The Questionnaire: Tools for Measuring and Evaluating Inpatient Satisfaction

α
Moukhafi Sahar
Moukhafi Sahar

Send Message

To: Author

The Questionnaire: Tools for Measuring and Evaluating Inpatient Satisfaction

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

DMRP5

The Questionnaire: Tools for Measuring and Evaluating Inpatient Satisfaction Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

References

33 Cites in Article
  1. D Asch (1996). Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias.
  2. David Asch,M Jedrziewski,Nicholas Christakis (1997). Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
  3. David Asch (1996). Use of a Coded Postcard to Maintain Anonymity in a Highly Sensitive Mail Survey: Cost, Response Rates, and Bias.
  4. David Asch,M Jedrziewski,Nicholas Christakis (1997). Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
  5. S Briancon,F Girard,F Empereur,F Guillemin (2000). Posters - Evaluation des pratiques professionnelles en medecine du travail.
  6. Raymond Carey,Jerry Seibert (1993). A Patient Survey System to Measure Quality Improvement.
  7. Raymond Carey,Jerry Seibert (1993). A Patient Survey System to Measure Quality Improvement.
  8. Paul Cleary,Susan Edgman-Levitan,Marc Roberts,Thomas Moloney,William Mcmullen,Janice Walker,Thomas Delbanco (1991). Patients Evaluate Their Hospital Care: A National Survey.
  9. Geoff Cohen,John Forbes,Michael Garraway (1996). Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys: Table 1.
  10. P Czernichow,J Chaperon,Le Contour,X (2001). Épidémiologie -Connaissances et Pratiques.
  11. P Czernichow (2001). Épidémiologie-Connaissances et Pratiques.
  12. E Masson Doering (1983). Factors influencing inpatient satisfaction with care.
  13. (1988). Unknown Title.
  14. R Fitzpatrick (1991). Surveys of patient satisfaction: II--Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey..
  15. I Gasquet (1999). Satisfaction des patients et performance hospitalière.
  16. J Hall (1988). Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels.
  17. Judith Hall,Michael Dornan (1988). Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels.
  18. R Izane,M Maciejewski,M Finch (1997). The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes.
  19. Richard Kravitz (1996). Patients' Expectations for Medical Care: An Expanded Formulation Based on Review of the Literature.
  20. R Kravitz (1996). Patients' Expectations for Medical Care: An Expanded Formulation Based on Review of the Literature.
  21. E Nelson (1989). The patient judgement system: Reliability and validity.
  22. Phi Nguyen Thi,S Briançon,F Empereur,F Guillemin (2002). Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care.
  23. Nunally Je (1978). Psychometrie Theory.
  24. Pourin E (1999). La mesure de la satisfaction des patients hospitalisés. 1" partie : Aspects conceptuels et revue de travaux.
  25. E Roumeau-Rouquette,B Blondel,M Kaminski,G Breárt (1993). Épidémiologie -Méthodes et pratiques.
  26. H Rubin (1990). Can patients evaluate the quality of care?.
  27. (null). Sivrihissar (in vico). Op. cit. Op. cit. 334, n. 19..
  28. (1996). La Satisfaction des Patients. Lors de Leur Prise en Charge dans les Établissements de Santé.
  29. J Sitzia (1999). How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.
  30. J Sitzia (1999). How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.
  31. Cretien Van Campen,Herman Sixma,Roland Friele,Jan Kerssens,Loe Peters (1995). Quality of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Review of Measuring Instruments.
  32. John Ware,Ron Hays (1988). Methods For Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Specific Medical Encounters.
  33. B Williams (1994). Patient satisfaction: A valid concept.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Moukhafi Sahar. 2026. \u201cThe Questionnaire: Tools for Measuring and Evaluating Inpatient Satisfaction\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 22 (GJMR Volume 22 Issue K6): .

Download Citation

Patient satisfaction questionnaire tools for evaluating inpatient satisfaction in medical research journals. Focuses on healthcare quality.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-K Classification: DDC Code: 302.072 LCC Code: H62
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 19, 2022

Language
fr
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1538
Total Downloads: 60
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Questionnaire: Tools for Measuring and Evaluating Inpatient Satisfaction

Moukhafi Sahar
Moukhafi Sahar

Research Journals