The Review of using Unified BPM Cycle for Public Credit Recovery Activites

α
Nipuni Sashanka Perera
Nipuni Sashanka Perera

Send Message

To: Author

The Review of using Unified BPM Cycle for Public Credit Recovery Activites

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

10J5P

The Review of using Unified BPM Cycle for Public Credit Recovery Activites Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) is a combination of Information Technology and management science, which applies to improve business process in order to improve operational excellence and business performances [1] leading to process automation. This review article based is on a case study in application of business governance in public sector organization, which was conducted by Abimael R. Do Nascimento, Roquemar de Lima Baldam, Lourenço Costa and Thalmo de Paiva Coelho Junior in 2018. The article analyzes the implementation of unified BPM in operational activities in a federal public advocacy body with evaluating corporate governance practices of the process. The study used mix method approach to gather data and to analyze them. Findings revealed the requirement of corporate governance practices, prioritizing BMP and auditing process.

References

15 Cites in Article
  1. Wil Van Der Aalst (2013). Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey.
  2. R Abimael,Roquemar Nascimento,Lourenço De Lima Baldam,Thalmo Costa,Paiva De,Junior Coelho (2020). Applications of business governanve and the unified BPM cycle in public credit recovery service.
  3. Thomas Gulledge,Rainer Sommer (2002). Business process management: public sector implications.
  4. G Papadopoulos,E Kechagias,P Legga,I Tatsiopoulos (2018). Integrating Business Process Management with Public Sector.
  5. J Becker,L Algermissen,B Niehaves (2006). A procedure model for process oriented: E-Government projects.
  6. Bjoern Niehaves,Ralf Plattfaut,Joerg Becker (2013). Business process management capabilities in local governments: A multi-method study.
  7. R Gabryelczyk,A Jurczuk (2016). Business process management in the public sector: explored and future research fields.
  8. Michael Rohloff (2010). Advances in business process management implementation based on a maturity assessment and best practice exchange.
  9. John Jeston,J Nelis (2006). Business Process Management.
  10. M Markus,Dax Jacobson (2010). Business Process Governance.
  11. M Das (1210). Enterprise System Journal.
  12. Marek Szelągowski (2018). Evolution of the BPM Lifecycle.
  13. J Byrne (2007). Ethical Issues in Social Work Research.
  14. Jens Ohlsson,Shengnan Han,Paul Johannesson,Fredrik Carpenhall,Lazar Rusu (2014). Prioritizing Business Processes Improvement Initiatives: The Seco Tools Case.
  15. Jens Ohlsson,Shengnan Han,Harry Bouwman (2017). The prioritization and categorization method (PCM) process evaluation at Ericsson: a case study.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Nipuni Sashanka Perera. 2020. \u201cThe Review of using Unified BPM Cycle for Public Credit Recovery Activites\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - G: Interdisciplinary GJCST-G Volume 20 (GJCST Volume 20 Issue G4): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJCST Volume 20 Issue G4
Pg. 13- 20
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-G Classification: J.1
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 20, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4397
Total Downloads: 1079
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Business Process Management (BPM) is a combination of Information Technology and management science, which applies to improve business process in order to improve operational excellence and business performances [1] leading to process automation. This review article based is on a case study in application of business governance in public sector organization, which was conducted by Abimael R. Do Nascimento, Roquemar de Lima Baldam, Lourenço Costa and Thalmo de Paiva Coelho Junior in 2018. The article analyzes the implementation of unified BPM in operational activities in a federal public advocacy body with evaluating corporate governance practices of the process. The study used mix method approach to gather data and to analyze them. Findings revealed the requirement of corporate governance practices, prioritizing BMP and auditing process.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Review of using Unified BPM Cycle for Public Credit Recovery Activites

Nipuni Sashanka Perera
Nipuni Sashanka Perera

Research Journals