The Risk Level of Viet Nam Construction Industry under the Impacts of a Two Factors Model During and after the Global Crisis 2007-2011

Dinh Huy

The Risk Level of Viet Nam Construction Industry under the Impacts of a Two Factors Model During and after the Global Crisis 2007-2011

Dr. Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy § MBA degree

Contact

§ University of Japan

The Risk Level of Viet Nam Construction Industry under the Impacts of a Two Factors Model During and after the Global Crisis 2007-2011

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCEK71NV

The Risk Level of Viet Nam Construction Industry under the Impacts of a Two Factors Model During and after the Global Crisis 2007-2011 Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Using a two (2) factors model, this research paper analyzes the impacts of both financial leverage and the size of firms’ competitors in the construction industry on the market risk level of 104 listed companies in this category. This paper founds out that the risk dispersion level in this sample study could be minimized in case financial leverage decreases down to 20% and the competitor size doubles (measured by equity beta var of 0,253). Beside, the empirical research findings show us that the risk level could be reduced when financial leverage increases up to 30% and the size of competitor doubles (measured by equity beta value of 0,934). Last but not least, this paper illustrates calculated results that might give proper recommendations to relevant governments and institutions in reevaluating their policies during and after the financial crisis 2007-2011.

References

13 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. John Dexheimer,Carla Haugen (2003). Sarbanes-Oxley: Its Impact on the Venture Capital Community. Minnesota Journal of Business Law and Entrepreneurship, 2(1)
2. Fama Eugene,Kenneth French (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives
3. Kaouther Flifel (2012). Financial Markets between Efficiency and Persistence: Empirical Evidence on Daily Data. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2)
4. Huasheng Gao,Jarrad Harford,Kai Li (2013). Determinants of corporate cash policy: Insights from private firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 623-639.
CrossRef DOI
5. Dinh Huy (2012). Estimating Beta of Viet Nam listed construction companies groups during the crisis. Journal of Integration and Development
6. Jayant Kale,Costanza Meneghetti,Husayn Sharur (2013). Contracting with Nonfinancial Stakeholders and Corporate Capital Structure: The Case of Product Warranties. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(3), 699-727.
CrossRef DOI
7. Kate Litvak (2008). Defensive Management: Does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Discourage Corporate Risk- Taking?, Law and Economics Research Paper, No. Law and Economics Research Paper, 108.
CrossRef DOI
8. A. Ling (2013). Tax Issues Relating to Intangibles, Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 19(2)
CrossRef DOI
9. Wenling Lu,David Whidbee (2013). Bank Structure and Failure. Journal of Financial Econoic Policy
10. Xiying Zhang,Ivy (2007). Economic consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 74-115.
CrossRef DOI
11. A. Ang,J. Chen (2007). CAPM over the long run. Journal of Empirical Finance
12. H. Baker,J. Singleton,E. Veit (2011). Survey Research in Corporate Finance: Bridging The Gap Between Theory and Practice. Survey Research in Corporate Finance
13.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy. 2026. "The Risk Level of Viet Nam Construction Industry under the Impacts of a Two Factors Model During and after the Global Crisis 2007-2011". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue 29 (C10)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 13 Issue 29 (C10)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

asset and equity beta competitive firm size Construction industry market risk risk management

Classification

GJMBR-C Classification JEL Code: G00

G30

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2013
Published August 26, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 26, 2013

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Viet Nam

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance

Authors: Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 362

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5357

Total Downloads (simulated): 357

Publish Date: 2013 08, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 34 views
Month 2: 35 views
Month 3: 47 views
Month 4: 47 views
Month 5: 50 views
Month 6: 37 views
Month 7: 46 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 41 views
Month 10: 45 views
Month 11: 35 views
Month 12: 34 views
Month 13: 31 views
Month 14: 36 views
Month 15: 16 views
Month 16: 36 views
Month 17: 46 views
Month 18: 44 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 21 views
Month 21: 14 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 17 views
Month 24: 26 views
Month 25: 32 views
Month 26: 46 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 44 views
Month 29: 24 views
Month 30: 44 views
Month 31: 14 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 29 views
Month 34: 32 views
Month 35: 31 views
Month 36: 37 views
Month 37: 27 views
Month 38: 20 views
Month 39: 26 views
Month 40: 27 views
Month 41: 21 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 35 views
Month 44: 26 views
Month 45: 13 views
Month 46: 21 views
Month 47: 17 views
Month 48: 44 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 46 views
Month 52: 22 views
Month 53: 28 views
Month 54: 28 views
Month 55: 31 views
Month 56: 28 views
Month 57: 28 views
Month 58: 30 views
Month 59: 24 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 35 views
Month 62: 31 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 23 views
Month 65: 35 views
Month 66: 37 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 19 views
Month 69: 18 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 44 views
Month 72: 31 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 47 views
Month 75: 41 views
Month 76: 43 views
Month 77: 32 views
Month 78: 16 views
Month 79: 31 views
Month 80: 41 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 26 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 32 views
Month 85: 41 views
Month 86: 27 views
Month 87: 35 views
Month 88: 22 views
Month 89: 38 views
Month 90: 21 views
Month 91: 16 views
Month 92: 23 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 23 views
Month 95: 32 views
Month 96: 38 views
Month 97: 22 views
Month 98: 37 views
Month 99: 46 views
Month 100: 42 views
Month 101: 20 views
Month 102: 15 views
Month 103: 28 views
Month 104: 40 views
Month 105: 27 views
Month 106: 23 views
Month 107: 44 views
Month 108: 42 views
Month 109: 25 views
Month 110: 12 views
Month 111: 28 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 31 views
Month 114: 22 views
Month 115: 12 views
Month 116: 39 views
Month 117: 36 views
Month 118: 42 views
Month 119: 26 views
Month 120: 35 views
Month 121: 41 views
Month 122: 21 views
Month 123: 32 views
Month 124: 21 views
Month 125: 23 views
Month 126: 25 views
Month 127: 44 views
Month 128: 20 views
Month 129: 25 views
Month 130: 19 views
Month 131: 39 views
Month 132: 34 views
Month 133: 29 views
Month 134: 24 views
Month 135: 13 views
Month 136: 28 views
Month 137: 41 views
Month 138: 26 views
Month 139: 22 views
Month 140: 29 views
Month 141: 15 views
Month 142: 36 views
Month 143: 43 views
Month 144: 22 views
Month 145: 48 views
Month 146: 28 views
Month 147: 26 views
Month 148: 17 views
Month 149: 36 views
Month 150: 17 views
Month 151: 24 views
Month 152: 23 views
Month 153: 25 views
Month 154: 23 views
Month 155: 36 views
Month 156: 25 views
Month 157: 37 views
Month 158: 35 views
Month 159: 60 views

Total Views: 5.4K

Total Downloads: 357

All Trends