The Legal Regulation Model of Open Banking in China

1
Mi Wang
Mi Wang
1 Liaoning University

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 23 Issue H4

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6B0I8

The Legal Regulation Model of Open Banking in China Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Although, open banking has been developed rapidly in China since 2018, there is not a clear legal regulatory framework. Open banking can stimulate competition, provide better services to customers, and reduce the traditional “screen-scrapping” risk. However, it causes concerns over data security, customer privacy, data abuse and challenges to current Chinese regulatory system. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a better regulatory system for open banking in China. Through learning from regulation forms in other jurisdiction, it is found that “active guidance” regulation is more appropriate for China which requires government to provide standards for open banking but not force banks to share data. Under the “Active Guidance” model, it is necessary to improve current Chinese regulatory and legal regime including establishing feasible rules for data portability implementation, constructing a multi-level regulatory system for data sharing, as well as changing data privacy protection mode from “Notice-Consent” to “Data Autonomy”.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Mi Wang. 2026. \u201cThe Legal Regulation Model of Open Banking in China\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 23 (GJHSS Volume 23 Issue H4): .

Download Citation

Open banking in China.
Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 23 Issue H4
Pg. 33- 49
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: LCC: K564.C6
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 19, 2023

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1333
Total Downloads: 19
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Although, open banking has been developed rapidly in China since 2018, there is not a clear legal regulatory framework. Open banking can stimulate competition, provide better services to customers, and reduce the traditional “screen-scrapping” risk. However, it causes concerns over data security, customer privacy, data abuse and challenges to current Chinese regulatory system. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a better regulatory system for open banking in China. Through learning from regulation forms in other jurisdiction, it is found that “active guidance” regulation is more appropriate for China which requires government to provide standards for open banking but not force banks to share data. Under the “Active Guidance” model, it is necessary to improve current Chinese regulatory and legal regime including establishing feasible rules for data portability implementation, constructing a multi-level regulatory system for data sharing, as well as changing data privacy protection mode from “Notice-Consent” to “Data Autonomy”.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Legal Regulation Model of Open Banking in China

Mi Wang
Mi Wang Liaoning University

Research Journals