The Perceptions of Stakeholders on CSR Practices in Ghana: The Case of Consumers, Employees and Managers.

α
Isaac Tandoh
Isaac Tandoh
σ
Kwame Asare Duffour
Kwame Asare Duffour
α Xiasha University Town

Send Message

To: Author

The Perceptions of Stakeholders on CSR Practices in Ghana: The Case of Consumers, Employees and Managers.

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

X3KJ8

The Perceptions of Stakeholders on CSR Practices in Ghana: The Case of Consumers, Employees and Managers. Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The literature on the perception of stakeholders on CSR has been well documented in developed countries but less is known of it in developing countries like Ghana. Therefore, this study investigates what stakeholders of companies know about CSR practices in Ghana and how they affect their choice and delivery of products and services. Qualitative research method was used in data collection and analysis to gather rich information from customers, employees and managers of six (6) companies in Ghana. NVivo, a qualitative data analysis computer software, was used to analyze the data collected. The key findings were that, there are three categories of customers had knowledge in CSR, employees are aware of CSR and would choose organisations that are CSR-driven, managers are also aware of CSR benefits and these benefits have influence on their performance. Results also revealed that there are four (4) forms of CSR practiced most in Ghana, economic, ethical, philanthropy and environmental responsibilities respectively. The study also revealed the constraints to the performance of CSR in Ghana are financial constraints and lack of vision of management team. The study recommends that companies in Ghana increase their CSR activities to give rise to high profits and other benefits.

Generating HTML Viewer...

References

70 Cites in Article
  1. J Abor (2007). Corporate governance and financing decisions of Ghanaian listed firms.
  2. K Amponsah-Tawiah,K Dartey-Baah (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana.
  3. D Arli,H Lasmono (2010). Consumers' perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country.
  4. R Atuguba,C Dowuona Hammond (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana.
  5. Suzanne Beckmann (2007). Consumers and Corporate Social Responsibility: Matching the Unmatchable?.
  6. Rasheed Bg Khalid,Say Memon,Ooi Unknown Title.
  7. D Birch,J Moon (2004). Corporate social responsibility in Asia.
  8. P Blau (1964). Justice in Social Exchange.
  9. E Boabramah (2018). About us.
  10. H Bowen (1953). Foreword to the New Edition.
  11. A Carroll,K Shabana (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice.
  12. Archie Carroll (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance.
  13. Archie Carroll (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders.
  14. W Chapple,J Moon (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting.
  15. M Clarkson (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance.
  16. Michael Blowfield,Alan Murray (2002). Sustainable development.
  17. J Creswell (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach.
  18. Russell Cropanzano,Marie Mitchell (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review.
  19. Dartey-Baah,Amponsah-Tawiah,Agbeibor (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana's National Development.
  20. L Davis (2018). Employee Perceptions of Organizational Corporate Responsibility and Their Effect on Employee Organizational Commitment.
  21. Frank De Bakker,Peter Groenewegen,Frank Den Hond (2005). A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance.
  22. John Deckop,Carol Cirka,Lynne Andersson (2003). Doing Unto Others: The Reciprocity of Helping Behavior in Organizations.
  23. Thomas Donaldson,Lee Preston (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.
  24. P Drucker (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility.
  25. M Drumwright (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: the role of noneconomic criteria.
  26. Neeltje Du Plessis,Anské Grobler (2014). Achieving sustainability through strategically driven CSR in the South African retail sector.
  27. (2011). Developments in the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
  28. Oliver Falck,Stephan Heblich (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good.
  29. R Freeman (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.
  30. M Friedman (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
  31. J Frynas (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies.
  32. Elisabet Garriga,Domènec Melé (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory.
  33. Ghana (2015). Who We Are.
  34. G Gibbs (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing, analyzing qualitative data.
  35. Paul Godfrey,Nile Hatch (2007). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century.
  36. Michael Hopkins (2003). The Need for a Planetary Bargain.
  37. Seunghee Im,Yang Chung,Ji Yang (2016). Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit.
  38. B Israel,A Schulz,E Parker,A Becker,A Allen,J Guzman (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles.
  39. Dima Jamali (2007). The Case for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries.
  40. Thomas Jones (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined.
  41. Takis Katsoulakos,Yannis Katsoulacos (2007). Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: a stakeholder‐oriented and integrative strategic management framework.
  42. Khalid Rasheed Memon (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee engagement -A social exchange perspective.
  43. Min‐dong Lee (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead.
  44. I Maignan,O Ferrell (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework.
  45. François Maon,Adam Lindgreen,Valérie Swaen (2009). Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice.
  46. C Marshall,G (1999). Designing qualitative research.
  47. Lynette Mcdonald,Sharyn Rundle‐thiele (2008). Corporate social responsibility and bank customer satisfaction.
  48. Keith Murray,Christine Vogel (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts.
  49. N Mutch,R Aitken (2009). Being fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate reputation and CSR partnerships.
  50. Julie Nelson (2004). A Buddhist and Feminist Analysis of Ethics and Business.
  51. W Neuman,L Kreuger (2003). Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.
  52. Dan Ofori,Robert Hinson (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) perspectives of leading firms in Ghana.
  53. D Ofori,R Nyuur,M S-Darko (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Fact or fiction? A look at Ghanaian banks.
  54. D Ofori (2007). Social responsibility and ethics in Ghana: Stakeholders' expectations and challenges.
  55. S Oppong (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Ghanaian Context.
  56. M Patton (2002). Qualitative research and evaluative methods, 3rd sage publications.
  57. Dane Peterson (2004). The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment.
  58. M Porter,M Kramer (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.
  59. S Sankar,C Bhattacharya,K Daniel (2006). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment.
  60. S Sarantakos (1998). Social Research.
  61. Stephan Schmidheiny (2006). Turning Point: A View of Corporate Citizenship in Latin America.
  62. B Terre,K Durrheim,D &painter (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences.
  63. (2016). Stakeholders in corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.
  64. E Verhulst,C &boks (2014). Employee empowerment for sustainable design.
  65. W Visser (2007). The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility.
  66. Antonio Vives (2006). Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America.
  67. Sandra Waddock (2008). Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility.
  68. (2000). Licencia para innovar: Estrategias novedosas para generar impacto social.
  69. N Zulkiflli,A &amran (2006). Realizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Malaysia: A Viewfrom the Accounting Profession.
  70. S Waddock (2008). The development of corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Isaac Tandoh. 2026. \u201cThe Perceptions of Stakeholders on CSR Practices in Ghana: The Case of Consumers, Employees and Managers.\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 23 (GJMBR Volume 23 Issue A11): .

Download Citation

Perception of CSR practices in Ghana.
Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 23 Issue A11
Pg. 19- 27
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: HD28
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 12, 2024

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1043
Total Downloads: 26
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The literature on the perception of stakeholders on CSR has been well documented in developed countries but less is known of it in developing countries like Ghana. Therefore, this study investigates what stakeholders of companies know about CSR practices in Ghana and how they affect their choice and delivery of products and services. Qualitative research method was used in data collection and analysis to gather rich information from customers, employees and managers of six (6) companies in Ghana. NVivo, a qualitative data analysis computer software, was used to analyze the data collected. The key findings were that, there are three categories of customers had knowledge in CSR, employees are aware of CSR and would choose organisations that are CSR-driven, managers are also aware of CSR benefits and these benefits have influence on their performance. Results also revealed that there are four (4) forms of CSR practiced most in Ghana, economic, ethical, philanthropy and environmental responsibilities respectively. The study also revealed the constraints to the performance of CSR in Ghana are financial constraints and lack of vision of management team. The study recommends that companies in Ghana increase their CSR activities to give rise to high profits and other benefits.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Perceptions of Stakeholders on CSR Practices in Ghana: The Case of Consumers, Employees and Managers.

Isaac Tandoh
Isaac Tandoh Xiasha University Town
Kwame Asare Duffour
Kwame Asare Duffour

Research Journals