The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

Ding-Yu Chung

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

Ding-Yu Chung * §

Contact

§ University of Liverpool

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR7S4I9

The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The paper posits the modified interfacial gravity (MIG) as the modified gravity in the interfacial region between homogeneous baryonic matter region and homogeneous dark matter region. The MIG model contains both dark matter and modified gravity to unify the CDM (Cold Dark Matter) model, MOG (Modified Gravity), and MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics). In MIG, the interfacial repulsive Yukawa force in the interfacial region to separate baryonic matter region and dark matter region is equivalent to the repulsive Yukawa force in outer galaxy in MOG.The modified interfacial gravity is interfacial gravity interacting with the interfacial repulsive Yukawa force. The modified interfacial gravity emerges in the interfacial region between dark matter region and baryonic matter region only when the homogeneous surface density is above the critical homogeneous surface density in both dark matter region and baryonic matter region.

References

27 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. D Chung (2014). Galaxy Evolution by the Incompatibility between Dark Matter and Baryonic Matter. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4, 374-383.
2. C Frenk,S White (2012). Dark matter and cosmic structure. Annalen der Physik, 524(9-10), 507-534.
3. J Brownstein,J Moffat (2006). Galaxy Rotation Curves without Nonbaryonic Dark Matter. The Astrophysical Journal, 636(2), 721-741.
4. J Moffat,S Rahvar (2013). The MOG weak field approximation and observational test of galaxy rotation curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 436(2), 1439-1451.
5. M Milgrom (1983). A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365-370.
6. M Milgrom (2002). MOND--theoretical aspects. New Astronomy Reviews, 46, 741-753.
7. B Famaey,S Mcgaugh (2012). Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND):Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions. Living Review Relativity, 15, 10.
8. Benoit Famaey,Stacy Mcgaugh (2013). Challenges for ΛCDM and MOND. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 437, 012001.
9. J Gundlach,S Schlamminger,C Spitzer,K-Y Choi,B Woodahl,J Coy,E Fischbach (2007). Laboratory Test of Newton’s Second Law for Small Accelerations. Physical Review Letters, 98(15), 150801.
10. M Milgrom (1989). Concerning the preferred surface density of giant molecular clouds in the Galaxy. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 211, 37-40.
11. M Milgrom (2009). The central surface density of 'dark haloes'predicted by MOND. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, 1023-1026.
12. Ding-Yu Chung,Volodymyr Krasnoholovets (2013). The Space Structure, Force Fields, and Dark Matter. Journal of Modern Physics, 04(04), 27-31.
13. P Anderson (1972). More Is Different. Science, 177(4047), 393-396.
14. Ding-Yu Chung (2015). The Basic Cause of Superconductivity. Journal of Modern Physics, 06(01), 26-36.
15. J Hubbard (2004). Extended Mosaic Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager. Proceedings of the Royal Society A A, 609, 498-512.
16. Q Guo (2011). From dwarf spheroidals to cD galaxies: simulating the galaxy population in a ΛCDM cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 413, 101-131.
17. Felipe Menanteau,John Hughes,Cristóbal Sifón,Matt Hilton,Jorge González,Leopoldo Infante,L Felipe Barrientos,Andrew Baker,John Bond,Sudeep Das,Mark Devlin,Joanna Dunkley,Amir Hajian,Adam Hincks,Arthur Kosowsky,Danica Marsden,Tobias Marriage,Kavilan Moodley,Michael Niemack,Michael Nolta,Lyman Page,Erik Reese,Neelima Sehgal,Jon Sievers,David Spergel,Suzanne Staggs,Edward Wollack (2012). THE ATACAMA COSMOLOGY TELESCOPE: ACT-CL J0102–4915 “EL GORDO,” A MASSIVE MERGING CLUSTER AT REDSHIFT 0.87. The Astrophysical Journal, 748(1), 7.
18. N Libeskind (2005). The distribution of satellite galaxies: the great pancake. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363, 146-152.
19. Neil Ibata,Rodrigo Ibata,Benoit Famaey,Geraint Lewis (2014). Velocity anti-correlation of diametrically opposed galaxy satellites in the low-redshift Universe. Nature, 511(7511), 563-566.
20. O Zahn (2012). Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints on the Duration And Timing of Reionization from the South Pole Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal, 756, 65.
21. O Eggen,D Lynden-Bell,A Sandage (1962). Evidence from the motions of old stars that the Galaxy collapsed. The Astrophysical Journal, 136, 748.
22. Stacy Mcgaugh (2012). THE BARYONIC TULLY–FISHER RELATION OF GAS-RICH GALAXIES AS A TEST OF ΛCDM AND MOND. The Astronomical Journal, 143(2), 40.
23. N Pitjev,E Pitjeva (2013). Constraints on dark matter in the solar system. Astronomy Letters, 39(3), 141-149.
24. R Ibata,A Sollima,C Nipoti,M Bellazzini,S Chapman,E Dalessandro (2011). THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 2419: A CRUCIBLE FOR THEORIES OF GRAVITY. The Astrophysical Journal, 738(2), 186.
25. Patrick Cote,Ronald Marzke,Michael West,Dante Minniti (2000). Evidence for the Hierarchical Formation of the Galactic Spheroid. The Astrophysical Journal, 533(2), 869-883.
26. T Brown (2012). The Primeval Populations of the Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 753, 21.
27. Nobuhiro Okabe,Graham Smith,Keiichi Umetsu,Masahiro Takada,Toshifumi Futamase (2013). LoCuSS: THE MASS DENSITY PROFILE OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS AT z = 0.2 ^,. The Astrophysical Journal, 769(2), L35.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ding-Yu Chung. 2015. "The Modified Interfacial Gravity: Unifying CDM, MOG, and MOND". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 15 (GJSFR Volume 15 Issue A3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 15 Issue A3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJSFR-A Classification FOR Code: 260201

Submission ReceivedApril 18, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 15, 2015
Published May 28, 2015

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 30, 2015

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 131

Country: United States

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science

Authors: Ding-Yu Chung (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 425

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1958

Total Downloads (simulated): 113

Publish Date: 2015 05, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 59 views
Month 2: 15 views
Month 3: 54 views
Month 4: 54 views
Month 5: 45 views
Month 6: 32 views
Month 7: 53 views
Month 8: 31 views
Month 9: 22 views
Month 10: 56 views
Month 11: 27 views
Month 12: 25 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 46 views
Month 15: 23 views
Month 16: 25 views
Month 17: 21 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 29 views
Month 20: 27 views
Month 21: 44 views
Month 22: 24 views
Month 23: 35 views
Month 24: 29 views
Month 25: 21 views
Month 26: 42 views
Month 27: 39 views
Month 28: 26 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 39 views
Month 31: 41 views
Month 32: 34 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 33 views
Month 35: 21 views
Month 36: 35 views
Month 37: 43 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 19 views
Month 40: 30 views
Month 41: 23 views
Month 42: 27 views
Month 43: 28 views
Month 44: 34 views
Month 45: 37 views
Month 46: 39 views
Month 47: 38 views
Month 48: 23 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 36 views
Month 51: 16 views
Month 52: 27 views
Month 53: 46 views
Month 54: 36 views
Month 55: 49 views
Month 56: 25 views
Month 57: 21 views
Month 58: 27 views
Month 59: 43 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 22 views
Month 62: 26 views
Month 63: 23 views
Month 64: 20 views
Month 65: 34 views
Month 66: 30 views
Month 67: 30 views
Month 68: 14 views
Month 69: 41 views
Month 70: 44 views
Month 71: 27 views
Month 72: 25 views
Month 73: 46 views
Month 74: 41 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 44 views
Month 78: 32 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 36 views
Month 81: 43 views
Month 82: 24 views
Month 83: 24 views
Month 84: 46 views
Month 85: 32 views
Month 86: 31 views
Month 87: 38 views
Month 88: 23 views
Month 89: 36 views
Month 90: 31 views
Month 91: 30 views
Month 92: 35 views
Month 93: 33 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 32 views
Month 96: 24 views
Month 97: 28 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 16 views
Month 100: 14 views
Month 101: 18 views
Month 102: 29 views
Month 103: 41 views
Month 104: 40 views
Month 105: 18 views
Month 106: 29 views
Month 107: 34 views
Month 108: 34 views
Month 109: 26 views
Month 110: 20 views
Month 111: 34 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 32 views
Month 114: 20 views
Month 115: 32 views
Month 116: 37 views
Month 117: 40 views
Month 118: 43 views
Month 119: 39 views
Month 120: 40 views
Month 121: 43 views
Month 122: 33 views
Month 123: 32 views
Month 124: 25 views
Month 125: 46 views
Month 126: 40 views
Month 127: 38 views
Month 128: 34 views
Month 129: 56 views
Month 130: 39 views
Month 131: 60 views
Month 132: 62 views
Month 133: 21 views
Month 134: 59 views
Month 135: 49 views
Month 136: 49 views
Month 137: 34 views
Month 138: 53 views

Total Views: 2K

Total Downloads: 113

All Trends