The Paradox of the Quest for Global Peace and the Linguistic Violence of some Countriesa National Anthems: A Critical Discourse Perspective

α
Samson Olasunkanmi Oluga
Samson Olasunkanmi Oluga
σ
Teh Chee Seng
Teh Chee Seng
ρ
Gerard Sagaya Raj Rajoo
Gerard Sagaya Raj Rajoo
α Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

Send Message

To: Author

The Paradox of the Quest for Global Peace and the Linguistic Violence of some Countriesa National Anthems: A Critical Discourse Perspective

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

N65J9

The Paradox of the Quest for Global Peace and the Linguistic Violence of some Countriesa National Anthems: A Critical Discourse Perspective Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

It is axiomatic that the United Nations basically symbolizes peace and unity which member states or nations are expected to epitomize. Paradoxically, the anthems of many nations exhibit linguistic violence and rationalize or encourage using arms, shedding blood, going to war and paying supreme sacrifice. For example, we have expressions like “Hurry to arms people of Boyamo”, “To arms citizens! Form your battalions”, “War war! Soak our homeland’s flag in the wave of blood”, “Let us form cohorts, we are ready to die”, “we will drink from death and never be to our enemies like slaves”, “Our flag red with blood of victory, let us hasten to the battlefield”, “Arise Togo! Let us struggle without faltering, victory or death but dignity” and “We will be risen with weapons in our hands. Death, yes death but not shame” in the national anthems of Cuba, France, Mexico, Italy, Iraq, Vietnam, Togo and Senegal respectively. This paper identifies the linguistic violence of some countries’ national anthems, attempts a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of the various forms of linguistic violence identified and suggests a linguistic overhaul of the affected countries’ anthems. This is to discourage a situation where anthems that should be instrumental to societal tranquillity and harmony now encourage violent acts and attacks.

References

30 Cites in Article
  1. A Adetunji (2010). Locating oppressive use of language: a study of linguistic violence on nigerian women.
  2. A Al-Shawabi,N Ibrahim,N Nor (2011). Representation of Nojoud's early marriage: A CDA of online English language Yemeni newspapers.
  3. K Ayoola (2008). A critical discourse analysis of the reporting of some Niger-Delta issues in selected Nigerian newspapers.
  4. Karen Cerulo (1989). Sociopolitical Control and the Structure of National Symbols: An Empirical Analysis of National Anthems.
  5. N Fairclough (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.
  6. N Fairclough (1992). Discourse and social change.
  7. N Fairclough (1989). Language and power.
  8. Fiske-Rusciano (2009). Experiencing race, class and gender in the United States.
  9. A Fliethmann (2006). The violence of representation.
  10. W Gay (1999). Linguistic violence.
  11. B Hamid,M Yasim,K Baker,Keong,A Jalaluddin (2008). Linguistic sexism and gender role stereotyping in Malaysian English language textbooks.
  12. M Hogg,G Vaughan (2011). Social psychology.
  13. M Jorgensen,L Philips (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method.
  14. C Kellen (2003). Anthems of Australia: singing complicity.
  15. Argyris Kyridis,Anna Mavrikou,Christos Zagkos,Paraskevi Golia,Ifigenia Vamvakidou,Nikos Fotopoulos (2009). Nationalism through State-Constructed Symbols: The Case of National Anthems.
  16. Ghifary Arasta,Dito Ningtyas,Ichsan Utomo,Venessa Gogali,Widarti Widarti,Dina Andriana (2010). The Symbolic Construction of 'Anak Senja' Identity: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Popular Indie Lyrics within Spotify's Playlist Ecosystem.
  17. J Lemke (2011). Violence and language: The sign that hurts.
  18. A Luke (1997). Theory and Practice in Critical Science Discourse.
  19. L Mooney,D Knox,C Schacht (2011). Understanding social science problems.
  20. Wallis North,Weingast (2009). Violence and social order: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history.
  21. N Nur,J Aziz (2010). Discourse analysis of decision making episodes in meetings: Politeness theory and critical discourse analysis.
  22. Peter Jones (2010). Oxford University Press.
  23. P Raento,H Hamalainen,N Mikkonen (2004). Striking stories: A political geography of euro coinage.
  24. Arran Stibbe (2001). Language, Power and the Social Construction of Animals.
  25. T Sullivan (2012). Introduction to social problems.
  26. S Titscher,M Meyer,R Wodak,E Vetter (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis.
  27. D Trend (2007). The myth of media violence: A critical introduction.
  28. Teun Van Dijk (2001). Multidisciplinary Cda: A Plea for Diversity.
  29. G Webster (2006). Sports, community, nationalism and the institutional state system.
  30. J Blanquer (2005). Taking stock of leisure.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Samson Olasunkanmi Oluga. 2015. \u201cThe Paradox of the Quest for Global Peace and the Linguistic Violence of some Countriesa National Anthems: A Critical Discourse Perspective\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue G1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 200499
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 19, 2015

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4406
Total Downloads: 2204
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

It is axiomatic that the United Nations basically symbolizes peace and unity which member states or nations are expected to epitomize. Paradoxically, the anthems of many nations exhibit linguistic violence and rationalize or encourage using arms, shedding blood, going to war and paying supreme sacrifice. For example, we have expressions like “Hurry to arms people of Boyamo”, “To arms citizens! Form your battalions”, “War war! Soak our homeland’s flag in the wave of blood”, “Let us form cohorts, we are ready to die”, “we will drink from death and never be to our enemies like slaves”, “Our flag red with blood of victory, let us hasten to the battlefield”, “Arise Togo! Let us struggle without faltering, victory or death but dignity” and “We will be risen with weapons in our hands. Death, yes death but not shame” in the national anthems of Cuba, France, Mexico, Italy, Iraq, Vietnam, Togo and Senegal respectively. This paper identifies the linguistic violence of some countries’ national anthems, attempts a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of the various forms of linguistic violence identified and suggests a linguistic overhaul of the affected countries’ anthems. This is to discourage a situation where anthems that should be instrumental to societal tranquillity and harmony now encourage violent acts and attacks.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Paradox of the Quest for Global Peace and the Linguistic Violence of some Countriesa National Anthems: A Critical Discourse Perspective

Samson Olasunkanmi Oluga
Samson Olasunkanmi Oluga Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman
Teh Chee Seng
Teh Chee Seng
Gerard Sagaya Raj Rajoo
Gerard Sagaya Raj Rajoo

Research Journals