The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem

Diego Araujo Reis; FÃ¡bio Rodrigues de Moura; Iracema Machado de AragÃ£o

The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem

Diego Araujo Reis *

Contact

FÃ¡bio Rodrigues de Moura

Contact

Iracema Machado de AragÃ£o

Contact

The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

M4283

The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

Abstract

An innovation ecosystem is characterized by numerous interactions between its various components. The proper functioning of an innovation ecosystem is a necessary condition to increase the chances of successful innovative activities. This research aims to investigate the relationship between input and output in the innovation ecosystem of countries. For the empirical evaluation, the Global Innovation Index (GII) was used as a proxy of the innovation ecosystem. This index tracks innovation inputs and innovation products in various countries. Using annual country data, an unconditional quantile regression model was estimated to identify the structural relationship between innovation input and output, including with lag application. Our findings show that innovation input has a significant and positive effect on innovation output in countries. These findings are useful for national innovation policies, since they emphasize the need to promote better innovation incentives.

References

68 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Ron Adner (2017). Ecosystem as Structure.
R Andrade,G Domingos (2017). Policies and Institutions Fostering Innovation and Agriculture Technologies in Brazil.
Robert Atkinson (2013). Innovation in cities and innovation by cities.
Mohammad Al-Sudairi,Saad Haj Bakry (2014). Knowledge issues in the global innovation index: Assessment of the state of Saudi Arabia versus countries with distinct development.
Stefan Bache,Christian Dahl,Johannes Kristensen (2013). Headlights on tobacco road to low birthweight outcomes.
Ross Brown (2016). Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems.
D Campbell,E Carayannis,S Rehman (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: the USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison.
Elias Carayannis,Thorsten Barth,David Campbell (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation.
Elias Carayannis,Ruslan Rakhmatullin (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond.
Maurizio Carpita,Enrico Ciavolino (2017). A generalized maximum entropy estimator to simple linear measurement error model with a composite indicator.
C Chaminade,M Moskovko (2015). Radical Institutional Change: Enabling the Transformation of Georgia's Innovation System.
D Chen,S Zheng,L Guo (2015). The Impact of Science and Technology Policies on Rapid Economic Development in China.
P Cooke (2008). Regional Innovation Systems, Clean Technology and Jacobian Cluster-Platform Policies.
Nuno Crespo,Cátia Crespo (2016). Global innovation index: Moving beyond the absolute value of ranking with a fuzzy-set analysis.
Linus Dahlander,David Gann (2010). How open is innovation?.
O Dedehayir,M Seppänen (2015). Birth and Expansion of Innovation Ecosystems: A Case Study of Copper Production.
Ozgur Dedehayir,J Ortt,Marko Seppänen (2017). Disruptive change and the reconfiguration of innovation ecosystems.
G Dosi (1988). Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silver- berg, and Luc Soete (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory.
S Dutta,D Benavente (2011). Measuring Innovation Potential and Results: The Best Performing Economies.
S Dutta,D Benavente,S Wunsch-Vincent (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth.
S Dutta,D Benavente,S Wunsch-Vincent (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: Local Dynamics Keep Innovation Strong in the Face of Crisis.
S Dutta,Benavente,R Reynoso,A Bernard,B Lanvin,S Wunsch-Vincent (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: Nurturing New Sources of Growth by Developing the Human Factor in Innovation.
S Dutta,A Bernard,R Reynoso,B Lanvin,S Wunsch-Vincent (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development.
S Dutta,R Reynoso,J Litner,B Lanvin,S Wunsch-Vincent,K Saxena (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation.
S Dutta,R Reynoso,J Litner,B Lanvin,S Wunsch-Vincent,F Guadagno (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World.
J Ecuru,D Kawooya (2015). Effective Innovation Policies for Development: Uganda.
W Easterly,R Levine (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models.
C Edquist (1997). Systems of Innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations.
Henry Etzkowitz,Loet Leydesdorff (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations.
C Freeman (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective.
M Goedhuys,H Hollanders,P Mohnen (2015). Innovation Policies For Development.
Leonid Gokhberg,Vitaliy Roud (2016). Structural changes in the national innovation system: longitudinal study of innovation modes in the Russian industry.
Joseph Gogodze (2016). Mechanisms and Functions within a National Innovation System.
S Gopalakrishnan,J Dasgupta (2015). Policies to Drive Innovation in India.
E Helpmann (2004). The Mystery of Economic Growth.
Carlos Hernández,Domingo González (2017). Study of the Start-Up Ecosystem in Lima, Peru: Analysis of Interorganizational Networks.
H Hollanders (2013). Regional and Local Systems of Innovation in Aguascalientes.
D Jackson (2010). What is an Innovation Ecosystem?.
Barbara Jankowska,Anna Matysek-Jędrych,Katarzyna Mroczek-Dąbrowska (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems – Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index.
Roger Koenker (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data.
B Lundvall (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
L Leydesdorff,H Etzkowitz (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations.
Travis Lybbert,Gracious Diiro,Dick Kawooya,Sacha Wunsch-Vincent (2017). Enhancing Innovation in the Ugandan Agri-Food Sector: Robusta Coffee Planting Material & Tropical Fruit Processing.
J Moore (1996). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems.
Enrico Moretti (2004). Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data.
R Nelson (1993). Manual de Oslo: Diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. 3ª Ed.
(2005). Organization and functioning.
(2010). Organization and functioning.
L Poh (2016). From Research to Innovation to Enterprise: The Case of Singapore.
David Powell (2017). Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects in the Presence of Covariates.
B Remneland Wikhamn,W Wikhamn (2013). Structuring of the Open Innovation Field.
R Reynoso,A Bernard,M Saisana,M Schaaper,S Wunsch-Vincent,F Guadagno (2015). Benchmarking Innovation Outperformance at the Global and Country Levels.
M Saisana (2011). Index.
M Saisana,D Philippas (2012). Statistical tests on the Global Innovation Index.
M Saisana,D Philippas (2013). Index.
M Saisana,A Saltelli (2014). Joint Research Centre Statistical Audit of the 2014 Global Innovation Index.
M Saisana,M Domínguez-Torreiro (2015). Joint Research Centre Statistical Audit of the 2015 Global Innovation Index.
M Saisana,M Domínguez-Torreiro,D Vertesy (2016). Index.
M Saisana,M Domínguez-Torreiro,D Vertesy (2017). Figure 13.3. WBT innovation scores in the Global Competitiveness Index (2008 and 2017).
Joseph Schumpeter (1934). The Theory of Economic Development.
R Scott,S Vincent-Lancrin (2014). Educating Innovators and Entrepreneurs.
D Slater,P Wruuck (2012). We Are All Content Creators Now: Measuring Creativity and Innovation in the Digital Economy.
So Sohn,Dong Kim,Song Jeon (2016). Re-evaluation of global innovation index based on a structural equation model.
Jon Sundbo,Faïz Gallouj (1998). Innovation as a Loosely Coupled System in Services.
V Vlasova,T Kuznetsova,V Roud (2017). Drivers and limitations of Russia’s development based on the evidence provided by the Global Innovation Index.
S Wunsch-Vincent (2012). Accounting for Science-Industry Collaboration in Innovation: Existing Metrics and Related Challenges.
David Teece (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.
Q Xiangjiang,J Peng,J Kelly (2013). Open Innovation: The View of an ICT Leader in Distributed Global Innovation.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Diego Araujo Reis, FÃ¡bio Rodrigues de Moura, Iracema Machado de AragÃ£o. 2021. "The Linkage between Input and Output in the Innovation Ecosystem". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue H3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 21 Issue H3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-H Classification FOR Code: 280107

Submission ReceivedFebruary 11, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted March 1, 2021
Published March 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 22, 2021

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 680

Total Downloads: 57

All Trends