Loading menu…

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

§ University of Liverpool

Send Message

To: Author

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR7S4I9

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The paper posits the modified interfacial gravity (MIG) as the modified gravity in the interfacial region between homogeneous baryonic matter region and homogeneous dark matter region. The MIG model contains both dark matter and modified gravity to unify the CDM (Cold Dark Matter) model, MOG (Modified Gravity), and MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics). In MIG, the interfacial repulsive Yukawa force in the interfacial region to separate baryonic matter region and dark matter region is equivalent to the repulsive Yukawa force in outer galaxy in MOG.The modified interfacial gravity is interfacial gravity interacting with the interfacial repulsive Yukawa force. The modified interfacial gravity emerges in the interfacial region between dark matter region and baryonic matter region only when the homogeneous surface density is above the critical homogeneous surface density in both dark matter region and baryonic matter region. The critical homogeneous surface density is derived from the acceleration constant a0 from MOND. The four separate regions in the galaxy structure in MIG are the core (inner) baryonic matter galaxy with the Newtonian gravity, the interfacial (outer) baryonic matter galaxy with the modified interfacial gravity, the interfacial (inner) external dark matter halo with the modified interfacial gravity, and the core (outer) external dark matter halo with the Newtonian gravity. Dark matter in the external dark matter halo is cold dark matter without electromagnetism as in CDM. CDM and MIG are identical during the very early universe below the critical homogeneous surface density and before the emergence of the modified interfacial gravity. After the emergence of the modified interfacial gravityby dense giant molecular clouds during the early universe, MOND, MOG, and MIG are identical for baryonic matter galaxy structure. MIG explains galaxy evolution, globular clusters, dwarf galaxy plane, dark matter halo in galaxy cluster, the rotation velocities, and the failure to detect directly dark matter on earth.

References

27 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Ding-Yu Chung (2014). Galaxy Evolution by the Incompatibility between Dark Matter and Baryonic Matter. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 04(02), 374-383.
  2. 2. C. Frenk,S. White (2012). Dark matter and cosmic structure. Annalen der Physik, 524(9-10), 507-534.
  3. 3. J. Brownstein,J. Moffat (2006). Galaxy Rotation Curves without Nonbaryonic Dark Matter. The Astrophysical Journal, 636(2), 721-741.
  4. 4. J. Moffat,S. Rahvar (2013). The MOG weak field approximation and observational test of galaxy rotation curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 436(2), 1439-1451.
  5. 5. M. Milgrom (1983). A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. The Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365.
  6. 6. Mordehai Milgrom (2002). MOND—theoretical aspects. New Astronomy Reviews, 46(12), 741-753.
  7. 7. Benoît Famaey,Stacy McGaugh (2012). Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions. Living Reviews in Relativity, 15(1), 10.
  8. 8. Benoit Famaey,Stacy McGaugh (2013). Challenges for ΛCDM and MOND.
  9. 9. J. H.Gundlach (2007). Laboratory Test of Newton’s Second Law for Small Accelerations. Physical Review Letters, 98(15), 150801.
  10. 10. M. Milgrom (1989). Concerning the preferred surface density of giant molecular clouds in the Galaxy. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 37-40.
  11. 11. Mordehai Milgrom (2009). The central surface density of ‘dark haloes’predicted by MOND. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398(2), 1023-1026.
  12. 12. Ding-Yu Chung,Volodymyr Krasnoholovets (2013). The Space Structure, Force Fields, and Dark Matter. Journal of Modern Physics, 04(04), 27-31.
  13. 13. P. Anderson (1972). More Is Different. Science, 177(4047), 393-396.
  14. 14. Ding-Yu Chung (2015). The Basic Cause of Superconductivity. Journal of Modern Physics, 06(01), 26-36.
  15. 15. J. Hubbard (1963). Electron correlations in narrow energy bands.
  16. 16. (2011). From dwarf spheroidals to cD galaxies: simulating the galaxy population in a ΛCDM cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 413(1), 101-131.
  17. 17. (2012). The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: ACT-CL J0102-4215 `El Gordo,' A Massive Merging Cluster at Redshift 0.87. The Astrophysical Journal, 748(1), 7.
  18. 18. (2005). The distribution of satellite galaxies: the great pancake. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363(1), 146-152.
  19. 19. Neil Ibata,Rodrigo Ibata,Benoit Famaey,Geraint Lewis (2014). Velocity anti-correlation of diametrically opposed galaxy satellites in the low-redshift Universe. Nature, 511(7511), 563-566.
  20. 20. O. Zahn (2012). Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints on the Duration And Timing of Reionization from the South Pole Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal, 65.
  21. 21. O. Eggen,D. Lynden-Bell,A. Sandage (1962). Evidence from the motions of old stars that the Galaxy collapsed. The Astrophysical Journal, 136, 748.
  22. 22. Stacy McGaugh (2012). THE BARYONIC TULLY–FISHER RELATION OF GAS-RICH GALAXIES AS A TEST OF ΛCDM AND MOND. The Astronomical Journal, 143(2), 40.
  23. 23. N. Pitjev,E. Pitjeva (2013). Constraints on dark matter in the solar system. Astronomy Letters, 39(3), 141-149.
  24. 24. (2011). THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 2419: A CRUCIBLE FOR THEORIES OF GRAVITY. The Astrophysical Journal, 738(2), 186.
  25. 25. P. Cote (2000). Evidence for the Hierarchical Formation of the Galactic Spheroid. The Astrophysical Journal, 533(2), 869-883.
  26. 26. T. Brown (2012). The Primeval Populations of the Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 753(1), L21.
  27. 27. N. al (2013). LoCuSS: THE MASS DENSITY PROFILE OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS AT z = 0.2. The Astrophysical Journal, 769(2), L35.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ding-Yu Chung. 2015. "The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 15 (GJSFR Volume 15 Issue 23 (A3)).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification FOR Code: 260201
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
June 10, 2015

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2K
Total Downloads: 114
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

Ding-Yu Chung
Ding-Yu Chung