermalin,Michael Weisbach (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1)
  14. 14. P. The (2000). ownership structure, institutional investors and the performance of the company: The point on the knowledge. Management, International Review of Management, 25(3), 58-69.
  15. 15. Machesnay (1991). Economy of the enterprise, Eyrolles Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1034-1062.
  16. 16. Mc J,Servaes H (1990). additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612.
  17. 17. Pieter Moerland (1995). Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 26(1), 17-34.
  18. 18. M. Omri (2002). The Role of Institutional Investors and the performance of Tunisian businesses. Cahiers Africans to Public Administration
  19. 19. M. Paquerot (1997). Strategies of rooting of leaders, performance of the firm and the structure of control. the Government of enterprises
  20. 20. Lynn PI,Stephen Timme (1993). Corporate control and bank efficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2-3), 515-530.
  21. 21. G. Pinteris (2002). ownership structure, board characteristics and performance of Argentina Banks.
  22. 22. Prowse S (1985). Corporate Governance: International Comparison. Revue d'économie financière
  23. 23. Paula Rechner,Dan Dalton (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155-160.
  24. 24. D. Rhoades (2001). A Meta‐analysis of Board Leadership Structure and Financial Performance: are “two heads better than one”?. Two Heads Better Than One?", Corporate Governance-An International Review, 9, 311-319.
  25. 25. Andrei Shleifer,Robert Vishny (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
  26. 26. Spong K,Deyoung R,Sullivan R.J (1996). What makes a bank efficient? A look at financial characteristics and bank management and ownership structure.
  27. 27. Whidbee David,A. (1997). Board Composition and Control of Shareholder Voting Rights in the Banking Industry. Financial Management, 26(4), 27-41.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Yosra Elhaj Ali. 2016. "The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on the Banking Performance: Comparison between the Model Franco-Italian and the Model Germano- Nippon". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 16 (GJMBR Volume 16 Issue 18 (C6)).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-C Classification JEL Code: G29
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
June 1, 2016

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.3K
Total Downloads: 81
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on the Banking Performance: Comparison between the Model Franco-Italian and the Model Germano- Nippon

Yosra Ali
Yosra Ali University of Sfax