
Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
SM01M
Choose where you want to hide AI Takeaway. Your site-wide choice will be remembered in this browser.
Some claimed that after Einstein, Hawking could be the great physicist. However, his only verified prediction, the nonexistence of Higgs Boson, is proven wrong. His space-time singularity theorems have been proven as due to invalid physical assumptions, the unique sign for all coupling constants. Hawking also do not understand Einstein’s unification and the existence of repulsive gravitation. Thus, the over-evaluation Hawking is due to out-dated knowledge in physics. In fact, both Hawking and Einstein had mistaken that E=mc2 were valid, and believed in Einstein’s covariance principle. In 1983, the first correction to general relativity is given by Zhou Pei-Yuan of Peking University, who points out that Einstein’s covariance principle is invalid. This is subsequently verified in 2010 by Lo with explicit examples. Moreover, Einstein’s theoretical justification for his covariance principle is found surprisingly due to his invalid applications of special relativity. Zhou suggested that a valid physical gauge would be the harmonic gauge whose linearized approximation has been subsequently proven valid by the Maxwell-Newton Approximation. Thus, Zhou could be right. However, C. N. Yang claimed that Zhou was wrong due to Yang’s misunderstanding of the gauge invariance.
C. Lo. 2019. "The Necessary Correction to General Relativity of P. Y. Zhou and The Errors of Hawking, Einstein and Yang". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 19 (GJSFR Volume 19 Issue A7).
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR
Print ISSN 0975-5896
e-ISSN 2249-4626
v1.2
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
Total Score: 145
Country: Unknown
Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research
Authors: C. Y. Lo (PhD/Dr. count: 0)
View Count (all-time): 272
Total Views (Real + Logic): 868
Total Downloads (simulated): 76
Publish Date: 2019 08, Thu
Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site performance, understand traffic, and enhance your publishing experience. Cookie Policy
Choose which optional cookies Global Journals can use. Your preference applies across this platform and can be updated any time.
These cookies are required for core website functionality and security.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.