The Question of E = mc2 and Rectification of Einsteinas General Relativity

Ξ±
c._y._lo
c._y._lo
Οƒ
C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Send Message

To: Author

The Question of E = mc2 and Rectification of Einsteinas General Relativity

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFRB7B4T

The Question of E = mc2 and Rectification of Einsteinas General Relativity Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The formula E = mc 2 is a speculation that was confirmed by Nuclear fission and fusion, but is not valid for the electromagnetic energy alone because the electromagnetic energy-stress tensor is traceless. On the other hand, for the light rays satisfying E = mc 2 necessitates the existence of a photonic tensor with an anti-gravity coupling added to the Einstein equation with the source of an electromagnetic wave. This is consistent with the massive dynamic case that the Einstein equation must be rectified to the Lorentz-Levi-Einstein equation. Moreover, because the couplings in the Einstein equation must have different signs for the dynamic case that involves gravitational waves, the space-time singularity theorems of Hawking and Penrose actually are irrelevant to physics. The misinterpretation of E = mc 2 as generally valid, is responsible for overlooking the charge-mass interaction, which is crucial for the unification of gravitation and electromagnetism. General validity of E = mc 2 is also in disagreement with experiments. It is pointed out that the interpretations of E = mc^2 of both Nobel Laureates, ‘t Hooft and Wilczek, just like many others, are also incorrect.

References

55 Cites in Article
  1. C Lo (2012). The Invalid Speculation of m = E/c 2 , the Reissner-Nordstrom Metric, and Einstein's Unification.
  2. (1998). Einstein's Miraculous Year.
  3. A Einstein,H Lorentz,H Minkowski,H Weyl (1923). The Principle of Relativity.
  4. A Einstein (1954). The Meaning of Relativity.
  5. R Wald (1984). General Relativity.
  6. C Lo (2006). Completing Einstein's Proof of E = mc 2.
  7. C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
  8. C Lo (1997). Comments on Misunderstandings of Relativity and the Theoretical Interpretation of the Kreuzer Experiment.
  9. C Lo (2013). On the Question of a Dynamic Solution in General Relativity.
  10. C Lo (1995). Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation.
  11. S Editor Chandrasekhar suggests and approves the appendix therein.
  12. C Lo (1999). Compatibility with Einstein's Notion of Weak Gravity: Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Absence of Dynamic Solutions for the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  13. C Lo (2000). On Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  14. C Lo (2013). The Non-linear Einstein Equation and Conditionally Validity of its Linearization.
  15. A Gullstrand (1921). Unknown Title.
  16. C Lo (2012). Gravitation, physics, and technology.
  17. D Kramer,H Stephani,E Herlt,M Maccallum (1980). Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations.
  18. C Lo (1991). Unknown Title.
  19. A Einstein (1936). Physics and Reality.
  20. H Bondi,F Pirani,I Robinson (1959). Gravitational waves in general relativity III. Exact plane waves.
  21. H Lorentz (1916). Unknown Title.
  22. Tullio Levi-Civita (1917). Einsteinian Gravitation.
  23. A Einstein (1916). Unknown Title.
  24. C Lo (2003). The bending of light ray and unphysical solutions in general relativity.
  25. L Herrera,N Santos,J Skea (2003). Letter: Active Gravitational Mass and the Invariant Characterization of Reissner–NordstrΓΆm Spacetime.
  26. E Whittaker (1935). Unknown Title.
  27. Richard Tolman (1930). On the Use of the Energy-Momentum Principle in General Relativity.
  28. C Lo,C Wong (2006). Unknown Title.
  29. D Yu,V Tsipenyuk,Andreev (2005). Physical Interpretations of the Theory of Relativity Conference.
  30. G Hooft (1999). A CONFONTATION WITH INFINITY.
  31. C Lo (2008). Unknown Title.
  32. C Lo (2011). On Physical Invalidity of the 'Cylindrical Symmetric Waves' of 't Hooft.
  33. J Jackson (1962). Classical Electrodynamics.
  34. Frank Wilczek (2004). Nobel Lecture: Asymptotic freedom: From paradox to paradigm.
  35. C Pekeris (1982). Gravitational field of a charged mass point.
  36. S Weinberg (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology.
  37. C Lo,G Goldstein,A Napier (1989). Electromagnetic Radiation Reaction Force and Radiation Potential in General Five-Dimensional Relativity.
  38. T Musha,T Kanamoto (1994). Proc. of the 38th Space Science and Technology Conference.
  39. T Musha (1997). Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Aerospace Propulsion.
  40. D Buehler (2004). Alija Izetbegović’s temperancetemperance movementmining areasMethodismEducation Act 1870drinking. See also beer houses; public housescultural role ofcultural role, of drinkingLiverpoolrace meetingshorse-racing. See also race meetingscruelty to animalsHolman, Georgeanimal cruelty, and horse racingNational Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animalsβ€˜Hotspur’social significance, of gamblinggambling. See also betting; gamingsocial/cultural significance ofcultural significance, of gamblingTelegraph, TheNational Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animalsmiddle classesand horse-racinghorse-racing. See also race meetingsand middle classeshorse-racing. See also race meetingsbetting onFeist, Henrybookmakersbetting. See also gambling; gamingon horse-racingworking classes. See also poor peoplegambling ofupper classes. See also elitesgambling ofsocial cost, of gamblinglegislation. See also law(s)against gamblinggambling. See also betting; gamingof working classesgambling. See also betting; gamingof upper classesgambling. See also betting; gaminglegislationgambling. See also betting; gamingdebtsgambling. See also betting; gamingand classdebts, gamblingclass. See also middle classes; upper classes; working classesand gamblingoppositionto gaming/bettinggaming. See also betting; gamblingopposition tobetting. See also gambling; gamingopposition toStarkie, ThomasSelect Committee on Statutes Against Gaming 1844middle classesgambling ofgambling. See also betting; gamingvisibility ofgambling. See also betting; gamingof middle classesgambling. See also betting; gamingand classgambling. See also betting; gaminganti-gambling campaignclass. See also middle classes; upper classes; working classesand gamblingbetting. See also gambling; gamingvice ofbetting. See also gambling; gamingas a moral sinBaxter, Robertanti-gambling campaignIslamic Declaration and Populism in Bosnia.
  41. W Liu (2007). Unknown Title.
  42. A Einstein,W Pauli (1943). Unknown Title.
  43. Demetrios Christodoulou,Sergiu Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space (PMS-41).
  44. C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the β€œDynamic Solutions” Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
  45. T Damour,J Taylor (1992). Strong-field tests of relativistic gravity and binary pulsars.
  46. C Lo (2013). On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies and Influences.
  47. R Schoen,S.-T Yau (1981). Proof of the Positive Mass Theorem. II.
  48. Edward Witten (1981). A new proof of the positive energy theorem.
  49. Walter Isaacson (2008). Einstein -His Life and Universe.
  50. C Lo (2007). The Necessity of Unifying Gravitation and Electromagnetism, Mass-Charge Repulsive Effects, and the Five Dimensional Theory.
  51. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  52. C Lo (2012). On the Weight Reduction of Metals due to Temperature Increments.
  53. N Hu,D.-H Zhang,& H.-G Ding (1981). Unknown Title.
  54. C Lo,S Yau (1982). The Errors in the Fields Medals.
  55. (2025). General relativity, dynamics: curvature, the Einstein–Hilbert action, and the Einstein equation.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

c._y._lo. 2014. \u201cThe Question of E = mc2 and Rectification of Einsteinas General Relativity\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue A2): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 6, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4462
Total Downloads: 2180
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The formula E = mc 2 is a speculation that was confirmed by Nuclear fission and fusion, but is not valid for the electromagnetic energy alone because the electromagnetic energy-stress tensor is traceless. On the other hand, for the light rays satisfying E = mc 2 necessitates the existence of a photonic tensor with an anti-gravity coupling added to the Einstein equation with the source of an electromagnetic wave. This is consistent with the massive dynamic case that the Einstein equation must be rectified to the Lorentz-Levi-Einstein equation. Moreover, because the couplings in the Einstein equation must have different signs for the dynamic case that involves gravitational waves, the space-time singularity theorems of Hawking and Penrose actually are irrelevant to physics. The misinterpretation of E = mc 2 as generally valid, is responsible for overlooking the charge-mass interaction, which is crucial for the unification of gravitation and electromagnetism. General validity of E = mc 2 is also in disagreement with experiments. It is pointed out that the interpretations of E = mc^2 of both Nobel Laureates, ‘t Hooft and Wilczek, just like many others, are also incorrect.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Question of E = mc2 and Rectification of Einsteinas General Relativity

C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo

Research Journals